<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;double dip&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/double-dip-27194188</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 18:45:46 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 18:45:46 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: double dip</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-double-dip-27198250</link>
<description><![CDATA[miscDude posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1726066" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1726066');">balur</a>:</said><p><div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/201506" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=201506');">Skippy25</a>:</said><p>Cable and Satellite providers are doing those broadcasters just as big of a favor, if not bigger, by making it available through them to more people in a better quality. </p></div>Better quality? The world of OTA Analog is over. Broadcasts OTA now are almost always HD, and will be crystal clear (you'll either get it or you won't). Generally it will be better then over cable because they won't be compressing it to save bandwidth.<br> </p></div>I think that generally,  MSO's aren't allowed to compress or further change the signal that they get from the OTA broadcast stations. Pretty much it's a straight pass thru as far as the programs themselves go. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-double-dip-27198250</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 14:28:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: double dip</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-double-dip-27195764</link>
<description><![CDATA[balur posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/201506" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=201506');">Skippy25</a>:</said><p>Cable and Satellite providers are doing those broadcasters just as big of a favor, if not bigger, by making it available through them to more people in a better quality. </p></div>Better quality? The world of OTA Analog is over. Broadcasts OTA now are almost always HD, and will be crystal clear (you'll either get it or you won't). Generally it will be better then over cable because they won't be compressing it to save bandwidth.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-double-dip-27195764</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 19:48:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: double dip</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-double-dip-27194754</link>
<description><![CDATA[ISurfTooMuch posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1759429" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1759429');">tvoldtimer</a>:</said><p>How is that a double dip?  Broadcasters send their signal over the air for free.  Cable and Satellite providers take that free signal and the bundle it with the rest of their offerings and charge the consumers for it.  Broadcasters are simply taking their cut of the fee cable is charging you for free TV. <br> </p></div>That signal is <b>NOT</b> free for the cable and satellite companies if the broadcaster chooses retransmission consent over must carry, which most of the major broadcasters are doing now.  That's why you hear about the blackouts of broadcast stations on cable and satellite every few months--the broadcaster wants more money than the cable or sat company is willing to pay.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-double-dip-27194754</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 15:01:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: double dip</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-double-dip-27194337</link>
<description><![CDATA[Skippy25 posted : Cable and Satellite providers are doing those broadcasters just as big of a favor, if not bigger, by making it available through them to more people in a better quality.<br><br>I have always thought this industry is ass backwards and find it quite silly that cable / sat had to pay to retransmit anyway. It should have been a gentleman's agreement as they both help line the pockets of each other and both would greatly suffer without the other.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-double-dip-27194337</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 13:15:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: double dip</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-double-dip-27194302</link>
<description><![CDATA[tvoldtimer posted : How is that a double dip?  Broadcasters send their signal over the air for free.  Cable and Satellite providers take that free signal and the bundle it with the rest of their offerings and charge the consumers for it.  Broadcasters are simply taking their cut of the fee cable is charging you for free TV. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-double-dip-27194302</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 13:06:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>double dip</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/double-dip-27194188</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : You can watch the show free with an antenna. But if I pay a cable  or satellite provider the network gets paid twice, once from the add company the other from the provider. They just want to double dip but yet the pirate just downloads it without adds and doesn't pay the provider. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/double-dip-27194188</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 12:35:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
