<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Re: [LA] Two Blue Lights&#x27; in forum &#x27;Cox HSI&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LA-Two-Blue-Lights-26871144</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 02:12:14 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 02:12:14 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: [LA] Two Blue Lights</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LA-Two-Blue-Lights-27097450</link>
<description><![CDATA[bryant313 posted : and its funny how las vegas had the 400mbps upstream speed <br>and i know it was just a test but no one here in las vegas has even reported any upstream channel bonding yet :(]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LA-Two-Blue-Lights-27097450</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 02:39:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [LA] Two Blue Lights</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LA-Two-Blue-Lights-27097428</link>
<description><![CDATA[oldfartjc posted : I don't have any splitters since my house was rewired last summer. The only drop that wasn't rewired is from the round COX connector box by the sidewalk to the COX box on the side of my house and into the attic area, but all checked out OK. They need to redo that drop as it doesn't run in a conduit and is only barely under my rock, then across my driveway and under more rock to the box on the side of my house. I used to show -1 dBmV to -3 dBmV downstream for awhile but now it varies by time of day and I never get those readings anymore. They also put a new amp/splitter up in my attic.<br><br>Below are my readings right now at 11PM.<br><br>Downstream 	Bonding Channel Value<br>Channel ID 	16  	15  	23  	24 <br>Frequency 	855000000 Hz 	849000000 Hz 	873000000 Hz 	879000000 Hz <br>Signal to Noise Ratio 	35 dB 	36 dB 	36 dB 	36 dB <br>Downstream Modulation 	QAM256 	QAM256 	QAM256 	QAM256 <br>Power Level<br>The Downstream Power Level reading is a snapshot taken at the time this page was requested. Please Reload/Refresh this Page for a new reading<br>	-4 dBmV  	-4 dBmV  	-4 dBmV  	-4 dBmV  <br><br>Upstream 	Bonding Channel Value<br>Channel ID 	3  	1  	2 <br>Frequency 	36100000 Hz 	23300000 Hz 	29600000 Hz <br>Ranging Service ID 	99 	99 	99 <br>Symbol Rate 	5.120 Msym/sec 	2.560 Msym/sec 	5.120 Msym/sec <br>Power Level 	47 dBmV 	46 dBmV 	47 dBmV <br>Upstream Modulation 	[3] QPSK<br>[3] 64QAM<br> 	[3] QPSK<br>[2] 16QAM<br>[3] 64QAM<br> 	[3] QPSK<br>[3] 64QAM<br> <br>Ranging Status 	Success 	Success 	Success <br><br>Signal Stats (Codewords) 	Bonding Channel Value<br>Channel ID 	16  	15  	23  	24 <br>Total Unerrored Codewords 	9736234756 	9736235001 	9735936386 	9735936262 <br>Total Correctable Codewords 	223 	181 	218 	139 <br>Total Uncorrectable Codewords 	12850 	12578 	10602 	10826 ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LA-Two-Blue-Lights-27097428</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 02:00:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [LA] Two Blue Lights</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LA-Two-Blue-Lights-27097170</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : i work for tier one tech support for cox, mainly for the arizona market and i have been seeing modems with three upstream channels, the customers seeing that are getting double digit upsteam speeds on any and all speed tests]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LA-Two-Blue-Lights-27097170</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2012 22:47:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [LA] Two Blue Lights</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LA-Two-Blue-Lights-27095454</link>
<description><![CDATA[dvd536 posted : Those downstream power levels are on the low side. got any splitters or old cabling you can lose?<br>SNR is on the low side too[but in spec]]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LA-Two-Blue-Lights-27095454</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2012 03:20:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [LA] Two Blue Lights</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LA-Two-Blue-Lights-27094692</link>
<description><![CDATA[OldDad posted : Same here, only one upstream channel here.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LA-Two-Blue-Lights-27094692</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2012 19:35:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [LA] Two Blue Lights</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LA-Two-Blue-Lights-27094578</link>
<description><![CDATA[oldfartjc posted : Today (4/7/2012) is the first time that I've seen Upstream Bonding. Here is my Modem Signal Page.<br><br>Downstream 	Bonding Channel Value<br>Channel ID 	16  	15  	23  	24 <br>Frequency 	855000000 Hz 	849000000 Hz 	873000000 Hz 	879000000 Hz <br>Signal to Noise Ratio 	35 dB 	35 dB 	36 dB 	36 dB <br>Downstream Modulation 	QAM256 	QAM256 	QAM256 	QAM256 <br>Power Level<br>The Downstream Power Level reading is a snapshot taken at the time this page was requested. Please Reload/Refresh this Page for a new reading<br>	-7 dBmV  	-6 dBmV  	-6 dBmV  	-6 dBmV  <br><br>Upstream 	Bonding Channel Value<br>Channel ID 	3  	1  	2 <br>Frequency 	36100000 Hz 	23300000 Hz 	29600000 Hz <br>Ranging Service ID 	99 	99 	99 <br>Symbol Rate 	5.120 Msym/sec 	2.560 Msym/sec 	5.120 Msym/sec <br>Power Level 	49 dBmV 	47 dBmV 	48 dBmV <br>Upstream Modulation 	[3] QPSK<br>[3] 64QAM<br> 	[3] QPSK<br>[2] 16QAM<br>[3] 64QAM<br> 	[3] QPSK<br>[3] 64QAM<br> <br>Ranging Status 	Success 	Success 	Success ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LA-Two-Blue-Lights-27094578</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2012 18:42:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [LA] Two Blue Lights</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LA-Two-Blue-Lights-27083421</link>
<description><![CDATA[lilstone87 posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1674114" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1674114');">kv2009</a>:</said><p><div class="bquote"><said>said by JeffinKenner :</said><p>I'm only getting one upload channel as of a couple days ago.    I had an upload of 5+, now its only 3.5.   Is that due to the bad weather we are having?  SB6121<br><br>I am still detecting 4 channels for download.<br> </p></div>Looks like upstream bonding was turned off in the area; unless someone in Kenner/Metairie still has it..??  I don't think it's due to the bad weather.<br> </p></div>Very good chance they turned it off. They most likely found a problem that needs time to correct, so they turned the upstream bonding off till they get things like they want them. Comcast did the same thing when they first started upstream bonding, they had multiple markets bonding. Then I guess they found issue's, and turned it off for everyone. Then recently over a month or so ago started turning it back on in the markets that had bonding a while back. So more then likely there was an issue/'s found, decided to turn it off because the problem might of affected customers, and being off at this point means a lot less headaches until they get things where they like it.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LA-Two-Blue-Lights-27083421</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 13:09:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [LA] Two Blue Lights</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LA-Two-Blue-Lights-27082044</link>
<description><![CDATA[kv2009 posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by JeffinKenner :</said><p>I'm only getting one upload channel as of a couple days ago.    I had an upload of 5+, now its only 3.5.   Is that due to the bad weather we are having?  SB6121<br><br>I am still detecting 4 channels for download.<br> </p></div>Looks like upstream bonding was turned off in the area; unless someone in Kenner/Metairie still has it..??  I don't think it's due to the bad weather.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LA-Two-Blue-Lights-27082044</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 02:20:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [LA] Two Blue Lights</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LA-Two-Blue-Lights-27077634</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : I'm only getting one upload channel as of a couple days ago.    I had an upload of 5+, now its only 3.5.   Is that due to the bad weather we are having?  SB6121<br><br>I am still detecting 4 channels for download.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LA-Two-Blue-Lights-27077634</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 23:27:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [LA] Two Blue Lights</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LA-Two-Blue-Lights-27071067</link>
<description><![CDATA[kv2009 posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/377729" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=377729');">dvd536</a>:</said><p><div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1807270" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1807270');">jjohnston123</a>:</said><p>Sorry to bring back an older thread.  But I too had bonding on both up stream and down stream.  It was about 2 weeks ago that I noticed it, and just 3 days ago, I'm back to only bonding my downstream.  I don't know if it was a test run or I'm having problems, yet again with my service.</p></div>Maybe issues were discovered and upstream bond was shut off.<br> </p></div>More than likely - my upstream bonding shut off three days ago, around 6AM.  I tried resetting the modem to defaults and letting it restart but no more upstream bonding.  There must have been something wrong somewhere.<br><br>I did notice some pretty inconsistent upstream speeds lately though.  After the initial burst of 20-24Mbps upstream the speed was reduced to cap.  Then there was fluctuation between 1.0Mbps and 2.8Mbps..it wasn't stable on sustained transfers.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LA-Two-Blue-Lights-27071067</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 23:50:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [LA] Two Blue Lights</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LA-Two-Blue-Lights-27070715</link>
<description><![CDATA[dvd536 posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1807270" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1807270');">jjohnston123</a>:</said><p>Sorry to bring back an older thread.  But I too had bonding on both up stream and down stream.  It was about 2 weeks ago that I noticed it, and just 3 days ago, I'm back to only bonding my downstream.  I don't know if it was a test run or I'm having problems, yet again with my service.</p></div>Maybe issues were discovered and upstream bond was shut off.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LA-Two-Blue-Lights-27070715</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 21:16:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [LA] Two Blue Lights</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LA-Two-Blue-Lights-27070389</link>
<description><![CDATA[ikyuaoki posted : Nice! you got both blue lights on. I'm still waiting for blue upstream light :D in kansas.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LA-Two-Blue-Lights-27070389</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 18:57:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [LA] Two Blue Lights</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LA-Two-Blue-Lights-27070363</link>
<description><![CDATA[jjohnston123 posted : Sorry to bring back an older thread.  But I too had bonding on both up stream and down stream.  It was about 2 weeks ago that I noticed it, and just 3 days ago, I'm back to only bonding my downstream.  I don't know if it was a test run or I'm having problems, yet again with my service.<br><br>I'm in Metairie if that's any help as to where the bonding is going on.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LA-Two-Blue-Lights-27070363</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 18:53:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [LA] Two Blue Lights</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LA-Two-Blue-Lights-26899990</link>
<description><![CDATA[kv2009 posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1771151" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1771151');">Optimus2357</a>:</said><p>I wonder how many upstream channels they had before upstream bonding vs after? I mean channels available. For instance, when ever I am on Channel ID 2, which locally is 28.8Mhz, my upload is 2-3Mbps. When it locks on Channel ID 3, which is 32.2Mhz, I get 7-8Mbps. Same symbol rate, and just about same signal levels (seems I get Channel ID 3 when above 41 Tx) but drastically different performances. And I don't mean here and there, I mean without fail. So I assume the signal requirements for the higher frequency are more strict, so less lock on to it, and thus more bandwidth is available?  So I would be happy with more channels overall opened up, even if they didn't bond on them yet. However that's probably a less effective use of bandwidth, load balancing vs channel bonding I mean. <br><br>I guess my question is; Is DOCSIS 3.0 done the same way across the network? I know it's a standard so it must be similar, but is the way DOCSIS 3.0 executed different in different areas?  <br> </p></div>AFAIK, on my node, there are 4 upstream frequencies now and I am bonded to each of them.  These same 4 frequencies were being pumped through the plant before upstream bonding went active, for quite some time, maybe over a year.   ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LA-Two-Blue-Lights-26899990</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 01:04:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [LA] Two Blue Lights</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LA-Two-Blue-Lights-26892440</link>
<description><![CDATA[dvd536 posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1674114" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1674114');">kv2009</a>:</said><p><div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/377729" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=377729');">dvd536</a>:</said><p><div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1674114" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1674114');">kv2009</a>:</said><p>Speeds are still capped at 3Mbps on the upstream unfortunately.  I don't know when we'll see any true upload speed increase due to the channel bonding but the burst speeds are insane...I've seen it hit 21Mbps regularly, but it always drops back down to capped speeds within seconds.  Hopefully Cox will increase the upstream speed caps.<br> </p></div>Don't hold your breath waiting for that[specially if you're in a non competitive area.<br> </p></div>Yeah lol, unfortunately I know this all too well...but if the bandwidth is there to utilize, I don't see why it wouldn't be something to do.  It seems like a waste of equipment upgrades to channel bond the upstream if you don't plan on increasing speed caps.  There was more than enough upstream bandwidth available before, without channel bonding.</p></div>But if you don't raise upload speeds that allows you to load nodes even heavier before upstream congestion becomes an issue!<br>if upstream becomes congested, downstream speeds suffer.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LA-Two-Blue-Lights-26892440</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 13:24:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [LA] Two Blue Lights</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LA-Two-Blue-Lights-26891691</link>
<description><![CDATA[lilstone87 posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1771151" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1771151');">Optimus2357</a>:</said><p>I wonder how many upstream channels they had before upstream bonding vs after? I mean channels available. For instance, when ever I am on Channel ID 2, which locally is 28.8Mhz, my upload is 2-3Mbps. When it locks on Channel ID 3, which is 32.2Mhz, I get 7-8Mbps. Same symbol rate, and just about same signal levels (seems I get Channel ID 3 when above 41 Tx) but drastically different performances. And I don't mean here and there, I mean without fail. So I assume the signal requirements for the higher frequency are more strict, so less lock on to it, and thus more bandwidth is available?  So I would be happy with more channels overall opened up, even if they didn't bond on them yet. However that's probably a less effective use of bandwidth, load balancing vs channel bonding I mean. <br><br>I guess my question is; Is DOCSIS 3.0 done the same way across the network? I know it's a standard so it must be similar, but is the way DOCSIS 3.0 executed different in different areas?  <br> </p></div>Well there is probably at least a good 4 maybe more upstream channels available for use for internet in your area. I know my area has around 5 upstream channels, which I know about because of a while back having problems with load balancing. Which was causing my modem to bounce around threw all the upstream channels. So channels are there to bond, it just a matter of how many they want to setup for bonding on upstream. Because I am pretty sure when D3 first launched, more upstream channels were added, because of more downstream channels being able to bond, there is a need for more upstream channels being available.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LA-Two-Blue-Lights-26891691</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 10:46:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [LA] Two Blue Lights</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LA-Two-Blue-Lights-26890808</link>
<description><![CDATA[Optimus2357 posted : I wonder how many upstream channels they had before upstream bonding vs after? I mean channels available. For instance, when ever I am on Channel ID 2, which locally is 28.8Mhz, my upload is 2-3Mbps. When it locks on Channel ID 3, which is 32.2Mhz, I get 7-8Mbps. Same symbol rate, and just about same signal levels (seems I get Channel ID 3 when above 41 Tx) but drastically different performances. And I don't mean here and there, I mean without fail. So I assume the signal requirements for the higher frequency are more strict, so less lock on to it, and thus more bandwidth is available?  So I would be happy with more channels overall opened up, even if they didn't bond on them yet. However that's probably a less effective use of bandwidth, load balancing vs channel bonding I mean. <br><br>I guess my question is; Is DOCSIS 3.0 done the same way across the network? I know it's a standard so it must be similar, but is the way DOCSIS 3.0 executed different in different areas?  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LA-Two-Blue-Lights-26890808</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 02:58:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [LA] Two Blue Lights</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LA-Two-Blue-Lights-26890772</link>
<description><![CDATA[kv2009 posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/377729" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=377729');">dvd536</a>:</said><p><div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1674114" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1674114');">kv2009</a>:</said><p>Speeds are still capped at 3Mbps on the upstream unfortunately.  I don't know when we'll see any true upload speed increase due to the channel bonding but the burst speeds are insane...I've seen it hit 21Mbps regularly, but it always drops back down to capped speeds within seconds.  Hopefully Cox will increase the upstream speed caps.<br> </p></div>Don't hold your breath waiting for that[specially if you're in a non competitive area.<br> </p></div>Yeah lol, unfortunately I know this all too well...but if the bandwidth is there to utilize, I don't see why it wouldn't be something to do.  It seems like a waste of equipment upgrades to channel bond the upstream if you don't plan on increasing speed caps.  There was more than enough upstream bandwidth available before, without channel bonding.<br><br>I should mention that I'm on the premier plan.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LA-Two-Blue-Lights-26890772</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 01:53:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [LA] Two Blue Lights</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LA-Two-Blue-Lights-26886495</link>
<description><![CDATA[dvd536 posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1674114" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1674114');">kv2009</a>:</said><p>Speeds are still capped at 3Mbps on the upstream unfortunately.  I don't know when we'll see any true upload speed increase due to the channel bonding but the burst speeds are insane...I've seen it hit 21Mbps regularly, but it always drops back down to capped speeds within seconds.  Hopefully Cox will increase the upstream speed caps.<br> </p></div>Don't hold your breath waiting for that[specially if you're in a non competitive area.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LA-Two-Blue-Lights-26886495</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 06:44:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [LA] Two Blue Lights</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LA-Two-Blue-Lights-26885271</link>
<description><![CDATA[kv2009 posted : Speeds are still capped at 3Mbps on the upstream unfortunately.  I don't know when we'll see any true upload speed increase due to the channel bonding but the burst speeds are insane...I've seen it hit 21Mbps regularly, but it always drops back down to capped speeds within seconds.  Hopefully Cox will increase the upstream speed caps.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LA-Two-Blue-Lights-26885271</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 19:45:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [LA] Two Blue Lights</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LA-Two-Blue-Lights-26884439</link>
<description><![CDATA[ajwees41 posted : could also be noise on the two channels not bonded.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LA-Two-Blue-Lights-26884439</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 14:42:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [LA] Two Blue Lights</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LA-Two-Blue-Lights-26883992</link>
<description><![CDATA[lilstone87 posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1773912" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1773912');">OldDad</a>:</said><p>I guess I'm not fully bonded on the upstream. Only 2-channel bonding here. <br><br>Upload speed has increased from 2.8 to 6.23 .. nice improvement.<br> </p></div>Anything more then one is consider bonding, just because your not locked onto 4 channels doesn't mean much. The people in the LA market were just lucky the cox guys working in there area lit up all 4 channels at the launch of upstream bonding.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LA-Two-Blue-Lights-26883992</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 11:50:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [LA] Two Blue Lights</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LA-Two-Blue-Lights-26883691</link>
<description><![CDATA[OldDad posted : I guess I'm not fully bonded on the upstream. Only 2-channel bonding here. <br><br>Upload speed has increased from 2.8 to 6.23 .. nice improvement.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LA-Two-Blue-Lights-26883691</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 09:50:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [LA] Two Blue Lights</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LA-Two-Blue-Lights-26881805</link>
<description><![CDATA[lilstone87 posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1736472" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1736472');">XIII</a>:</said><p>Nice. Lets hope they role it out soon to everyone<br> </p></div>Well there is some upstream bonding happening in AZ, in the Glendale area. As one of the users on here mention he was locked onto two upstream channels in Glendale. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LA-Two-Blue-Lights-26881805</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 15:17:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [LA] Two Blue Lights</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LA-Two-Blue-Lights-26881682</link>
<description><![CDATA[XIII posted : Nice. Lets hope they role it out soon to everyone]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LA-Two-Blue-Lights-26881682</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 14:33:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [LA] Two Blue Lights</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LA-Two-Blue-Lights-26880573</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : How does this look?<br><br>Channel ID &#9;229  &#9;230  &#9;231  &#9;232<br>Frequency &#9;849000000 Hz &#9;855000000 Hz &#9;861000000 867000000 Hz<br>Signal to Noise Ratio &#9;36 dB &#9;36 dB &#9;36 dB &#9;36 dB<br>Downstream Modulation &#9;QAM256 &#9;QAM256 &#9;QAM256 &#9;QAM256<br>Power Level<br>The Downstream Power Level reading is a snapshot taken at the time this page was requested. Please Reload/Refresh this Page for a new reading<br>&#9;0 dBmV  &#9;0 dBmV  &#9;-1 dBmV  &#9;0 dBmV<br><br>Upstream &#9;Bonding Channel Value<br>Channel ID &#9;4  &#9;1  &#9;2  &#9;3<br>Frequency &#9;34450000 Hz &#9;24850000 Hz &#9;28050000 Hz &#9;31250000 Hz<br>Ranging Service ID &#9;6143 &#9;6143 &#9;6143 &#9;6143<br>Symbol Rate &#9;2.560 Msym/sec &#9;2.560 Msym/sec &#9;2.560 Msym/sec &#9;2.560 Msym/sec<br>Power Level &#9;39 dBmV &#9;39 dBmV &#9;40 dBmV &#9;39 dBmV<br>Upstream Modulation &#9;[3] QPSK<br>[2] 16QAM<br> &#9;[3] QPSK<br>[2] 16QAM<br> &#9;[3] QPSK<br>[2] 16QAM<br> &#9;[3] QPSK<br>[2] 16QAM]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LA-Two-Blue-Lights-26880573</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 03:22:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [LA] Two Blue Lights</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LA-Two-Blue-Lights-26871702</link>
<description><![CDATA[dvd536 posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1773912" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1773912');">OldDad</a>:</said><p>6120 modem, I now have two blue lights instead of the one, no speed differences, still 4 channels, etc. Why the two now?<br> </p></div>Upstream bonding will ease congestion if it exists on the upstream channel. bonding upstream doesn't mean upload speeds will be raised but it allows for it if provider wants to give more.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LA-Two-Blue-Lights-26871702</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:27:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [LA] Two Blue Lights</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LA-Two-Blue-Lights-26871199</link>
<description><![CDATA[bryant313 posted : you should post your modems signal page so we can take a look at these new glorious upstream channels that have been bonded :D]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LA-Two-Blue-Lights-26871199</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 20:41:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [LA] Two Blue Lights</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LA-Two-Blue-Lights-26871161</link>
<description><![CDATA[lilstone87 posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1773912" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1773912');">OldDad</a>:</said><p>6120 modem, I now have two blue lights instead of the one, no speed differences, still 4 channels, etc. Why the two now?<br> </p></div>Well if its both your receive, and send lights, it means your now  channel bonding both ways. So if your Send light is blue that means bonding on upstream.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LA-Two-Blue-Lights-26871161</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 20:33:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>[LA] Two Blue Lights</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/LA-Two-Blue-Lights-26871144</link>
<description><![CDATA[OldDad posted : 6120 modem, I now have two blue lights instead of the one, no speed differences, still 4 channels, etc. Why the two now?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/LA-Two-Blue-Lights-26871144</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 20:29:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
