Re: 1921 vs 891 Throughput Testing

Author

All Replies

cooldude9919

join:2000-05-29
Cape Girardeau, MO
kudos:5

Here are some real world production tests from me. Both had IPS and zbfw on the interface. 1921 looks to be around ~60-70% faster in these tests.

891 router
 
NAT  60% CPU
30 second input rate 37836000 bits/sec, 3142 packets/sec
  30 second output rate 723000 bits/sec, 1582 packets/sec
 
No NAT
F0030001#sh proc cpu
CPU utilization for five seconds: 55%/53%; one minute: 39%; five minutes: 24%
 30 second input rate 35795000 bits/sec, 3163 packets/sec
  30 second output rate 500000 bits/sec, 939 packets/sec
 
1921 router
 
NAT
F0030001#sh proc cpu
CPU utilization for five seconds: 37%/36%; one minute: 24%; five minutes: 13%
 
 30 second input rate 36010000 bits/sec, 3252 packets/sec
  30 second output rate 1011000 bits/sec, 1815 packets/sec
     499657 packets input, 615665550 bytes, 0 no buffer
 
No NAT
 
F0030001#sh proc cpu
CPU utilization for five seconds: 32%/31%; one minute: 30%; five minutes: 32%
 PID Runtime(ms)     Invoked      uSecs   5Sec   1Min   5Min TTY Process
 
30 second input rate 37019000 bits/sec, 3339 packets/sec
  30 second output rate 893000 bits/sec, 1094 packets/sec

to forum · permalink · 2012-05-23 12:57:27 ·

Equipment Support > Hardware By Brand > Cisco > 1921 vs 891 Throughput Testing

Re: 1921 vs 891 Throughput Testing