dslreports logo
 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery
spc

spacer

Search Topic:
uniqs
586
share rss forum feed

Chubbysumo

join:2009-12-01
Superior, WI
Reviews:
·Charter

Why not get two 150mbps lines???

Anyone notice that it would be much cheaper(and faster upload) to get two of the 150mbps lines and then load balance them? the price increase makes no damn sense, other than to drive people away from it(so Verizon can say "we offered and people didnt want it).


Noah Vail
Son made my Avatar
Premium
join:2004-12-10
SouthAmerica
kudos:3
Reviews:
·Bright House Net..
said by Chubbysumo:

Anyone notice that it would be much cheaper(and faster upload) to get two of the 150mbps lines and then load balance them?

Load balancing doesn't increase speed, though.

To get 300Mb out of a pair of 150Mb connections, you'd need to bond them using an end point that has 300+Mb capacity.
--
The Dark Tower's Skynet evolves from 4chan.


elios

join:2005-11-15
Springfield, MO
said by Noah Vail:

said by Chubbysumo:

Anyone notice that it would be much cheaper(and faster upload) to get two of the 150mbps lines and then load balance them?

Load balancing doesn't increase speed, though.

To get 300Mb out of a pair of 150Mb connections, you'd need to bond them using an end point that has 300+Mb capacity.

it wouldnt surprise me if thats what there doing to get that speed as it is


Noah Vail
Son made my Avatar
Premium
join:2004-12-10
SouthAmerica
kudos:3
Reviews:
·Bright House Net..
said by elios:

it wouldnt surprise me if thats what there doing to get that speed as it is

My understanding is that the areas served by the older BPON COs don't offer 150/Mb+. I think they max out at 50MBs.

However GPON COs technically support 2.4Gb/1.2Gb.
So Vz wouldn't need bonding to achieve the top tiers.

My guess is that bonding isn't in fiber-optic's future.
Instead, increased spectrum within a fiber-optic line will be developed to meet higher demand.
--
The Dark Tower's Skynet evolves from 4chan.

Chubbysumo

join:2009-12-01
Superior, WI
Reviews:
·Charter
reply to elios
said by elios:

said by Noah Vail:

said by Chubbysumo:

Anyone notice that it would be much cheaper(and faster upload) to get two of the 150mbps lines and then load balance them?

Load balancing doesn't increase speed, though.

To get 300Mb out of a pair of 150Mb connections, you'd need to bond them using an end point that has 300+Mb capacity.

it wouldnt surprise me if thats what there doing to get that speed as it is

Two load balanced 150mbps connections would net you 300mbps download and 130mbps upload. Load balancing is to take 2 connections and make your internal network think its a single wideband connection.


Simba7
I Void Warranties

join:2003-03-24
Billings, MT
said by Chubbysumo:

Two load balanced 150mbps connections would net you 300mbps download and 130mbps upload. Load balancing is to take 2 connections and make your internal network think its a single wideband connection.

That's bonding. Load balancing is spreading out multiple connections over multiple lines.

If you download from one site, you're only going to max out a single pipe.. not both. If you bond them, then several connections can act as one.
--
Bresnan 30M/5M | CenturyLink 5M/896K
MyWS[PnmIIX3@3.3G,8G RAM,500G+1.5T+2T HDDs,Win7]
WifeWS[A64@2G,2G RAM,120G HDD,Win7]
Router[2xP3@1G,2G RAM,18G HDD,Allied Telesyn AT2560FX,2xDigital DE504,Sun X1034A,2xSun X4444A,SMC 8432BTA,Gentoo]

iansltx

join:2007-02-19
Austin, TX
kudos:2
reply to Chubbysumo
Load balancing doesn't do that for peak speeds. Bonding (e.g. Sharedband or the like) does. The thing is, in order to get an uncapped Sharedband connection it's $50 per month for two lines. So you'd be paying $250 for 300/130, not $200.

jjeffeory

join:2002-12-04
USA
reply to Chubbysumo
If they're not bonded, you're not going to get 1 300mbps connection.