site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Posting?
Post a:
Post a:
Links: ·Forum Rules ·Forum FAQ ·FTP Modes & Ports ·Linksys Home
AuthorAll Replies


wayjac
Premium,MVM
join:2001-12-22
Indy

reply to goodtimeokc

Re: Can't get WRT54GL (Tomato) to work with Netopia 3000!

said by goodtimeokc:

When I follow those instructions I get the "DHCP Aqcuisition"

This sounds like the 3347 has it's wan dhcp client enabled
Below is a picture of the 3347 wan ip interface page with the correct settings


goodtimeokc

join:2012-05-14

Tried this and I still show 0.0.0.0 as the WAN IP on the router. When I do this, the Internet light still lights up on the modem, so it's still apparently doing the PPPoE auth. Should I be setting "Enable System Bridge" in addition to setting the ATM to "RFC-1483 Bridged Ethernet vcc1"? If not, how to you prevent the modem from doing the PPPoE auth?



wayjac
Premium,MVM
join:2001-12-22
Indy

Ok, here's a different set of instructions for you to try
I would factory reset the 3347 before following the instructions

Click the configure link
Click the advanced link.
Click the ethernet bridge link
Place a checkmark in the enable system bridge checkbox
Click the lan link
Select none in the restrictions drop-down menu
Click the yellow triangle/icon under the help link
Click the save and restart link


goodtimeokc

join:2012-05-14

I've tried enabling system bridge with Restrictions set to "None" and "Admin Disabled". Doesn't seem to matter.

Interestingly, I was able to use bridge mode by creating a PPPoE connection directly from Windows 7, so it does appear to be some sort of router incompatibility after all. Both routers I've tried worked flawlessly with my old 2Wire modem in bridge mode, so I'm not sure why they would be incompatible with the Motorola.



wayjac
Premium,MVM
join:2001-12-22
Indy

If you can use the windows pppoe client and it gets a public ip address the 3347 is in bridge mode
Are you sure the routers wan port is set to use pppoe



wayjac
Premium,MVM
join:2001-12-22
Indy

reply to goodtimeokc
If you can allow the 3347 to make the pppoe connection you can use the 3347 ip passthrough option this will work just as well as bridge mode


goodtimeokc

join:2012-05-14

said by wayjac:

If you can allow the 3347 to make the pppoe connection you can use the 3347 ip passthrough option this will work just as well as bridge mode

Does this disable all routing on the modem? I've tried disabling NAT on the modem but then none of the LAN clients (behind the router) can access the internet. Do you happen to know the proper steps for setting up IP passthrough?

goodtimeokc

join:2012-05-14

reply to wayjac

said by wayjac:

If you can allow the 3347 to make the pppoe connection you can use the 3347 ip passthrough option this will work just as well as bridge mode

Alright, I ended up setting the router to DHCP and enabling IP-Passthrough on the modem and it worked! I don't think I really gain anything by having the router do PPPoE auth so this should be perfect. Thanks!

The only thing I'm not sure about is whether IP-Passthrough disables NAT for the specified device. I suppose if I run into any problems I can create pinholes (port forwarding) for all ports on the router...


wayjac
Premium,MVM
join:2001-12-22
Indy

said by goodtimeokc:

I don't think I really gain anything by having the router do PPPoE auth so this should be perfect

I agree with this comment
said by goodtimeokc:

The only thing I'm not sure about is whether IP-Passthrough disables NAT for the specified device

Check the tcp/ip info of the ip passthrough device
When ip passthrough is configured correctly the device will have a public ip address, a public gateway ip address, and public dns ip addresses
The dhcp ip address is private and it's needed for lan access
said by goodtimeokc:

I suppose if I run into any problems I can create pinholes (port forwarding) for all ports on the router...

If you have any pinholes set up on the 3347 you should delete them that will force all unsolicited internet traffic/ports to the dlink

dpunkz

join:2012-06-15

I have basically the same problem with the same exact situation and equipment. I didn't really understand how you bridged them. I Tried doing the things you suggested,but they didn't work. Can anyone help me through here or teamviewer with me. Thanks


Friday, 24-May 18:08:14 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 13.5 years online © 1999-2013 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics