said by ptrowski:You act like this has never been discussed before. We have seen companies, including Comcast, act this way in similar situations before.
Yea...? and?? my response has always been the same. I dont' act like this has never been discussed before,.. no different than everyone else that rushes in here to sheeple Karl's posts about them, right?
This is business as usual, as it should be.. sorry if it sounds cold and harsh, but it's reality.
Do you even know why we are educated on why we should insure BEFORE a disaster happens?
My stance will never change... sorry. For every month that I have to give up some pleasures in life so that I can write those checks to home owners, car insurance, health insurance, and pet health insurance, while others run around with different priorities, my stance won't change.. not one bit. Young people claim they
can't afford renters insurance... ironically, that renters would cover that
iPhone of theirs if it were ever stolen.
I'm still curious.. how many of these people who are outraged about comcast's position on having to pay for the box are insured?
Just as disastrous a burglary/break-in is, or a house fire is, the resident is still responsible. Again, this is why we insure BEFORE an accident happens.
So again.. and???