 | reply to othehorror
Re: Slower than 90% of the US. Woo! Paying for 5/1.
|
|
 | Hi,
If you email me your account & contact numbers I will have one of our DSL specialist check your line and call to help you.
Thanks,
Corey Tidwell talktous@centurylink.com |
|
|
|
 Reviews:
·Embarq Now Centu..
| reply to Eastern NC
Re: Slower than 90% of the US. Woo! said by Eastern NC :Paying for 5/1.
 Seems pretty typical.
I'm paying for 1.5:
 |
|
 D Smoke join:2002-06-14 Minneapolis, MN 1 edit | Guess I'm lucky  40/5 Haven't really had any problems surprisingly with CL. This is our work connection, use to have Comcast business class at our old shop and use to pull 70+ down there. I begged comcast to run lines to our new shop but they said they wouldn't when we moved in. To be honest our CL connection has been more reliable than our Comcast business class connection was. Only been using it since last October so time will tell but they have exceeded my expectations thus far. We even use multiple VOIP lines & a Sprint cell phone repeater without to many issues. Using it day to day tasks I don't notice any difference is speed for browsing vs our comcast connection. Don't really do that much downloading not to mention most things don't download at full speed anyway and when they do 37 down is plenty fast. |
|
 | Congratulations, looks like you're in one of the 2 or 3 markets where they actually purchase enough bandwidth to provide customers with the service they're paying for in. |
|
 tobyTroy Mcclure join:2001-11-13 Seattle, WA | reply to othehorror I have found Comcast's speedtest site to be the best one, as it runs longer, not just a burst.
»speedtest.comcast.net/ |
|
 | Centurylink DSl is getting way too expensive, $55 for a 1.5 meg connection isn't the greatest. About ready to switch. A 10 meg service is available at $45 a month |
|
 Reviews:
·CenturyLink
| reply to othehorror My connection is doing a fantastic imitation of ISDN this afternoon:
Reply from 65.164.192.1: bytes=32 time=151ms TTL=253 Reply from 65.164.192.1: bytes=32 time=147ms TTL=253 Reply from 65.164.192.1: bytes=32 time=148ms TTL=253 Reply from 65.164.192.1: bytes=32 time=150ms TTL=253 Reply from 65.164.192.1: bytes=32 time=153ms TTL=253 Reply from 65.164.192.1: bytes=32 time=129ms TTL=253 Reply from 65.164.192.1: bytes=32 time=135ms TTL=253 Reply from 65.164.192.1: bytes=32 time=138ms TTL=253 Reply from 65.164.192.1: bytes=32 time=148ms TTL=253 Reply from 65.164.192.1: bytes=32 time=156ms TTL=253 Reply from 65.164.192.1: bytes=32 time=144ms TTL=253 Reply from 65.164.192.1: bytes=32 time=146ms TTL=253 Reply from 65.164.192.1: bytes=32 time=148ms TTL=253 Reply from 65.164.192.1: bytes=32 time=146ms TTL=253 Reply from 65.164.192.1: bytes=32 time=141ms TTL=253 Reply from 65.164.192.1: bytes=32 time=169ms TTL=253 Reply from 65.164.192.1: bytes=32 time=145ms TTL=253 Reply from 65.164.192.1: bytes=32 time=176ms TTL=253 Reply from 65.164.192.1: bytes=32 time=156ms TTL=253 Reply from 65.164.192.1: bytes=32 time=144ms TTL=253 Reply from 65.164.192.1: bytes=32 time=145ms TTL=253 Reply from 65.164.192.1: bytes=32 time=143ms TTL=253 Reply from 65.164.192.1: bytes=32 time=154ms TTL=253
That's the gateway. Should be 24-26ms.
Today marks a week straight of this, only today is the worst it has been. Sent an email to CTL Thursday and never heard back from them. |
|
 Reviews:
·CenturyLink
| 
Isn't this pretty? |
|