<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Re: Why bother having an FCC&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Why-bother-having-an-FCC-26959408</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 04:16:00 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 04:16:00 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Why bother having an FCC</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Why-bother-having-an-FCC-26960717</link>
<description><![CDATA[CXM_Splicer posted : I could certainly set up an FM transmitter that would over-power the more distant Manhattan stations!! Good bye Clear Channel... Hello CXM_Splicer Channel  ;)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Why-bother-having-an-FCC-26960717</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 17:55:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Why bother having an FCC</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Why-bother-having-an-FCC-26960179</link>
<description><![CDATA[25139889 posted : yep! which was their primary job! ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Why-bother-having-an-FCC-26960179</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 15:34:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Why bother having an FCC</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Why-bother-having-an-FCC-26960176</link>
<description><![CDATA[25139889 posted : and they was talk about gutting them and starting over but yet you get people that complain about that.  The FCC has NOT adopted any real rules that could improve communications as a whole so they should go. <br><br>They're rulings that did help though; they went back on and it has become just a horse and pony show with nothing more.  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Why-bother-having-an-FCC-26960176</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 15:34:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Why bother having an FCC</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Why-bother-having-an-FCC-26960151</link>
<description><![CDATA[25139889 posted : they were orginally formed for communications services that did not include the internet though. and the FCC decided they did NOT want that Internet as information service back when the X Case was going on with wholesale cable modem services, etc.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Why-bother-having-an-FCC-26960151</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 15:29:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Why bother having an FCC</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Why-bother-having-an-FCC-26960051</link>
<description><![CDATA[openbox9 posted : Or, roll the FCC's pervue back to overseeing spectrum management.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Why-bother-having-an-FCC-26960051</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 15:06:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Why bother having an FCC</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Why-bother-having-an-FCC-26960042</link>
<description><![CDATA[openbox9 posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/855554" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=855554');">bbeesley</a>:</said><p>The Internet is somthing that Congress or any other U.S. legislative body can control or give authority for control over?</p></div>US based networks that form a portion of the Internet, yes.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Why-bother-having-an-FCC-26960042</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 15:04:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Why bother having an FCC</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Why-bother-having-an-FCC-26960036</link>
<description><![CDATA[vpoko posted : Yeah, spectrum free-for-all! Whoever builds the most powerful transmitter wins!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Why-bother-having-an-FCC-26960036</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 15:03:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Why bother having an FCC</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Why-bother-having-an-FCC-26959846</link>
<description><![CDATA[Cheese posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/731982" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=731982');">Somnambul33t</a>:</said><p><div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/891765" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=891765');">Cheese</a>:</said><p>If they have no control? Either they do or they don't and if they don't, why bother?<br> </p></div>i agree. can we finally abolish the FCC now?<br> </p></div>If they are unable to grow a set and put their foot down on this BS, yes, they need to be taken apart. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Why-bother-having-an-FCC-26959846</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 14:25:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Why bother having an FCC</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Why-bother-having-an-FCC-26959837</link>
<description><![CDATA[bbeesley posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1811684" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1811684');">25139889</a>:</said><p> Until Congress gives them the power for the Internet <br> </p></div>The Internet is somthing that Congress or any other U.S. legislative body can control or give authority for control over?<br><br>That must be a really big surprise to the rest of the developed world<br><br>&lt;grin&gt;]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Why-bother-having-an-FCC-26959837</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 14:23:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Why bother having an FCC</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Why-bother-having-an-FCC-26959800</link>
<description><![CDATA[Somnambul33t posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/891765" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=891765');">Cheese</a>:</said><p>If they have no control? Either they do or they don't and if they don't, why bother?<br> </p></div>i agree. can we finally abolish the FCC now?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Why-bother-having-an-FCC-26959800</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 14:15:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Why bother having an FCC</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Why-bother-having-an-FCC-26959686</link>
<description><![CDATA[Cheese posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1811684" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1811684');">25139889</a>:</said><p>and they don't. that's the point that these companies are trying to make. Until Congress gives them the power for the Internet the FCC will keep getting sued until the Courts decide to smack the FCC and their leaders for overstepping the guidelines that govern them.<br><br>And after all the FCC is the one that ruled that the Internet was an Information service to start off with. Not a communications service- hence- Federal Communications Commission NOT the Federal Communications Information Commission. <br> </p></div>The problem I have with this is, they are the FCC, they should already have this power, this is why they were formed. And for the allowment of being able to be sued, is ridiculous. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Why-bother-having-an-FCC-26959686</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 13:44:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Why bother having an FCC</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Why-bother-having-an-FCC-26959620</link>
<description><![CDATA[25139889 posted : and they don't. that's the point that these companies are trying to make. Until Congress gives them the power for the Internet the FCC will keep getting sued until the Courts decide to smack the FCC and their leaders for overstepping the guidelines that govern them.<br><br>And after all the FCC is the one that ruled that the Internet was an Information service to start off with. Not a communications service- hence- Federal Communications Commission NOT the Federal Communications Information Commission. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Why-bother-having-an-FCC-26959620</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 13:27:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Why bother having an FCC</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Why-bother-having-an-FCC-26959539</link>
<description><![CDATA[leo81486 posted : +111~~~]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Why-bother-having-an-FCC-26959539</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 13:11:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Why bother having an FCC</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Why-bother-having-an-FCC-26959408</link>
<description><![CDATA[Cheese posted : If they have no control? Either they do or they don't and if they don't, why bother?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Why-bother-having-an-FCC-26959408</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 12:53:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
