dslreports logo
site
 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery
spc

spacer




how-to block ads


Search Topic:
uniqs
118
share rss forum feed

hga

join:2008-05-09
Joplin, MO

1 edit

1 recommendation

It's probably about the money

Maybe that is the key here, getting another $15/month?

I suspect so, given that I recently read that the going rate for public IPv4 addresses is around that much, although with some research it looks like that depends on quantity. This site (»tradeipv4.com/) is quoting a single figure of $8 (that's for a sale; $1/year to lease).

So AT&T gets to repurpose a large quantity of valuable addresses and you get to pay an additional $15 per month for the privilege of getting the same level of service you've been getting since you got your connection from them.

This would be in character for a company who's CEO in 2006 ignited the Net Neutrality firestorm with some fantastically ill chosen comments (»www.businessweek.com/magazine/co···8092.htm) ; among other things it was estimated this cost AT&T a billion dollars when they later bought Bell South....

It could also help explain how people are being forced to "upgrade" to U-verse DSL from plain DSL. I'm stuck with plain AT&T DSL, if they extend this policy/architecture to us I won't like paying nearly 50% more to enjoy the same service.

(Why do I stick with them? Not even sure if the local cable monopoly will serve us and AT&T's service is rock solid for me and my family in this town.)


morbo
Complete Your Transaction

join:2002-01-22
00000
Reviews:
·Charter

said by hga:

(Why do I stick with them? Not even sure if the local cable monopoly will serve us and AT&T's service is rock solid for me and my family in this town.)

Maybe you should at least see if it's an option -- unless you are content paying $15 more per month for the same service.