site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
1920
Share Topic
Posting?
Post a:
Post a:
Links: ·FiOS Map ·Vz FiOS FAQ ·General Fiber Optics ·Vz FiOS Monitors ·Submit a FAQ
AuthorAll Replies


lolwatpear

@verizon.net

Problem with port forwarding on secondary router...

Hi, i've been researching this for the past couple of hours. I have a westell 9100EM and a e2500. The e2500 is my secondary router. I have it set up currently so the e2500 is giving out the 2.4ghz and 5ghz signal while the westell's wireless is disables.

I then realized that I couldn't port forward on my 360 no matter what I did. I finally found some threads talking about secondary router configs that make port forwarding work. I just need help setting one up. I found the list: »Verizon Online FiOS FAQ »What are the tradeoffs between the various router configurations (i'm guessing this translates fine to westell).

I need to know, what is recommended? I believe I have the 3. Secondary LAN-to-LAN setup right now, but even putting my 360 in the DMZ doesn't work (I have no clue why it doesn't port forward when I've have that exact conig). My main problem is that i've never been able to get a WAN-to-LAN connection to access the internet. I just don't know what i'm doing wrong.

I'd like to do 2. Secondary DMZ, so I can port forward on the e2500 because it has a better interface. I'm just confused with the subnet and other static IP entries. When I finally got a static IP, and I attempted to DMZ it on the westell, it gave me an error.

hubrisnxs

join:2009-12-30
Fountain Valley, CA
kudos:1

It's very rarely a good idea to have two routers that are port forwarding to one another.

You are usually setting yourself up for trouble. The DMZ is the way to go.

The westell will sometimes give you an error, most of the time it's a false negative, so just hit ok, and test it anyways. if it works then everything was just fine.

»www.pcwintech.com/common-problem···rwarding


gadgetboyj

join:2009-08-25
Staten Island, NY
kudos:2

said by hubrisnxs:

The DMZ is the way to go.

+1

viafax999

join:2000-06-03
Westford, MA

reply to lolwatpear
I have a 9100em sitting at 192.168.1.1 it's connected LAN to WAN to a Netgear wnd3700 at address 192.168.30.1. It in turn is connected LAN to WAN to a Dlink dir655 at address 192.168.3.1. Wireless is turned on on all devices. Have no issues port forwarding from the outside to any of the subnets.
Basically all you have to do is to define each of the lower routers as a fixed address on the parent subnet E.G. have the Netgear at 192.168.1.254 then add a port forward rule at the Westell for anythinge destined to a lower subnet to be routed to 192.168.1.254 port xxx. Then at the lower subnet either route the port to the lower router or to the IP address of the listening device.


lolwatpear

join:2012-07-03
Wesley Chapel, FL

reply to lolwatpear
i've tried absolutely everything at this point. the only thing the made port forwarding work was actually connecting my main computer to the westell and not the e2500. this isn't too bad of a solution, but no other device can port forward on my network, but my computer. i'll explain what I did. I don't understand why it wouldn't work:

1. changed the e2500 static ip to 192.168.1.5 (wasn't really changed, but i enabled it, linksys set it up automatically)
2. I went under dmz in my westell and entered 192.168.1.5
3. changed my main computer's static ip to 192.168.0.9
4. went to portforwarding settings in the e2500 and added port 6891 to static ip 192.168.0.9
5. I test it with an online port tester and it's closed.
6. At this point I disable various things, one at a time, testing to see if it will fix the problem. I disable the firewalls, upnp on both routers, etc. I even add the port with static ip to the westell, and nothing.

what could possibly be the problem?


gadgetboyj

join:2009-08-25
Staten Island, NY
kudos:2

I have an Apple Time Capsule and Actiontec router set up in the same way, with my router in the DMZ. Something I noticed is that even if the port is forwarded, it does not seem to work from within the internal network unless i also forward the port specifically in the Actiontec. For example, I have a web server on port 80. If I forward the port on my router, from outside of my network, let's say from a neighbor's house, I'm able to access the server. If I'm in the local network, I cannot access that web server unless I type in the IP of the server, or go into the Actiontec UI and specifically tell it to forward port 80 to my Apple router.



More Fiber
Premium,MVM
join:2005-09-26
West Chester, PA
kudos:28

reply to lolwatpear

said by lolwatpear:

I couldn't port forward on my 360 no matter what I did.

I assume you mean to the 360.
said by lolwatpear:

I found the list: »Verizon Online FiOS FAQ »What are the tradeoffs between the various router configurations (i'm guessing this translates fine to Westell).

Yes. From the first paragraph of the FAQ:
quote:
References to the Actiontec router apply to all models of the Actiontec and to the Westell 9100EM, unless specified otherwise
said by lolwatpear:

I need to know, what is recommended?

That very much depends on your individual circumstances and what you're trying to accomplish. There is no one option that is right for everyone.
said by lolwatpear:

putting my 360 in the DMZ doesn't work (I have no clue why it doesn't port forward when I've have that exact config).

The DMZ of which router?

Option #3 is a LAN-to-LAN configuration. This means the LAN side of both routers are on the same subnet (192.168.1.x). The WAN side of the Linksys is not used. Portforwarding (or DMZ) is only effective on the primary router (Westell).
said by lolwatpear:

My main problem is that I've never been able to get a WAN-to-LAN connection to access the internet.

A LAN-to-WAN connection is option #1 or #2, not option #3.
For option #2, did you set the Linksys WAN to an IP address on the Westell LAN (192.168.1.x) and also set the Linksys LAN to a different subnet (i.e. not 192.168.1).
It appears you used 192.168.1.5 in your subsequent post
said by lolwatpear:

I'd like to do 2. Secondary DMZ, so I can port forward on the e2500 because it has a better interface.

IMO, not the best option. You'll have to put the Linksys in the Westell's DMZ and create the port forwards on the Linksys. Xboxes don't like being double natted.
said by lolwatpear:

When I finally got a static IP, and I attempted to DMZ it on the Westell, it gave me an error.

Make sure the static IP address of the Linksys WAN is outside of the Westell's DHCP range (assuming option #2 here).
--
There are 10 kinds of people in the world; those who understand binary and those who don't.

hubrisnxs

join:2009-12-30
Fountain Valley, CA
kudos:1

Let me give a recommendation. It will help eliminate the possibility that you may not be PF correctly.

So give your Linksys it's own static. 192.168.1.200 or .50 (stay away from the .100 range if you have FiOS tv. The set top boxes use .100

Then erase your pf rules in the linksys.

Go to the actiontec and add the linksys to your dmz.
Go to the actiontec and kill any PF rules associated with what you are doing

Download simpleportforwarding.com tool and let it do the PF rules for you.

It's free and will configure it all correctly the first time.

Then try your applications again and see if you're still getting a problem.


lolwatpear

join:2012-07-03
Wesley Chapel, FL

Thanks for the advice, but this tool didn't do anything different then what i've done. it's a great tool that i'll use in the future if i can figure this out. ill show you some pics to see if it can help:

1. »imageshack.us/f/221/deluge.jpg/

port i'm trying to forward.

2. »imageshack.us/f/341/routerstaticip.jpg/

here's the static IP I made for my e2500.

3. »imageshack.us/f/526/dmz.jpg/

dmz'd it on westell and removed all pfing rules.

4. »imageshack.us/f/713/computerstaticip.jpg/

created static ip for computer.

5. »imageshack.us/f/33/portforwardi.jpg/

used port forwarding tool to set up ports (not any different then what I did manually).

6. »imageshack.us/f/705/portchecker.jpg/

still closed.


hubrisnxs

join:2009-12-30
Fountain Valley, CA
kudos:1

Ok, so you opened the ports on the router.

are both sides open and active and listening, and did you add the PF rules to your PC as well in the windows firewall or whatever other third party firewall?


lolwatpear

join:2012-07-03
Wesley Chapel, FL

i already tried turning off the windows firewall and it made no difference. what do you mean "both sides open and active and listening"? I also tried opening the ports on the westell even with dmz enabled and nothing happened.

the port immediately opens when I directly connect my Ethernet to my westell due to the westell's upnp. that's the only thing that has worked.


PittsPgh
Premium
join:2003-08-21
Pittsburgh, PA
kudos:1

If you are doing the option #3 Lan to Lan, then you only need to port forward on the main/first router. Disable the port forwarding rules on the second router.
It works. I have a couple wireless IP cameras using the wireless N on the second router.

Actiontec main router, and NetGear second router here.


lolwatpear

join:2012-07-03
Wesley Chapel, FL

it's lan (westell) to wan (linksys)


lolwatpear

join:2012-07-03
Wesley Chapel, FL

reply to lolwatpear
here's an update: I ended up disabling dhcp on my secondary router, which may have been the problem. I port forwarded to the port in deluge and it is open. I was happy, but then i wanted to make sure it was working by forwarding other ports.

So I did, and the problem is that literally the only port i can open, the one that is in deluge. for instance, the deluge port is 56789. If i copy those exact setting but change it to say 56789 (or anything for that matter), port checkers will say it's closed. Why would this be the case?


Thursday, 23-May 11:24:58 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 13.5 years online © 1999-2013 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics