Tell me more x
, there is a new speed test available. Give it a try, leave feedback!
dslreports logo
 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery
spc

spacer

Search Topic:
uniqs
14
share rss forum feed

Rekrul

join:2007-04-21
Milford, CT
reply to KrK

Re: Like always

said by KrK:

Some of these proposals are truly very detrimental.... and the sad thing is the US doesn't even act like it's too concerned about this idea, it appears.

Why should it be? It's not like the US would obey any UN created law that they don't agree with.


ctceo
Premium
join:2001-04-26
South Bend, IN
Reviews:
·Virgin Mobile Br..
This will only happen until it (the US) starts treating it's allied states, like Israel, as more of "it's bitch", no offence intended to the people of any of these countries and I'm truly sorry in advance for anything stupid our government does "on our or the worlds behalf". I so tire of that f*n attitude from the US. You have my word that I personally do not condone anything other than self defense. I don't believe in a US only led "InTernational Guard" or any of it's bastardized counterparts.

Instead we need to LEARN from the mistakes presented to us by the emergence of a global society. Whether your a Capitalist, Communist or whatever type of "ist" you are I'm sure you can find some good that comes from each new progression of society and it's cumulative cultural awareness.
--
----
As long as superstition prevails, we will fall short of eradicating war, poverty, and hunger. -J. Fresco

khanacademy.org
en.lernu.net
www.k12.com
churchofreality.org
kopimistsamfundet.se
zeitnews.org
thezeitgeistmovement.com
thevenusproject.com
---


Flibbetigibb

@lmco.com
reply to Rekrul
said by Rekrul:

said by KrK:

Some of these proposals are truly very detrimental.... and the sad thing is the US doesn't even act like it's too concerned about this idea, it appears.

Why should it be? It's not like the US would obey any UN created law that they don't agree with.

And rightly so. The Constitution doesn't give any authority to super-national organizations. The Bill of Rights isn't subject to a vote of foreign dictatorships.

viperlmw
Premium
join:2005-01-25
said by Flibbetigibb :

said by Rekrul:

said by KrK:

Some of these proposals are truly very detrimental.... and the sad thing is the US doesn't even act like it's too concerned about this idea, it appears.

Why should it be? It's not like the US would obey any UN created law that they don't agree with.

And rightly so. The Constitution doesn't give any authority to super-national organizations. The Bill of Rights isn't subject to a vote of foreign dictatorships.

Uhh, there's a whole section about treaties, and how the senate has to ratify them with a 2/3 vote, isn't that then, 'the law'?


Flibbetigibb

@lmco.com
said by viperlmw:

Uhh, there's a whole section about treaties, and how the senate has to ratify them with a 2/3 vote, isn't that then, 'the law'?

Indeed. And I'd like to see any UN-created "law" (there's actually no such thing, but you brought it up) that meets that criteria.


ctceo
Premium
join:2001-04-26
South Bend, IN
Reviews:
·Virgin Mobile Br..
The UN is a "global power base" established by the 1% behind closed doors as a sort of "test" NWO. Right now it's not terribly efficient because it works for the corporate interest of the EU, US & Oil countries right now.

As for a "Bill of rights" I'm pretty sure that document is only a "flower" on the dung pile right now alongside the Constitution, well, the framers version anyway, until our global society breaksdown and reforms.
--
----
As long as superstition prevails, we will fall short of eradicating war, poverty, and hunger. -J. Fresco

khanacademy.org
en.lernu.net
www.k12.com
churchofreality.org
kopimistsamfundet.se
zeitnews.org
thezeitgeistmovement.com
thevenusproject.com
---


KrK
Heavy Artillery For The Little Guy
Premium
join:2000-01-17
Tulsa, OK
reply to Rekrul
They wouldn't have a choice in this case!


ctceo
Premium
join:2001-04-26
South Bend, IN
Correct, If the majority of countries in the UN participate in a vote that sanctions the US or determines that it needs to do something and they don't, bad things would happen, guaranteed.

Crookshanks

join:2008-02-04
Binghamton, NY
reply to viperlmw
said by viperlmw:

Uhh, there's a whole section about treaties, and how the senate has to ratify them with a 2/3 vote, isn't that then, 'the law'?

Look up Reid v. Covert. Treaties can not confer power to the Government free from the restraints of the Constitution.


ctceo
Premium
join:2001-04-26
South Bend, IN
Reviews:
·Virgin Mobile Br..
No, but it does nothing to prevent barry from issuing an executive order in the name of "national security". Since he and his appointed cabinet support a "global order" he said himself that he was willing to effectiovely "create an appropriate legal framework from scratch", essentially to hell with current laws.

ctceo

1 edit
reply to Crookshanks
I'll see your Reid vs. Covert and raise you 1 x Continuity of Operations Presidential directive 51 (NSPD-51) & Raise you by 1x HSPD-20, FCD-1 and FEMA CGC-1.

Also Executive Order 12803 has some importance when looking at the bigger picture here.