site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
70844
Share Topic
Posting?
Post a:
Post a:
Links: ·Forum Rules ·Forum FAQ ·Bandwidth Limits/Congestion Management ·Copyright Infringement?
page: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 ... 28 · 29 · 30
AuthorAll Replies


Chris 313
Come get some
Premium
join:2004-07-18
Houma, LA

reply to anon5324

Re: [Speed] Northeast speed changes coming.

Or better. One that does 32 channels: »www.lightreading.com/document.as···lr_cable


IowaCowboy
Want to go back to Iowa
Premium
join:2010-10-16
Springfield, MA

reply to aguiar0016
What about areas in the Northeast like Springfield, MA that cannot get FiOS but are upgraded to D3.



Morac
Cat god

join:2001-08-30
Riverside, NJ
kudos:1
Reviews:
·Comcast

said by IowaCowboy:

What about areas in the Northeast like Springfield, MA that cannot get FiOS but are upgraded to D3.

I'm assuming that won't matter. For example I can't get FIOS at my location, but it's available in the next town over from me. Both my town and that town are in the same local Comcast area. As such I get the benefits for any upgrades/specials that Comcast makes to compete with FIOS in the next town over even though I can't get FIOS.
--
The Comcast Disney Avatar has been retired.

relish

join:2009-07-21
Sterling Heights, MI

reply to aguiar0016
Nice thread! After reading the FIOS Quantum announcement, I scrambled to the forums hoping to find a post like this.

This gives Comcast 6 months to roll out to all DOCSIS 3.0 markets by the end of the year. Michigan was one of the last states to receive the DOCSIS 3.0 upgrade, but now that the infrastructure is in place, I suspect the speed changes are only a matter of sending a config file update to their boxes. After all, I could get 100Mb right now if I wanted, so the capacity on their networks should be there. For those in other cities who waited FOREVER for DOCSIS 3.0, I don't think these speed changes will be as painful as a wait because the infrastructure is already there.

That's also an awesome article Chris 313. Just when I thought DOCSIS 3.0 hit its limits, they find a way to add more channels. I always loved the idea of fiber, but if cable can keep up, I think I can be content for a while. Just need to heighten those monthly caps...



Chris 313
Come get some
Premium
join:2004-07-18
Houma, LA
Reviews:
·Comcast
·AT&T U-Verse
·Comcast Digital ..

Yes indeed. My area just got 16/2 a little over a year ago. Still no D3 goodies in sight until the end of the year or into 2013. So, speed upgrades/changes would be most welcome. If I went from 16/2 to 50/? it'd be worth the wait, but there's another thing. The 50 tier has been out for 5 years now and hasn't seen much upgrading. Wonder how long it'll take them to upgrade that to the new 75 speed that FiOS is rolling out now.

As for raising caps, see here: »Comcast to Raise Caps, Start Charging Overage Fees

As for the 32 channel modem, I want one. Getting something and probably not having to upgrade for years suits me well equipment wise. Now, if I get that 50 speed rumored here, I'll have to upgrade my router. Anything past 32-35 and I'll top out. And I want every bit of speed I pay almost 60 for.



gate1975mlm
Premium
join:2001-09-30
united state
kudos:8

reply to aguiar0016

said by aguiar0016:

Comcast is changing their blast and extreme 50 tiers in the northeast only. Blast is going to 50 download and extreme 50 goes to 105 download. Extreme 105 goes away and customers get a price decrease. No mention of upload speeds. This will happen within 90 days. Notification being sent out to customers.

So does this mean the whole Philadelphia area will be getting these great speed upgrades too?

aguiar0016

join:2006-01-23
New Bedford, MA

reply to IowaCowboy
You should be able to get the speeds.



Anon2482

@comcast.net

reply to TriForce
No Comcast didnt piss themselves, Verizon pissed themselves when Comcast upped their speeds to 10Gbps. I assure you Verizon is playing follow the leader not vice versa, and still they are only offering up to 300Mbps as opposed to Comcasts 10Gbps, yes with a G.



Morac
Cat god

join:2001-08-30
Riverside, NJ
kudos:1
Reviews:
·Comcast

said by Anon2482 :

No Comcast didnt piss themselves, Verizon pissed themselves when Comcast upped their speeds to 10Gbps. I assure you Verizon is playing follow the leader not vice versa, and still they are only offering up to 300Mbps as opposed to Comcasts 10Gbps, yes with a G.

Comcast is incapable of providing speeds anywhere close to 10Gbps over cable. The fastest the D3 standard allows is 300 Mbps.

If you are talking about Comcast Enterprise service, you do realize that's done completely over fiber and isn't even really done by Comcast. They contract out to a 3rd party company for the fiber link and even that service doesn't offer a 10Gbps connection.
--
The Comcast Disney Avatar has been retired.


TriForce

join:2008-05-27
Chico, CA
Reviews:
·Comcast

reply to Anon2482

said by Anon2482 :

No Comcast didnt piss themselves, Verizon pissed themselves when Comcast upped their speeds to 10Gbps. I assure you Verizon is playing follow the leader not vice versa, and still they are only offering up to 300Mbps as opposed to Comcasts 10Gbps, yes with a G.

Where can you get 10Gbps at home? That's enterprise only service. This is Comcast's response to FiOS upgrades.

hclarkjr

join:2002-08-09
Hostetter, PA

reply to aguiar0016
can not wait!!! hopefully it is real soon



PeteC2
Got Mouse?
Premium,MVM
join:2002-01-20
Bristol, CT
kudos:6
Reviews:
·Comcast
·AT&T Yahoo

reply to aguiar0016
Makes sense to me since here in CT there really is a fairly narrow difference between the Performance (which I have) and Blast tiers.

Here is what I have with ShaperProbe:

DiffProbe release. January 2012. Build 1008.
Shaper Detection Module.

Connected to server 217.163.1.74.

Estimating capacity:
Upstream: 3843 Kbps.
Downstream: 24736 Kbps.

The measurement will take upto 2.5 minutes. Please wait.

Checking for traffic shapers:

Upstream: Burst size: 5042-5107 KB;
Shaping rate: 2053 Kbps.

Downstream: Burst size: 4790-5151 KB;
Shaping rate: 20197 Kbps.

For more information, visit: »www.cc.gatech.edu/~partha/diffprobe

Although the upstream capacity of Blast is decent, the downstream difference is hardly worth the cost differential from what I can see. Based on today's speeds it makes sense to increase the difference, and drop an unecessary tier, both simplifying and clarifying the tiers.

The reality is that they are in effect dropping the current Blast tier, but borrowing the name since having Blast 50 and Extreme 105 makes better sense name-wise from a marketing aspect.
--
Deeds, not words


iansltx

join:2007-02-19
Golden, CO
kudos:2

reply to Morac
Correction: Comcast might contract for building out the fiber to a given location, but once that's done they own the network end-to-end. That said, you're looking at $30,000 or more for that connection per month.


jtavarez

join:2011-10-27
Plainfield, NJ

reply to aguiar0016
As long as comcast has bandwith caps and overages it will never be competitive with FIOS-Who needs a quatrillion gigabit per second if you have to wait a month until cap resets



Anon2482

@comcast.net

reply to Morac
I do understand all of that, I work for Comcast Enterprise Service and it is in fact done on our own Fiber network 70% of the time the other 30% of the time is due to serviceability of our footprint and utilize level 3 in these cases so we can provide service across the country, UP TO 10Gbps.



Mike Wolf

join:2009-05-24
Beachwood, NJ
kudos:3
Reviews:
·Comcast

reply to aguiar0016
This is going to cause alot of headaches in various departments within Comcast. Namely technical support and the headend managers pushing new configuration files to a boat load of modems. Looks like triple overtime pay



swintec
Premium,VIP
join:2003-12-19
Alfred, ME
kudos:4
Reviews:
·RapidVPS
·Sprint Mobile Br..
·VoicePulse
·RoadRunner Cable

said by Mike Wolf:

This is going to cause alot of headaches in various departments within Comcast. Namely technical support and the headend managers pushing new configuration files to a boat load of modems. Looks like triple overtime pay

How is this any different than any other speed increase? A few key strokes and the modems that are supposed to have it, will.
--
Usenet Block Accounts | Unlimited Accounts


Mike Wolf

join:2009-05-24
Beachwood, NJ
kudos:3
Reviews:
·Comcast

Because of the elimination of a higher speed tier configuration file, modems programmed with that file would go offline causing tech support calls and truck rolls which ideally would like to be avoided. After the IPv6 fiasco with the Netgear modems, all eyes are on everyone. In other speed increases, the configuration file isn't replaced, it's usually just modified.

Anyway it's going to require the extra work by rebooting and adjusting each affected account's modem individually.



Morac
Cat god

join:2001-08-30
Riverside, NJ
kudos:1
Reviews:
·Comcast

said by Mike Wolf:

Because of the elimination of a higher speed tier configuration file, modems programmed with that file would go offline causing tech support calls and truck rolls which ideally would like to be avoided. After the IPv6 fiasco with the Netgear modems, all eyes are on everyone. In other speed increases, the configuration file isn't replaced, it's usually just modified.

Anyway it's going to require the extra work by rebooting and adjusting each affected account's modem individually.

I don't see why this need be complicated. There are a number of things Comcast could do:

1. Leave the original higher speed tier configuration file in place and simply adjust the speeds in the Blast and old 50 Mbps file.

2. Bump up the speeds in the Blast and 50 Mbps tiers. Then switch all 100 Mbps users to the new 100 Mbps configuration file and delete the old high speed tier configuration file.

3. Remove the low speed tier and simply change the configuration files for Blast and 50 Mbps users to the 50 Mbps and 100 Mbps configuration files.

My guess is that there are very few users on the 100 mbps tier compared to the current Blast and 50 Mbps tiers so #2 above would require the least amount of changes to users accounts. Well technically #1 would, but then there's duplicate configuration files.

Blast and 50 Mbps users will have to reboot their modems to get the new speeds anyway. 100 Mbps users won't have to reboot, but when they do in the future, they'll pull in the new 100 Mbps config file.

It shouldn't be any more complicated than any other speed boost. Switching current 100 Mbps users over to the new configuration file could be automated, but even if it could not, like I said I doubt there are that many 100 Mbps users.
--
The Comcast Disney Avatar has been retired.


EG
The wings of love
Premium
join:2006-11-18
Union, NJ
kudos:9

FWIW, these days, the config files in the modem actually point to the correct rate limits for the provisioned / subscribed to speeds on the CMTS config. Rates are controlled at and by the CMTS.

page: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 ... 28 · 29 · 30

Friday, 24-May 11:44:37 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 13.5 years online © 1999-2013 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics