site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

wiid

join:2008-02-17
Outland

reply to actualsize

Re: why does anyone want broadband from a satellite provider

I assume there are better solutions than DirecTV. Even cell phone internet would likely have less latency.

fish1000

join:2011-12-14
Mcalester, OK

Many who cannot get DSL often cannot get cell phone coverage either. I do not know why, but small town cell tower footprints are not very big, even when they are 3G. Satellite or dial up is the only choice.


chgo_man99

join:2010-01-01
Schaumburg, IL

EDGE and evdo tend to have larger coverage than 3g umts overall. Even 200-300kps on edge is better than dial-up.



joako
Premium
join:2000-09-07
/dev/null
kudos:5
Reviews:
·Comcast

reply to wiid

said by wiid:

I assume there are better solutions than DirecTV. Even cell phone internet would likely have less latency.

These same places that can't get DSL or cable internet are the same places that T-Mobile and Sprint (except for maybe Nextel... is that still around?) have no coverage. There are entire counties here in Florida where there is no T-Mobile coverage and AT&T is EDGE-only. I used to carry a Sprint PCS and a Nextel phone for that reason.
--
PRescott7-2097

Saturday, 25-May 06:16:14 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 13.5 years online © 1999-2013 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics