 | Compressed HTML page, "submit"ted: Is upload compresse I'm wondering, if one implements www page compression on an IIS 7 server (the pages front-end a database, actually), and a user makes changes to the page and re-submits it (via Form.submit), is that uploaded page compressed (since the original page was), or is it sent plaintext?
(By default for a modern IE browser.)
Thanks for any info! |
|
 | Re: Compressed HTML page, "submit"ted: Is upload compr How a page is received from a server does not affect how the form is sent back.
IE is not a modern browser. |
|
|
|
 cdruGo ColtsPremium,MVM join:2003-05-14 Fort Wayne, IN kudos:5 Reviews:
·Frontier FiOS
| reply to PrivacyAlert said by PrivacyAlert :and a user makes changes to the page and re-submits it (via Form.submit), is that uploaded page compressed (since the original page was), or is it sent plaintext? The page is never sent back. The form fields may be transmitted back but usually is only a small fraction of what the total page was. Compression would be almost negligible in many cases and I don't believe browsers support compression POST requests like they would do with responses. You could possibly write your own compression and decompression if you were handling both sides of the conversation (e.g. a client/server custom application), but if you are writing a generic web application that uses a browser, then don't worry about it. |
|
 cdruGo ColtsPremium,MVM join:2003-05-14 Fort Wayne, IN kudos:5 Reviews:
·Frontier FiOS
| reply to howardfine In related news, Steve Jobs thought Microsoft Windows was an inferior product. News at 11. He's the HTML evangelist for Firefox. His job is to put down IE and talk up how Firefox is superior.
mod·ern /ˈmädərn/ Adjective: Of or relating to the present or recent times as opposed to the remote past.
Note that no where in that definition does supporting the latest standard imply modernness. IE9, being the currently maintained release, by definition is a modern browser. |
|
 Reviews:
·AT&T Southwest
·Charter
1 edit | said by cdru:In related news, Steve Jobs thought Microsoft Windows was an inferior product. It is but that's off-topic. quote: He's the HTML evangelist for Firefox. His job is to put down IE and talk up how Firefox is superior.
1) Um. I use Chrome 2) IE is inferior. Known, provable, verifiable. Every web developer knows that. quote: mod·ern /ˈmädərn/ Adjective: Of or relating to the present or recent times as opposed to the remote past.
Note that no where in that definition does supporting the latest standard imply modernness. IE9, being the currently maintained release, by definition is a modern browser.
Yep. That's what he meant I guess. You win. Feel proud of yourself now? |
|
 cdruGo ColtsPremium,MVM join:2003-05-14 Fort Wayne, IN kudos:5 Reviews:
·Frontier FiOS
| said by howardfine:1) Um. I use Chrome 2) IE is inferior. Known, provable, verifiable. Every web developer knows that. 1. Never said you didn't, nor implied it. I was only commenting on the webpage you linked to. 2. No arguments. But inferior or superior doesn't have any relationship to modernness. HTTP compression has been around forever and has been supported by any browser for a very long time.
Yep. That's what he meant I guess. You win. Feel proud of yourself now? Yup. Or at least better then I would had I pointed out deficiencies of a browser in a response to a question that had nothing really to do with the modernness of a browser. |
|
 | I get it now. I thought you were referring to me, not Paul. I apologize for the backlash. However, despite Paul being a FF evangelist, his points are all true and correct. |
|