 drewAutomaticPremium join:2002-07-10 Port Orchard, WA kudos:6 | [CritEditY] Studio Work Canon EOS 7D 21mm 1/200th F8 ISO200
Setup before the Qbox arrived |  Canon EOS 7D 70mm 1/200th F8 ISO200
Resulting photo |  Canon EOS 7D 93mm 1/250th F8 ISO400
|  Canon EOS 7D 70mm 1/200th F8 ISO200
|
I worked some overtime a few weeks back and picked up some gear! •Cheetah Qbox 24 Softbox •Westcott "PhotoBasics" 5-in-1 reflector with air-cushioned stand and holding arm. •Rosco "Strobist" 55-gel pack •DGK Grey/White/Black card set •Savage Seamless 107" wide "Fashion Grey" paper
I had cleaned out the garage finally and ended up mounting a 120" wooden closet rod to the rafters to hold a backdrop. I have a very fun makeshift studio. Here are some shots from the past couple days. Pardon the same subject(s)... only have myself, the wife and kid(s) to shoot.
I'm not a super creative shooter, (as is obvious), but I think I'm starting to get decent results. I want to focus on being able to consistently produce an desired effect, even if it's super-standard (Rembrant, etc.)
What do you guys and gals think? -- "And Tehuno said let there be haste, not mp5, and there was haste. All creatures of the world rejoiced." -WotLK Ch. 3.3.2 |
|
 Jodokast96Stupid people really piss me off.Premium join:2005-11-23 Erial, NJ kudos:2 | said by drew:What do you guys and gals think? I think you've got a lot of diapers.  |
|
|
|
 drewAutomaticPremium join:2002-07-10 Port Orchard, WA kudos:6 | Two kids... Lots of clothes, lots of diapers. Diapers go in the garbage; clothes don't. Kids out grow clothes, where to put them? Use the diaper boxes! -- "And Tehuno said let there be haste, not mp5, and there was haste. All creatures of the world rejoiced." -WotLK Ch. 3.3.2 |
|
 Jodokast96Stupid people really piss me off.Premium join:2005-11-23 Erial, NJ kudos:2 | LOL. Yup, been there, done that. |
|
 SandSharkLong may you runPremium,MVM join:2000-05-23 Santa Fe, TX kudos:3 | reply to drew Nice results! |
|
 drewAutomaticPremium join:2002-07-10 Port Orchard, WA kudos:6 | Thanks SandShark. Is there anything, good or bad, that stands out to you? |
|
 SandSharkLong may you runPremium,MVM join:2000-05-23 Santa Fe, TX kudos:3 | I like the catchlights. That's something I always look for in portraits. Your little girl is adorable. I remember when mine was that age. I envy you because doing something like this has always been at the top of my list of photography things to try. Maybe the next time you get some extra overtime, you can add a hair and a background light, along with a canvas or muslin background and do some serious portraits. But, like I said, I really like the results so far and where you're going with it. I see better things down the road, which is what it's all about, right? |
|
 jaykaykay4 Ever YoungPremium,MVM join:2000-04-13 Scottsdale, AZ kudos:22 | reply to drew I am really no judge of this kind of photography, but can definitely tell you that you seem to be going the right way. I, too, like the lights you've captured, and you couldn't have got a cuter subject than that little lady. |
|
 SueSPremium join:2007-05-16 Macon, MO kudos:2 2 edits | reply to drew The light looks fine for the set up you are using. You might try different apertures for more background separation. Shooting straight on like the first and last portrait is usually not the most pleasing poses for most people, especially women, just something to think about when shooting . Notice how shooting at a different angle (second portrait) gives your face more depth, or 3d effect than the others. I prefer a portrait crop on all three, there is nothing in the background we need to see.
I would lighten the irises just a little on your little girl using a lasso, and do a curves adjustment, but that is just a personal preference, and certainly not necessary.
Just my opinions.
Cute little girl! |
|
 drewAutomaticPremium join:2002-07-10 Port Orchard, WA kudos:6 | Thanks Sue for the feedback. One question... the backgrounds are an almost solid color due to the gel... is there not separation already? -- "And Tehuno said let there be haste, not mp5, and there was haste. All creatures of the world rejoiced." -WotLK Ch. 3.3.2 |
|
 SueSPremium join:2007-05-16 Macon, MO kudos:2 | Separation probably wasn't the best word. A bigger F/stop might give it a more blurred look and make it look farther away or fade away. I could probably be wrong, but it is something I would try. |
|
 StacyFotoDoguePremium join:2001-11-02 New York, NY | reply to drew Lighting isn't bad but I think the little girl could use a bit more fill. Did you really buy green seamless or is that a color imbalance? The washing machine and other objects in the background look rather green too. Personally I would've gone with something more neutral like white or gray seamless.
Or by any chance did you leave some fluorescent lights on? |
|
 drewAutomaticPremium join:2002-07-10 Port Orchard, WA kudos:6 | Nope Stacy, that's grey seamless. I have it gelled (in that shot, showing the setup for a thread on POTN) with two 1/3rd CTGreen gels I have from Rosco.
I really need to figure out how to position the reflector better than I do. It's hard with speedlights and not studio strobes with modeling lights. -- "And Tehuno said let there be haste, not mp5, and there was haste. All creatures of the world rejoiced." -WotLK Ch. 3.3.2 |
|
 StacyFotoDoguePremium join:2001-11-02 New York, NY | In that case I would just ditch the gels.. but that's personal taste. I think Sue makes a good point about separating the subject from the background. Opening up the aperture and using a longer focal length might help. |
|
 SandSharkLong may you runPremium,MVM join:2000-05-23 Santa Fe, TX kudos:3 | said by Stacy:I think Sue makes a good point about separating the subject from the background. Honestly, I can't tell how far the subject is from the background since there is no, for lack of a better word, texture in the background. How are you and SueS able to determine how much separation there is? |
|
 SueSPremium join:2007-05-16 Macon, MO kudos:2 | said by SandShark:said by Stacy:I think Sue makes a good point about separating the subject from the background. Honestly, I can't tell how far the subject is from the background since there is no, for lack of a better word, texture in the background. How are you and SueS  able to determine how much separation there is? Of course I can't tell for sure either, but I think it is more of a look I am thinking about. It is something he can try if he wants, it was only a suggestion. In another reply I mentioned that separation probably wasn't the correct word to use. |
|
 drewAutomaticPremium join:2002-07-10 Port Orchard, WA kudos:6 | The answer is about 5, maybe 6, feet.
I still don't understand what exactly you're talking about, but next time I'm shooting out there, I'll open the lens up a bit and see what you're talking about (I hope)! -- "And Tehuno said let there be haste, not mp5, and there was haste. All creatures of the world rejoiced." -WotLK Ch. 3.3.2 |
|
 SueSPremium join:2007-05-16 Macon, MO kudos:2 | It is quite possible that the look I am thinking about can only be achieved with the addition of a hair light. I would still be interested in what they will look like with a bigger aperture. Open the lens as much as you can.  |
|
 drewAutomaticPremium join:2002-07-10 Port Orchard, WA kudos:6 | I'm slightly worried about opening it up to f/4. At the distance I have available to work with, we're talking about anywhere from 1/3rd of a foot of DOF (70mm, f/4, distance 6ft) to .08 ft (135mm, f/4, distance 6ft). We'll see  -- "And Tehuno said let there be haste, not mp5, and there was haste. All creatures of the world rejoiced." -WotLK Ch. 3.3.2 |
|
 SueSPremium join:2007-05-16 Macon, MO kudos:2 | I take snapshots of my grands at F/1.8 to F/2.8 and I am about 6 to 10 feet away. Just play it is fun.  |
|