dslreports logo
 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery
spc
uniqs
35
45612019 (banned)
join:2004-02-05
New York, NY

45612019 (banned) to iansltx

Member

to iansltx

Re: A 10 GB cap? What a joke.

Yes. I have been. And it was fine.

I'd rather my connection drop down to half its speed during peak hours than be artificially limited to only using it for a tiny fraction of my billing period.
fiberguy2
My views are my own.
Premium Member
join:2005-05-20

fiberguy2

Premium Member

The only thing I can agree with you, so far, is that the way they impose the caps is a bit off the mark to me. They should only need to throttle or over-chage during peak times or on a "smart management" sort of system. Such as once you hit your ceiling and it's peak, then that usage could be charged as a "premium" rate in order to encourage the user to utilize the network during off peak or overnight hours when possible.

Outside of that, you're still way off.
Crookshanks
join:2008-02-04
Binghamton, NY

Crookshanks to 45612019

Member

to 45612019
said by 45612019:

I'd rather my connection drop down to half its speed during peak hours than be artificially limited to only using it for a tiny fraction of my billing period.

Do the rest of us get a vote? You know, those of us who need to occasionally download something big and whom aren't looking to use LTE as a replacement for purpose-designed video delivery systems?
45612019 (banned)
join:2004-02-05
New York, NY

45612019 (banned)

Member

No.