Information copied from the DSL Connection page:

Uptime: 0 days, 6:05:15
Modulation: G.992.3 Annex A
Bandwidth (Up/Down) [kbps/kbps]: 797 / 6.015
Data Transferred (Sent/Received) [KB/KB]: 0,00 / 0,00
Output Power (Up/Down) [dBm]: 12,0 / 10,0
Line Attenuation (Up/Down) [dB]: 5,5 / 10,0
SN Margin (Up/Down) [dB]: 11,5 / 29,5
Vendor ID (Local/Remote): TMMB / BDCM
Loss of Framing (Local/Remote): 0 / 0
Loss of Signal (Local/Remote): 2 / 0
Loss of Power (Local/Remote): 0 / 0
Loss of Link (Remote): 0
Error Seconds (Local/Remote): 2 / 0
FEC Errors (Up/Down): 0 / 0
CRC Errors (Up/Down): 0 / 0
HEC Errors (Up/Down): 0 / 0

Edit: Thought I'd throw in the DMT screenshot too, for comparison.

actions · 2012-Feb-9 3:03 pm ·

JenSuisUn
Premium Member
join:2006-02-23
Chatham, ON

JenSuisUn

Premium Member

2012-Feb-9 3:23 pm

Line Status: In Service UpTime:
Line Profile Name: al1_d6016-384_u800-256
Last State Change: 02/09 08:55:04
DLM State: DISABLED Equipment Type: 7330_REM
Operational Status Speed (Kbs) Relative Capacity Occupation (%) Noise Margin (0..31 dB) Signal Power (0..20 dBm) Attenuation (0..60 dB) Block count
UpStream
797.0 81.0 11.2 12.1 5.3 3054927869.0
DownStream
6015.0 48.0 29.1 10.0 10.0 596695630.0

actions · 2012-Feb-9 3:23 pm ·

sgfan
join:2008-04-11
Gloucester, ON

sgfan

Member

2012-Feb-9 3:35 pm

I don't know what the al1 profile means but I can assume it means fast path? So, then it's probably a glitch with the remote reporting the wrong setting to the modem then, as HiVolt mentioned earlier.

actions · 2012-Feb-9 3:35 pm ·

HiVolt
Premium Member
join:2000-12-28
Toronto, ON

HiVolt

Premium Member

2012-Feb-10 1:57 pm

said by sgfan:

Actually, I assumed you were on IKNS remote, but you are on broadcom, which has no upstream snr or interleave bug as far as I know.

actions · 2012-Feb-10 1:57 pm ·

HiVolt

HiVolt

Premium Member

2012-Feb-10 1:59 pm

Martin, do you know why he syncs at 6015/797? Is this specific to thus type remote maybe? Profile clearly shows 6016/800 as you pasted it.

actions · 2012-Feb-10 1:59 pm ·

HiVolt

HiVolt

Premium Member

2012-Feb-10 4:04 pm

Actually, I just noticed, he's on the newer VDSL2 Alcatel remote...

"Equipment Type: 7330_REM"

And the profile is ADSL2, not ADSL1, and not ADSL2+. Perhaps some limitation with these remotes not supporting legacy ADSL1, and Bell is setting ADSL2 profiles?

actions · 2012-Feb-10 4:04 pm ·

kovy7
join:2009-03-26

kovy7

Member

2012-Feb-10 6:18 pm

said by HiVolt:

Nah, I believe it's a simple configuration thing on the slam.

actions · 2012-Feb-10 6:18 pm ·

sgfan
join:2008-04-11
Gloucester, ON

sgfan to HiVolt

Member

2012-Feb-10 11:15 pm

to HiVolt

Checking my earlier DMT screenshots, when I was on the earlier 5mbit profile, I still had the weird 797k upstream. Profile was also ADSL 2. It's a profile Bell chose when they put the connection on a remote. One of the TSI reps on the direct forum said that this was normal.

actions · 2012-Feb-10 11:15 pm ·

kovy7
join:2009-03-26

kovy7

Member

2012-Feb-11 1:58 am

said by sgfan:

Bell doesn't chose much... it's a config on the SLAM. Pretty sure if you had a ADSL modem only, it would say ADSL... it's like backward compatible.

actions · 2012-Feb-11 1:58 am ·

Forums → O Canada! → Canadian → TekSavvy	« Vancouver Cable - Becoming quite slow @ peak hours • [DSL] Sending email through iCloud »
This is a sub-selection from [DSL] Official 5Megs to 6Megs upgrade thread.