site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
682
Share Topic
Posting?
Post a:
Post a:
Links: ·The Gallery ·Vote! Vote! Vote! ·Forum Guidelines ·DIFAQ ·Reviews ·Permanent Greeting ·User Equp
AuthorAll Replies


rustypixel
Rustypixel

join:2001-03-23
Old Bridge, NJ

[Help] Lens recommandation

Hey all. I got myself a Nikon D80 a few years back and I'm looking to get out a bit more start taking pictures. Other than my daughter who is my absolute favorite subject, I like to take pictures of landscapes and nature in general. I plan a few hiking trips this spring/summer and figure that it will be a great opportunity to take the camera with me and shoot. My question for those that know is, what lens would be most recommended as a companion to the Nikkor 18 - 135mm that came with the kit? Keep in mind that this is nothing more than a hobby but one which I happen to like a great deal and definitely want to pursue more now that I have some time available to me. I also don't have immediate plans to get any more lenses so I'd like to have only one more to round me off a bit. I don't know much about lenses and figured you guys could point me in the right direction.

Thanks for any suggestions.
--
Out of my mind and out of control!


drew
Automatic
Premium
join:2002-07-10
Port Orchard, WA
kudos:6

Rusty -

Are there any scenes that you have found yourself unable to capture due to lens limitation? Coming up with a list (be it small or large) can help us help you.
--
flickr | Of faith, power and glory



ryzst
Premium
join:2004-06-14
Tustin, CA

reply to rustypixel
I bought the D80 a few years ago and did OK with it. My favorite lenses are the Tokina 100mm macro and the Sigma 10-20 wide angle zoom. If you like landscapes, then a wide angle is very handy and also makes a good indoor lens because of the close focusing ability. Check out different reviews at Fred Miranda's & Ken Rockwell's websites. I also like and trust the user reviews at Amazon.com
--
There are more things in heaven and earth, than are dreamt of in your philosophy. ~ W.S.



Jodokast96
Stupid people really piss me off.
Premium
join:2005-11-23
Erial, NJ
kudos:2

reply to rustypixel
You might want to consider going the other way as well. The current lens is probably good enough for the landscapes, so maybe a better lens for your daughter pics? A fast 50mm or 85mm would be great for that, and you'd see an immediate difference with the ability to use a shallower depth of field.

A 100mm f/2.8 macro lens could also do double duty here, giving you a lens better than what you have for portraits, and also something for good close up nature shots.

At the extremes you've got something like the 10-12mm mentioned, which will cover more area than your current lens. Or go the other way and pick up a long zoom lens.

Your budget, of course, will determine exactly what lenses are for you.



rustypixel
Rustypixel

join:2001-03-23
Old Bridge, NJ

reply to rustypixel
Thanks for all the replies and suggestions. To answer Drew, I haven't found any limitations to the lens I have for the simple reason that I haven't used the camera for more than pictures of my daughter. I'm looking to get a little more time with the camera and a few hiking trips I have planned for the spring/summer will be great opportunities to play some more with this.
Someone mentioned the possibility of maybe just having one better lens that covers the bases. I'd be willing to consider that as well. The one area that I might want to delve a little deeper in would be macro photography. Tax refund season is upon us and the budget isn't that low (this time) so I'd be willing to look into anything that is suggested. I'll continue to check here for any more suggestions.

Thanks again for all replies.
--
Out of my mind and out of control!



drew
Automatic
Premium
join:2002-07-10
Port Orchard, WA
kudos:6

If that's the case... Macro lens and a GOOD tripod.



less

@equitrac.com

reply to rustypixel
in the field, it's not a good idea to be changing lenses, cause of the dust and dirt etc. that get on the sensor. so ONE lens similar to the one you have might be useful, say an 18-200, or xx-300.

alternatives, for less money, are a teleconvertor (which though does require taking the lens off and allowing dust, and, for macros, the closeup filter sets for the front of your existing lens, that don't require removing the lens.

if you are thinking of wider wides, you might also consider stitching a few of your regular 18 mm lenses together in computer. to do that, set the camera on manual exposure and manual white balance, so the several images to be stitched are exposed the same.


Tuesday, 21-May 03:28:24 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 13.5 years online © 1999-2013 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics