dslreports logo
 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery
spc
uniqs
20

andyb
Premium Member
join:2003-05-29
SW Ontario

andyb to MaynardKrebs

Premium Member

to MaynardKrebs

Re: CNOC R&V of CRTC 2011-703 and CRTC 2011-704

They are in proceedings now about some of that.

hm
@videotron.ca

hm

Anon

said by MaynardKrebs:

Why doesn't CNOC bring some proceeding to the CRTC which specifically address mandatory response times,

Let's get this shit out in the open and discussed.

said by andyb:

They are in proceedings now about some of that.

In one case Rogers replied saying the fault isn't with them. They state resellers give them info to hook people up, but they have no IP's.

So Rogers is blaming the resellers for this quakery. Which leads to Rogers demanding more money for having to put up with this.

andyb
Premium Member
join:2003-05-29
SW Ontario

andyb

Premium Member

No.Its rogers demanding 5K worth of IP's for hookups that can only 2k worth of subs max.There are no ip4 address's left so rogers needs to clean up their act or implement ipv6.TSI has probably given them enough ip's to do double the amount of customers they have and more.

hm
@videotron.ca

hm

Anon

TY for clarifying that.