Talk > Pub Games > [game] Dethy 3

reply to Kristopher

Re: [game] Dethy 3

reply to Kristopher
Scenario: Arch is guilty

(FAKE) Archivis: Guilty on Adalicia
(Insane/Naive) Adalicia: Innocent on Archivis
(Insane/Paranoid) Kristopher: Guilty on Adalicia
(Sane/Naive) Krisnatharok: Innocent on Brom
(Insane/Paranoid) Brom: Guilty on Krisnatharok

There is no such scenario in which you can cleanly assign a role to each player. Therefore, I am technically legit. One of three players have to be insane and if I am mafia, then all three players cannot have good results in order for this to be true. You can assign Paranoid/Naive roles to them, but that leaves one of them to be insane, which is not possible.
---------
Scenario: Adalicia is guilty

(Sane/Paranoid) Archivis: Guilty on Adalicia
(FAKE) Adalicia: Innocent on Archivis
(Sane/Paranoid) Kristopher: Guilty on Adalicia
(Sane/Naive) Krisnatharok: Innocent on Brom
(Insane/Paranoid) Brom: Guilty on Krisnatharok

The above scenario is plausible. You can reduce Archivis/Kristopher to Sane/Paranoid, covering both of those roles. You can give Brom Insane and Krisnatharok Naive.
---------
Scenario: Kristopher is guilty

(Insane/Paranoid) Archivis: Guilty on Adalicia
(Sane/Naive) Adalicia: Innocent on Archivis
(FAKE) Kristopher: Guilty on Adalicia
(Sane/Naive) Krisnatharok: Innocent on Brom
(Insane/Paranoid) Brom: Guilty on Krisnatharok

No results against Kristopher means this scenario is likely, due to lack of info. Two guilties and two innocents are par when you don't investigate mafia.
----------
Scenario: Krisnatharok is guilty

(Insane/Paranoid) Archivis: Guilty on Adalicia
(Sane/Naive) Adalicia: Innocent on Archivis
(Insane/Paranoid) Kristopher: Guilty on Adalicia
(FAKE) Krisnatharok: Innocent on Brom
(Sane/Paranoid) Brom: Guilty on Krisnatharok

Above scenario is possible. Brom is Sane, Adalicia is Naive, Kristopher/Archivis are Insane/Paranoid.
-----------
Scenario: Brom is guilty

(Insane/Paranoid) Archivis: Guilty on Adalicia
(Sane/Naive) Adalicia: Innocent on Archivis
(Insane/Paranoid) Kristopher: Guilty on Adalicia
(Insane/Naive) Krisnatharok: Innocent on Brom
(FAKE) Brom: Guilty on Krisnatharok

Above scenario is possible. Archivis/Kristopher cover Insane/Paranoid. Adalicia is Sane. Krisnatharok is naive.
-----------

Therefore, only I am cleared. Everyone else is still suspect.
--
A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to take everything you have. -MLK

vote night

Gonna be a busy day, not sure how much time I'll have to be lazy...

reply to Archivis

reply to Archivis
That made my head hurt. I blame it on just waking up.

vote: Night

reply to ekster
This is a logic-based game. Even though logic cleared only me and it looks "suspect" to clear only myself, it cannot be disputed. Feel free to try though. I went through and objectively looked through everyone.

The results cannot hold up if I am mafia. There is no way to safely put everyone into a role in which that scenario holds true.

There is a scenario possible for everyone else. That is fine and normal for Day 1, so nobody needs to get all FUD'y defensive.
--
A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to take everything you have. -MLK

Vote: Night

reply to ekster
And night it is

Cops, send me your investigations, docs, send me your protections,
townies, do nothing.

I kid about the docs and townies, by the way, before anyone's head explodes.

Arch is dead. He was a bum.

IT IS DAY

Guilty on Brom.

We'll get nothing on Arch being dead, so it'll be interesting to see who investigated him.
--
Play DSLr Mafia: »Pub Games

I got an innocent on Kristopher.

Innocent on KrisN

I'm going to assume that makes me Naive I guess? Or possibly Sane?

2 innocents. Naive or Sane.

Wait, Naive, Sane, or Insane. I'll have more once we get KrisN's result.
--
Play DSLr Mafia: »Pub Games

How can Ada be insane and have two Innocent's? Wouldn't that mean there would be two mafia?

reply to ekster
I got a guilty on Adalicia. That means either he or Brom is mafia, depending on whether I am sane/insane.

I think you're lying. Ada has to be naive now.

reply to Krisnatharok
It's between KrisN and myself I think. Arch and KrisT are Insane/Paranoid and Ada is Naive. Does that make sense? So lynch one of us today and the other the next day.

reply to Krisnatharok
This is what I have thus far:

Krisnatharok:

Day One: Brom - Innocent
Day Two: Adalicia - Guilty

Either: Sane or Insane

Kristopher

Day One: Adalicia - Guilty
Day Two: Brom - Guilty

Either: Paranoid or Insane

Archivis

Day One: Adalicia - Guilty
Day Two: Dead

Either: Paranoid or Insane

Adalicia

Day One: Archivis - Innocent
Day Two: Krisnatharok - Innocent

Either: Naive or Sane

Brom

Day One: Krisnatharok - Guilty
Day Two: Kristopher - Innocent

Either: Sane or Insane

So..I have no idea? I think I'm naive but I dunno, I could be sane I guess?

KrisN is either Insane or Mafia, cause I know I'm a cop. Kristopher is either Paranoid or Mafia. Archivis HAD to be Paranoid or Insane, cause I know I'm a cop, which means either KrisN or KrisT is lying...once more, and I'll bet money Brom is sane.

Meaning:

KrisN = Mafia
Kristopher = Paranoid
Archivis = Insane
Adalicia = Naive
Brom = Sane
--
Lore Nerd. Role Player. Raid Leader. Healing Priest. Slightly Annoying. Also Likes Kittens.