site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
299
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


tiger72
SexaT duorP
Premium
join:2001-03-28
Saint Louis, MO
kudos:1

Don't forget..

Don't forget that T-Mobile is agressively refarming their PCS spectrum to offer HSPA+ on. In some areas it's already the case, but in many markets this means that T-Mobile customers with iPhones are now getting 3g on practically empty carriers (ie since most TMO 3g customers are on AWS, most PCS-band HSPA+ cells will practically be dedicated to iPhone users.

And last but not least, with T-Mobile and ATT both deploying LTE on the AWS band, this means that they'll actually be able to have roaming agreements with each other, and share networks if they so choose.

It only took T-Mobile to get pushed into a corner to make a decision that would have saved them a lot of heartache (and money) years ago.
--
"What makes us omniscient? Have we a record of omniscience? ...If we can't persuade nations with comparable values of the merit of our cause, we'd better reexamine our reasoning."
-United States Secretary of Defense (1961-1968) Robert S. McNamara


dmeyer6

join:2002-08-14
Austin, TX

TMO still has no HSPA in AustinTX on the PCS frequencies. My friends' iPhones here on TMO are still clunking along on EDGE.



tiger72
SexaT duorP
Premium
join:2001-03-28
Saint Louis, MO
kudos:1

said by dmeyer6:

TMO still has no HSPA in AustinTX on the PCS frequencies. My friends' iPhones here on TMO are still clunking along on EDGE.

Yeah they're still rolling out said deployment. They only started 7 weeks ago.

bugabuga

join:2004-06-10
Austin, TX

reply to tiger72
Of course the real question should be why they didn't implement HSPA(+) on 1900 as soon as they started to build their 3G service.
This is probably one of the most idiotic decisions ever (unless their primary goal was to force users to buy incompatible handsets and thus having less chance of defecting to ATT or something)
--
Hyperom: Rants about life, politics, technology



tiger72
SexaT duorP
Premium
join:2001-03-28
Saint Louis, MO
kudos:1

said by bugabuga:

Of course the real question should be why they didn't implement HSPA(+) on 1900 as soon as they started to build their 3G service.
This is probably one of the most idiotic decisions ever (unless their primary goal was to force users to buy incompatible handsets and thus having less chance of defecting to ATT or something)

Because all of their customers were already using their relatively small amount of PCS spectrum. The only way to deploy 3g on the PCS band would have been to take away spectrum from their 2g network, which was already heavily loaded. Voice would have degraded. Customers would have seen more dropped calls, and 3g data speeds wouldn't have been particularly great due to them being overloaded.

Spectrum is a hard barrier, and it's extremely well documented that T-Mobile had run out by 2006.
--
"What makes us omniscient? Have we a record of omniscience? ...If we can't persuade nations with comparable values of the merit of our cause, we'd better reexamine our reasoning."
-United States Secretary of Defense (1961-1968) Robert S. McNamara

Saturday, 25-May 23:04:03 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 13.5 years online © 1999-2013 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics