dslreports logo
 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery
spc
Search similar:


uniqs
9438
Expand your moderator at work

Packeteers
Premium Member
join:2005-06-18
Forest Hills, NY
Asus RT-AC3100
(Software) Asuswrt-Merlin

Packeteers to houkouonchi

Premium Member

to houkouonchi

Re: Dual 155/75

houkouonchi - what web sight, service or software agent do you use to generate your up/download history graphs? I was using dslr's monitor, but DHCP changes my IP address so often, that I find updating dslr each time to be a nausance, so I'm looking for anything better that is free
propcgamer
join:2001-10-10
011010101

propcgamer

Member

Looks like MRTG on his router to me.

houkouonchi
join:2002-07-22
Ontario, CA

1 recommendation

houkouonchi to Packeteers

Member

to Packeteers
As propcgamer it is MRTG. My full page is:

»fios.houkouonchi.jp/mrtg/

MRTG can be used to graph just about anything if you give it data. For example:

»fios.houkouonchi.jp/weat ··· oom.html

I personally like MRTG graphs but another tool made by the same person can do some even more advanced graphs:

»oss.oetiker.ch/rrdtool/

I thought DSLR only does latency checking? Like my own latency one is:

»box.houkouonchi.jp/fios1.html

It shows latency and mdev (jitter).

If you use a service like dynDNS that might make dslreports one easier although I can just easily monitor latency if you have a dynDNS account as well. I actually setup bandwidth monitoring for someone at one point which telneted into his westell (I believe) and graphed traffic until the guys IP changed and he didnt hit me back up with it (he didnt have dynamic DNS).

»box.houkouonchi.jp/vz.html

I also keep track of my bandwidth usage (totals) here:

»fios.houkouonchi.jp/bandwidth/
PowerMac
join:2011-03-02
Anaheim, CA

PowerMac to houkouonchi

Member

to houkouonchi
lol, since Verizon FiOS is upping 150mbps speed to 300mbps. Will ur setup will increase from 300mbps to 600mbps? 0__o

Onedollar
join:2001-08-27
Pomona, CA

Onedollar to houkouonchi

Member

to houkouonchi
said by houkouonchi:

said by Onedollar:

You do know a 300 tier is coming right? Couldve saved you some headache

Lies. I was told in November by nycdave that we are looking at atleast 18 months before new speed packages (so 14 months now).

Anyway still no active service. They like had two orders like i would have three lines and they also then later said the 1500G could handle both and had us try that but it never got provisioned. Tech is getting frustrated with dealing people on the phone. Just glad my main connection has not gone down.

Gee look my prediction came true

Smith6612
MVM
join:2008-02-01
North Tonawanda, NY
·Charter
Ubee EU2251
Ubiquiti UAP-IW-HD
Ubiquiti UniFi AP-AC-HD

Smith6612 to PowerMac

MVM

to PowerMac
said by PowerMac:

lol, since Verizon FiOS is upping 150mbps speed to 300mbps. Will ur setup will increase from 300mbps to 600mbps? 0__o

He might need some beefier hardware on both ends for that then!

houkouonchi
join:2002-07-22
Ontario, CA

houkouonchi

Member

said by Onedollar:

said by houkouonchi:

said by Onedollar:

You do know a 300 tier is coming right? Couldve saved you some headache

Lies. I was told in November by nycdave that we are looking at atleast 18 months before new speed packages (so 14 months now).

Anyway still no active service. They like had two orders like i would have three lines and they also then later said the 1500G could handle both and had us try that but it never got provisioned. Tech is getting frustrated with dealing people on the phone. Just glad my main connection has not gone down.

Gee look my prediction came true

Yup. I believed nycdave was correct when he said 18 months. That seemed more likely too.
said by Smith6612:

said by PowerMac:

lol, since Verizon FiOS is upping 150mbps speed to 300mbps. Will ur setup will increase from 300mbps to 600mbps? 0__o

He might need some beefier hardware on both ends for that then!

Current hardware can handle it I believe. The server-side is core i7 style xeon and pretty high end.

I probably will be going dual 300 megabits if the uploads are true on the new speeds if its near what I am paying now.

They say its going from 150/35 -> 300/65 but its really already 150/75. Only reason I have two connetions right now is for the extra upload capacity so if they are not upping the upload at all then I will have no reason to go back to a single connection. if 300/65 is readly 300/150 then I might go back to a single connection.
cramer
Premium Member
join:2007-04-10
Raleigh, NC
Westell 6100
Cisco PIX 501

cramer to houkouonchi

Premium Member

to houkouonchi
Did you get your routing/load balancing sorted out? I dug through my archives for the magic I built a decade ago when I sold linux based LBs. You can use two links to the same gateway with a fair bit of routing configuration. The default link / routing setup will never work correctly (it will always favor one link), but the core linux routing functions can be configured to do it. (I used to make a whole lot of money selling boxes that would.)
serge87
join:2009-11-29
New York

serge87 to Onedollar

Member

to Onedollar
said by Onedollar:

Gee look my prediction came true

Good call

houkouonchi
join:2002-07-22
Ontario, CA

houkouonchi to cramer

Member

to cramer
said by cramer:

Did you get your routing/load balancing sorted out? I dug through my archives for the magic I built a decade ago when I sold linux based LBs. You can use two links to the same gateway with a fair bit of routing configuration. The default link / routing setup will never work correctly (it will always favor one link), but the core linux routing functions can be configured to do it. (I used to make a whole lot of money selling boxes that would.)

Yes. I think I could have manually did it its just that I liked using the web-based management for other things especially automatic fail-over. Also even manually I seem to recall the same gateway on different interfaces traffic would not always go out the intended interface on my colo'd server that does have a manual setup.

I ended up having to just switch one to a dynamic IP. Interesting enough my bill on that one was only $160 and they don't appear to be charging me for phone service anymore. Not sure whats up with that but I will take it.