| reply to markofmayhem
Re: FSF Publishes Important Whitepaper on Secure Boot said by markofmayhem:said by FF4m3 :I'm OK with your analysis and allowing it to be posted. Huh? To allow means power to disallow exists... explain? Geesh man, it's not rocket science. This is a moderated public forum. You and the rest of us are permitted to post.
Anyway, dispensing with all the previous drama, I've sent the FSF a link to the this thread. |
|
 markofmayhemWhy not now?Premium
join:2004-04-08
Pittsburgh, PA
kudos:5
 ·Comcast
| said by FF4m3 :Geesh man, it's not rocket science. This is a moderated public forum. You and the rest of us are permitted to post.
Anyway, dispensing with all the previous drama, I've sent the FSF a link to the this thread.
C'mon, man, register... you've contributed to this forum long enough to deserve being timely placed in-line 
And couldn't you find a pro-Linux article to post once-in-a-while? Please
--
Show off that hardware: join Team Discovery and Team Helix |
|
| said by markofmayhem:And couldn't you find a pro-Linux article to post once-in-a-while? Please
I've been running Linux for almost 15 years and am a 100% FOSS supporter.
I support free speech and an open exchange of differing perspectives, even through disagreement.
I do not favor intentional OS lockouts and resulting unrequested and undesirable user constraints. |
|
| reply to FF4m3
said by FF4m3 :I've sent the FSF a link to the this thread. Here's the response:
From: Jeanne Rasata via RT [info@fsf.org]
Sent: 07/04/12 12:06 PM
Subject: [gnu.org #764416] "Secure Boot" Whitepaper
Thank you very much for your feedback. We will look into it.
Thanks for supporting free software.
Sincerely,
j.
--
Jeanne Rasata
Program Assistant
Free Software Foundation |
|
