<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Re: &#x26;quot;Rogers is not required to honour what an agent says&#x26;qu&#x27; in forum &#x27;Rogers&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-quotRogers-is-not-required-to-honour-what-an-agent-saysqu-27192064</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 12:25:03 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 12:25:03 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: g777</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-g777-27333951</link>
<description><![CDATA[Tx posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1835123" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1835123');">04193189</a>:</said><p>no delusions at all ... it's a matter of <b>rights</b> and <b>law</b> which most men have forgotten, never learned or have been lied to and deceived by government, business, corporations and rest of their rip-off agents<br><br>that's what happens to those who watch too much tv, cop shows, listen to bogus police, who didn't expand their education past school, get drunk and become dumb, consume fluoride via water and toothpaste, get poisoned by supermarket food, consume poisonous drugs from big pharma, and rest of poisoning system<br><br>it's time to put the corrupt, thieves and abusers back in their place<br> </p></div>Still waiting for this thread of yours]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-g777-27333951</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2012 13:59:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: &#x26;quot;Rogers is not required to honour what an agent says&#x26;qu</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-quotRogers-is-not-required-to-honour-what-an-agent-saysqu-27329999</link>
<description><![CDATA[bitablespore posted : I also has problems with Rogers not honouring what I was promised (they wanted to charge me an early cancellation fee for my DVR rental, when I was told it was absolutely free for one year, no strings).  I escalated all the way to the office of the president with no luck getting it resolved.  I then decided to cancel my cable, internet, mobile phone and magazine subscriptions with them.  I am a very happy customer using other providers for my services.<br><br>I would never recommend Rogers for anything, and I warn anyone I can.<br><br>Bitablespore]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-quotRogers-is-not-required-to-honour-what-an-agent-saysqu-27329999</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2012 22:20:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: g777</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-g777-27329843</link>
<description><![CDATA[04193189 posted : no delusions at all ... it's a matter of <b>rights</b> and <b>law</b> which most men have forgotten, never learned or have been lied to and deceived by government, business, corporations and rest of their rip-off agents<br><br>that's what happens to those who watch too much tv, cop shows, listen to bogus police, who didn't expand their education past school, get drunk and become dumb, consume fluoride via water and toothpaste, get poisoned by supermarket food, consume poisonous drugs from big pharma, and rest of poisoning system<br><br>it's time to put the corrupt, thieves and abusers back in their place]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-g777-27329843</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2012 21:06:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>g777</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/g777-27325409</link>
<description><![CDATA[JAC70 posted : Wow. Delusions of grandeur as well.  Back on your meds, pal.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/g777-27325409</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 10:28:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: &#x26;quot;Rogers is not required to honour what an agent says&#x26;qu</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-quotRogers-is-not-required-to-honour-what-an-agent-saysqu-27324820</link>
<description><![CDATA[04193189 posted : ah, you seem to have missed the rest of what i posted pat .. it starts here: &raquo;<A HREF="/forum/r27247723-DSL-attn-Rocky-.-TekSavvy-Bell-PROBLEMS">[DSL] attn Rocky .. TekSavvy & Bell PROBLEMS</A><br>... which you should very well know as you left many comments there <br>.. which is also missing some pertinent posts, as they were deleted.<br>be advised ... i'm still building a topic which will cover all of the above and more and as i have time :)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-quotRogers-is-not-required-to-honour-what-an-agent-saysqu-27324820</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 03:13:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: &#x26;quot;Rogers is not required to honour what an agent says&#x26;qu</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-quotRogers-is-not-required-to-honour-what-an-agent-saysqu-27324739</link>
<description><![CDATA[Tx posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1835123" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1835123');">04193189</a>:</said><p>obviously you haven't figured out who i am nor the extent of my knowledge from what i've said up to this point LOL<br>your comments are made to intimidate instead of inform .. are you done yet?<br> </p></div>Extent of your knowledge?  Are you serious?  Asking me if I'm done yet?  <br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="/postlist/1835123?cat=within">/postlist/1835&middot;&middot;&middot;t=within</A><br><br>Browse that please.  Read what you've ranted about since you became a member, then ask your very intellectual self who is done. <br><br>Who you are?  Who cares, if you're a regular member who signed up under another name, it's not funny.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-quotRogers-is-not-required-to-honour-what-an-agent-saysqu-27324739</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 01:26:13 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: &#x26;quot;Rogers is not required to honour what an agent says&#x26;qu</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-quotRogers-is-not-required-to-honour-what-an-agent-saysqu-27324464</link>
<description><![CDATA[04193189 posted : obviously you haven't figured out who i am nor the extent of my knowledge from what i've said up to this point LOL<br>your comments are made to intimidate instead of inform .. are you done yet?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-quotRogers-is-not-required-to-honour-what-an-agent-saysqu-27324464</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2012 23:15:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: &#x26;quot;Rogers is not required to honour what an agent says&#x26;qu</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-quotRogers-is-not-required-to-honour-what-an-agent-saysqu-27317133</link>
<description><![CDATA[Tx posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1835123" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1835123');">04193189</a>:</said><p>Nice try .. u must file fee schedule beforehand and make it fully known via canada gazette, this way everyone knows. Also u seem to miss the part that "God" is the supreme law .. which means according to bible and or ancient records .. then all other laws below this. <br>Admiralty Business is at the bottom of the list. ;) .. It's also considered as extortion, deception and fraud.<br>Anything based on debt is outright fraud!<br> </p></div>lol, some of your posts remind me of some of the nigeria scams i read about.  Just how you go on and on with your nonsense]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-quotRogers-is-not-required-to-honour-what-an-agent-saysqu-27317133</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2012 23:20:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: &#x26;quot;Rogers is not required to honour what an agent says&#x26;qu</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-quotRogers-is-not-required-to-honour-what-an-agent-saysqu-27317130</link>
<description><![CDATA[Tx posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1835123" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1835123');">04193189</a>:</said><p>not my problem .. try checking procedures or take a bar law course. :)<br> </p></div>Bud, you're far from a lawyer.  Your typing, spelling etc says it.  You talk like a ranting solicitor.  You're one of the craziest people i've ever seen on these forums and you almost top the most crazy i've ever seen on any forums.<br><br>Sound like a crazy preacher that tries to spew nonsense propaganda and it's all i've seen since you started posting.<br><br>You sure as heck haven't passed the bar, any respected lawyer wouldn't be ranting and raving like you are.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-quotRogers-is-not-required-to-honour-what-an-agent-saysqu-27317130</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2012 23:18:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: &#x26;quot;Rogers is not required to honour what an agent says&#x26;qu</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-quotRogers-is-not-required-to-honour-what-an-agent-saysqu-27316872</link>
<description><![CDATA[04193189 posted : not my problem .. try checking procedures or take a bar law course. :)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-quotRogers-is-not-required-to-honour-what-an-agent-saysqu-27316872</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2012 21:46:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: &#x26;quot;Rogers is not required to honour what an agent says&#x26;qu</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-quotRogers-is-not-required-to-honour-what-an-agent-saysqu-27315200</link>
<description><![CDATA[JAC70 posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1835123" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1835123');">04193189</a>:</said><p>Nice try .. u must file fee schedule beforehand and make it fully known via canada gazette, this way everyone knows. Also u seem to miss the part that "God" is the supreme law .. which means according to bible and or ancient records .. then all other laws below this. <br>Admiralty Business is at the bottom of the list. ;) .. It's also considered as extortion, deception and fraud.<br>Anything based on debt is outright fraud!<br> </p></div>I just listened to the Tom Cruise Scientology interview this morning and I have to say, Tom made more sense than this guy.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-quotRogers-is-not-required-to-honour-what-an-agent-saysqu-27315200</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2012 13:37:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: &#x26;quot;Rogers is not required to honour what an agent says&#x26;qu</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-quotRogers-is-not-required-to-honour-what-an-agent-saysqu-27313751</link>
<description><![CDATA[04193189 posted : Nice try .. u must file fee schedule beforehand and make it fully known via canada gazette, this way everyone knows. Also u seem to miss the part that "God" is the supreme law .. which means according to bible and or ancient records .. then all other laws below this. <br>Admiralty Business is at the bottom of the list. ;) .. It's also considered as extortion, deception and fraud.<br>Anything based on debt is outright fraud!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-quotRogers-is-not-required-to-honour-what-an-agent-saysqu-27313751</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2012 01:15:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: &#x26;quot;Rogers is not required to honour what an agent says&#x26;qu</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-quotRogers-is-not-required-to-honour-what-an-agent-saysqu-27307582</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1726066" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1726066');">balur</a>:</said><p>Well in that case, im going to go file a fee schedule against you, your posts took me a few minutes to read, my times worth a million dollars a minute in my mind... So 3 million please. Ill go file it with the AG and you'll be required to pay, despite the fact you never agreed to pay me anything.<br><br>YAY Im a millionaire, careful or I'll bring you to court over it.<br> </p></div>MATCH POINT<br><br>WINNER!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-quotRogers-is-not-required-to-honour-what-an-agent-saysqu-27307582</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2012 20:24:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Rogers is not required to honour what an agent says</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Rogers-is-not-required-to-honour-what-an-agent-says-27307589</link>
<description><![CDATA[QuantumPimp posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1835123" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1835123');">04193189</a>:</said><p>Rogers again .. LMAO<br>There's only one way for anyone to get satisfaction when such a company is that corrupt ... <b>Take them to court.</b><br> </p></div>Wow. Whoever says that Rogers or Bell does not have to honor what an agent says is mis-informed. The provider may not *want* to honor an agreement but a court will enforce the terms of the contract that were negotiated with the agent.<br><br>But really, as a consumer, who has time to litigate this stuff? If you want to continue doing business then dialog is the fastest and easiest solution.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Rogers-is-not-required-to-honour-what-an-agent-says-27307589</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2012 19:50:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: &#x26;quot;Rogers is not required to honour what an agent says&#x26;qu</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-quotRogers-is-not-required-to-honour-what-an-agent-saysqu-27307335</link>
<description><![CDATA[balur posted : Well in that case, im going to go file a fee schedule against you, your posts took me a few minutes to read, my times worth a million dollars a minute in my mind... So 3 million please. Ill go file it with the AG and you'll be required to pay, despite the fact you never agreed to pay me anything. <br><br>YAY Im a millionaire, careful or I'll bring you to court over it.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-quotRogers-is-not-required-to-honour-what-an-agent-saysqu-27307335</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2012 17:41:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: &#x26;quot;Rogers is not required to honour what an agent says&#x26;qu</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-quotRogers-is-not-required-to-honour-what-an-agent-saysqu-27307154</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1835123" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1835123');">04193189</a>:</said><p><div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1726066" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1726066');">balur</a>:</said><p>It's never too late to sue... and claiming that your time is worth $10,000 over a $100 a month service isn't ridiculous.<br> </p></div>True ... once that fee schedule is filed with attorney general then that's what any offender has to pay.<br>This is about teaching big business a lesson by paying a substantial penalty for their transgressions. Most fail to realize big businesses make Millions & Billions .. if not Trillions.<br>I've seen fee schedules of around 10 Million per hr.<br> </p></div>LOL not true because no one agreed to pay you anything an hr so you get nothing.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-quotRogers-is-not-required-to-honour-what-an-agent-saysqu-27307154</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2012 17:22:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: &#x26;quot;Rogers is not required to honour what an agent says&#x26;qu</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-quotRogers-is-not-required-to-honour-what-an-agent-saysqu-27306301</link>
<description><![CDATA[mlerner posted : I'm not surprised the rep lied or was incompetant but generally Rogers issues wireless credit with a time expiration usually 1 year or the 3 years (the end of your contract). At that point you then need to re-negotiate a new contract with retentions.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-quotRogers-is-not-required-to-honour-what-an-agent-saysqu-27306301</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2012 09:25:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: &#x26;quot;Rogers is not required to honour what an agent says&#x26;qu</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-quotRogers-is-not-required-to-honour-what-an-agent-saysqu-27305997</link>
<description><![CDATA[04193189 posted : We'll see who's out of their mind as we, many of us, are preparing cases to take all major ISP's to task.<br>Mindset of being a controlled little puppy and doing as you're told by system is what's wrong in this country ... and as is clearly evident on DSLR as well.<br>What's really at stake here is the freedom and future of <b>our</b> internet. Protests haven't worked, complaints to CRTC either, or any of the other schemes.<br>The only thing the corporations, businesses and their agents understand is money ... therefore it's the only way to fight them peacefully.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-quotRogers-is-not-required-to-honour-what-an-agent-saysqu-27305997</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2012 01:22:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: &#x26;quot;Rogers is not required to honour what an agent says&#x26;qu</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-quotRogers-is-not-required-to-honour-what-an-agent-saysqu-27305970</link>
<description><![CDATA[Tx posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1835123" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1835123');">04193189</a>:</said><p>That's right .. and if i didn't suggest it to user then he'd still be getting crap service with crappy lines and getting ripped off. And, please get it right: it's TSI and Bell .. mostly Bell's fault.<br>BTW: For over 2 yrs customer has been getting ripped off without Bell doing the right thing. <br> </p></div>You're absolutely out of your mind.  You have topped the list of DSLR weirdos.  No offence but you go on and on and on about it and spam your youtube channel.  You remind me of a door to door solicitor.  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-quotRogers-is-not-required-to-honour-what-an-agent-saysqu-27305970</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2012 01:00:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: &#x26;quot;Rogers is not required to honour what an agent says&#x26;qu</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-quotRogers-is-not-required-to-honour-what-an-agent-saysqu-27305934</link>
<description><![CDATA[04193189 posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1726066" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1726066');">balur</a>:</said><p>It's never too late to sue... and claiming that your time is worth $10,000 over a $100 a month service isn't ridiculous.<br> </p></div>True ... once that fee schedule is filed with attorney general then that's what any offender has to pay.<br>This is about teaching big business a lesson by paying a substantial penalty for their transgressions. Most fail to realize big businesses make Millions & Billions .. if not Trillions.<br>I've seen fee schedules of around 10 Million per hr.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-quotRogers-is-not-required-to-honour-what-an-agent-saysqu-27305934</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2012 00:43:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: &#x26;quot;Rogers is not required to honour what an agent says&#x26;qu</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-quotRogers-is-not-required-to-honour-what-an-agent-saysqu-27305923</link>
<description><![CDATA[04193189 posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1726066" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1726066');">balur</a>:</said><p>It's never too late to sue... and claiming that your time is worth $10,000 over a <$100 a month service isn't ridiculous.<br> </p></div>True ... once that fee schedule is filed with attorney general then that's what any offender has to pay.<br>This is about teaching big business a lesson by paying a substantial penalty for their transgressions. Most fail to realize big businesses make Millions & Billions .. if not Trillions.<br>I've seen fee schedules of around 10 Million per hr.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-quotRogers-is-not-required-to-honour-what-an-agent-saysqu-27305923</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2012 00:30:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: &#x26;quot;Rogers is not required to honour what an agent says&#x26;qu</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-quotRogers-is-not-required-to-honour-what-an-agent-saysqu-27305900</link>
<description><![CDATA[04193189 posted : That's right .. and if i didn't suggest it to user then he'd still be getting crap service with crappy lines and getting ripped off. And, please get it right: it's TSI and Bell .. mostly Bell's fault.<br>BTW: For over 2 yrs customer has been getting ripped off without Bell doing the right thing. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-quotRogers-is-not-required-to-honour-what-an-agent-saysqu-27305900</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2012 00:17:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: &#x26;quot;Rogers is not required to honour what an agent says&#x26;qu</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-quotRogers-is-not-required-to-honour-what-an-agent-saysqu-27305888</link>
<description><![CDATA[04193189 posted : True .. yet it doesn't pay for his time lost, aggravation, damages, and rest of associated costs.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-quotRogers-is-not-required-to-honour-what-an-agent-saysqu-27305888</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2012 00:10:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: &#x26;quot;Rogers is not required to honour what an agent says&#x26;qu</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-quotRogers-is-not-required-to-honour-what-an-agent-saysqu-27298533</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1597424" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1597424');">Tx</a>:</said><p>Isn't he the same guy that was going on an on about taking TSI to court too?  I can't remember honestly but sure sounds it<br> </p></div>same whack job.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-quotRogers-is-not-required-to-honour-what-an-agent-saysqu-27298533</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2012 18:50:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: &#x26;quot;Rogers is not required to honour what an agent says&#x26;qu</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-quotRogers-is-not-required-to-honour-what-an-agent-saysqu-27298539</link>
<description><![CDATA[balur posted : It's never too late to sue... and claiming that your time is worth $10,000 over a <$100 a month service isn't ridiculous.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-quotRogers-is-not-required-to-honour-what-an-agent-saysqu-27298539</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2012 18:12:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: &#x26;quot;Rogers is not required to honour what an agent says&#x26;qu</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-quotRogers-is-not-required-to-honour-what-an-agent-saysqu-27297698</link>
<description><![CDATA[Tx posted : Isn't he the same guy that was going on an on about taking TSI to court too?  I can't remember honestly but sure sounds it]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-quotRogers-is-not-required-to-honour-what-an-agent-saysqu-27297698</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2012 12:22:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: &#x26;quot;Rogers is not required to honour what an agent says&#x26;qu</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-quotRogers-is-not-required-to-honour-what-an-agent-saysqu-27297667</link>
<description><![CDATA[JAC70 posted : Clifford is a whack job, and so is g777.  It's safe to ignore them both.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-quotRogers-is-not-required-to-honour-what-an-agent-saysqu-27297667</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2012 12:06:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: &#x26;quot;Rogers is not required to honour what an agent says&#x26;qu</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-quotRogers-is-not-required-to-honour-what-an-agent-saysqu-27297361</link>
<description><![CDATA[bt posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1835123" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1835123');">04193189</a>:</said><p>Rogers again .. LMAO<br>There's only one way for anyone to get satisfaction when such a company is that corrupt <br>... <b>Take them to court.</b><br> </p></div>What's interesting here, is that you posted that AFTER the OP got a positive resolution... without taking Rogers to court.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-quotRogers-is-not-required-to-honour-what-an-agent-saysqu-27297361</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2012 09:52:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: &#x26;quot;Rogers is not required to honour what an agent says&#x26;qu</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-quotRogers-is-not-required-to-honour-what-an-agent-saysqu-27297090</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : Wow you miss no chance to spam your silly youtube site.<br><br>Ohhh watch out for the scary forms, they are evil, use a form and they will come take your children and kick your dog.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-quotRogers-is-not-required-to-honour-what-an-agent-saysqu-27297090</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2012 06:49:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: &#x26;quot;Rogers is not required to honour what an agent says&#x26;qu</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-quotRogers-is-not-required-to-honour-what-an-agent-saysqu-27297024</link>
<description><![CDATA[04193189 posted : Rogers again .. LMAO<br>There's only one way for anyone to get satisfaction when such a company is that corrupt <br>... <b>Take them to court.</b><br><br>This is how you do it:<br>As you already have a recording and probably more ... transcribe it into an Affidavit or Notice of Understanding and Intent. Make it simple and clear .. and full in information. Sort it by date with each date tabbed in binder<br>Note: Do Not use forms provided by courts .. see Queen's Printer as to how they are formatted and to further find out why not to use them. Just ask what all the parts of a form are .. including check boxes, parts surrounded by boxes, lines, colors etc.<br><br>Make another document called Fee Schedule and send it to Attorney General.<br>Example of main content:<br>In case my inalienable rights have been violated here is my fee schedule. <br>10,000 dollars per hour<br>100,000 dollars per incident<br>1,000,000 dollars in case of injury<br>10,000,000,000 dollars in case of death paid to family or man or woman of my choosing<br>... without charge, fee or levy.<br><br>If you don't know, learn how the courts work @ &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.youtube.com/user/StrawmanRedemption" >www.youtube.com/user/StrawmanRedemption</A> ... mainly Dean Clifford playlists .. all 3 of them. Learn them inside and out, backwards and forwards ... practice with friends and also go to courts to see how it all works.<br><br>Once you know and you are confident send a Notice to Rogers with your charge/bill for your losses and remedy for situation .. by registered mail, that if they don't comply you will take them to court. Send copy of notice to court clerk as well .. also to Attorney General, if you wish.<br>Make sure your pages are numbered 1 of xx, 2 of xx .. etc.<br>It's also a good idea to put "this document is a matter of public record" for your first line on each page. <br>Give them the usual 10 days to 14 days to reply. If no reply then send 'em Notice of Default .. wait another 14 days .. then let them have it both barrels in court.<br><br>Address the owner or owners and CEO and Rogers in your documents .. so none can weasel out of it.<br>I include their wives too .. they're <b>really</b> not happy when that happens LOL<br>If other parties, such as CRTC, had their fingers in there .. name them too.<br><br>BTW: from what you write in this whole thread it is a clear deception from Rogers staff, extortion and/or fraud is being used by Rogers as well.<br><br>And whatever you do .. never ever use a lawyer .. as they are all part of the Bar Society = men's and women's  enemy number one.  Well, unless he or she signs a contract to do it your way .. and then you need to watch 'em like a hawk anyway.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-quotRogers-is-not-required-to-honour-what-an-agent-saysqu-27297024</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2012 03:55:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: &#x26;quot;Rogers is not required to honour what an agent says&#x26;qu</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-quotRogers-is-not-required-to-honour-what-an-agent-saysqu-27295978</link>
<description><![CDATA[habskilla posted : This shitty behavior is not limited to Rogers:<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.digitalhome.ca/forum/showpost.php?p=1426186&postcount=2490" >www.digitalhome.ca/forum/showpos&middot;&middot;&middot;unt=2490</A><br><small>--<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://speedtest.net/result/2032867059.png" >speedtest.net/result/2032867059.png</A></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-quotRogers-is-not-required-to-honour-what-an-agent-saysqu-27295978</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2012 18:29:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: &#x26;quot;Rogers is not required to honour what an agent says&#x26;qu</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-quotRogers-is-not-required-to-honour-what-an-agent-saysqu-27263997</link>
<description><![CDATA[resa1983 posted : If things ever reach the Ombudsman Office, they DO pull phone calls if you've gone through all the steps, even if the Office of the President won't..   They're pretty damned awesome, and unlike everyone else in the process, they care.<br><br>I should have escalated my issue past Office of the President when they did jack all for me (box just loses signal for no reason, requires reboot).  After replacing my inside cabling 3 times, replacing my box twice, and then wanting to replace my cables for a 4th time, I gave up on the morons.  I knew where the problem was, but they didn't want to listen to me or fix it.  I feel bad for the new tenant in my old apartment, as they'll be experiencing that problem now.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-quotRogers-is-not-required-to-honour-what-an-agent-saysqu-27263997</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 20:00:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: &#x26;quot;Rogers is not required to honour what an agent says&#x26;qu</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-quotRogers-is-not-required-to-honour-what-an-agent-saysqu-27263750</link>
<description><![CDATA[adam_fd posted : It's done! My sincere thanks to Teresa and everyone at the Ombudsman Office.<br><br>They took the time to understand my concern and to resolve the issue. Actually, they didn't take much time at all -- it was pretty quick.<br><br>It's been a difficult month, but I hope that my Rogers interactions go more smoothly moving forward.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-quotRogers-is-not-required-to-honour-what-an-agent-saysqu-27263750</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 18:24:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: &#x26;quot;Rogers is not required to honour what an agent says&#x26;qu</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-quotRogers-is-not-required-to-honour-what-an-agent-saysqu-27211955</link>
<description><![CDATA[sbrook posted : If the OOTP hasn't done anything, then I don't see how the SMT will ... that's like going to the store manager and then back to the department manager.<br><br>You need to escalate to the ombudsman then the CCTS or Ellen Roseman.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-quotRogers-is-not-required-to-honour-what-an-agent-saysqu-27211955</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2012 12:18:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: &#x26;quot;Rogers is not required to honour what an agent says&#x26;qu</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-quotRogers-is-not-required-to-honour-what-an-agent-saysqu-27211235</link>
<description><![CDATA[adam_fd posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1817317" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1817317');">RogersNick</a>:</said><p>Hi Adam,<br><br>Sorry about that. I haven't received any message on my end but I'd still like to offer help. I'm sending you a new IM to look into it.<br> </p></div>My bad! I mistyped the e-mail address for the Rogers Social Media Team. That explains why I haven't gotten a response yet!<br><br>(I'm still unhappy with the Office of the President, but so far the Social Meia Team is still a very promising avenue.)<br><br>Nicolas, thanks for following up here!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-quotRogers-is-not-required-to-honour-what-an-agent-saysqu-27211235</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2012 09:15:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: &#x26;quot;Rogers is not required to honour what an agent says&#x26;qu</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-quotRogers-is-not-required-to-honour-what-an-agent-saysqu-27211001</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by yyzlhr :</said><p><div class="bquote"><said>said by rogerssmoger :</said><p>All calls are recorded. most with screenshots of the agents screen. And kept 2-3 years.<br> </p></div>Rogers does record all calls but they are rarely ever used to resolve escalations.  The recordings really are there just to protect Rogers in case of litigation and are regularly used for performance management, but you'll almost never see them being used to resolve escalations.<br> </p></div>Because it's a PITA to get calls from other sites since each call centre has it's own recording systems and never want to send requested calls.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-quotRogers-is-not-required-to-honour-what-an-agent-saysqu-27211001</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2012 07:38:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: &#x26;quot;Rogers is not required to honour what an agent says&#x26;qu</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-quotRogers-is-not-required-to-honour-what-an-agent-saysqu-27210835</link>
<description><![CDATA[LondonOntGuy posted : At this point I don't even know why anyone has Robbers for anything. Everything I've read about them in the last while, it seems that it's quite the chore being a customer of theirs, but that doesn't surprise me in the least. - With Robbers, the customer IS the enemy.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-quotRogers-is-not-required-to-honour-what-an-agent-saysqu-27210835</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2012 02:17:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: &#x26;quot;Rogers is not required to honour what an agent says&#x26;qu</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-quotRogers-is-not-required-to-honour-what-an-agent-saysqu-27210563</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by rogerssmoger :</said><p>All calls are recorded. most with screenshots of the agents screen. And kept 2-3 years.<br> </p></div>Rogers does record all calls but they are rarely ever used to resolve escalations.  The recordings really are there just to protect Rogers in case of litigation and are regularly used for performance management, but you'll almost never see them being used to resolve escalations.  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-quotRogers-is-not-required-to-honour-what-an-agent-saysqu-27210563</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2012 23:28:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: &#x26;quot;Rogers is not required to honour what an agent says&#x26;qu</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-quotRogers-is-not-required-to-honour-what-an-agent-saysqu-27210352</link>
<description><![CDATA[PX Eliezer posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1726066" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1726066');">balur</a>:</said><p>In the past I've had a case where a free rental modem / router broke. Without calling support they went out and purchased a retail kit. The customer then called up demanding a refund for the cost of the modem... without properly understanding the situation the agent thought they were asking for a refund of a modem purchased through us and agreed. However were not going to eat a few hundred dollars cost of retail kit, when no troubleshooting was done on our kit, and sending a replacement free rental out would have been far cheaper.<br> </p></div>In that case, I would agree with the company 100 percent.   :)<br><br>But I think that's a very different situation.... ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-quotRogers-is-not-required-to-honour-what-an-agent-saysqu-27210352</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2012 22:01:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: &#x26;quot;Rogers is not required to honour what an agent says&#x26;qu</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-quotRogers-is-not-required-to-honour-what-an-agent-saysqu-27210332</link>
<description><![CDATA[PX Eliezer posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by rogerssmoger :</said><p>Customer Made Recordings: Can be faked and that is why they do not hold up and Rogers doesn't care to hear them.<br><br>2 people calling each other and reading a script could quite easy make a fake recording and then claim it was a real one to get things.<br><br>People have attempted to do it in the past.<br> </p></div>Fine.<br><br>Then the company can listen to its own recordings.<br><br>This isn't the 1960's when this would involve magnetic tape.  <br><br>Everything is digital, and the company certainly should be able to pull up the digital record of any calls relating to a particular account, without much trouble.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-quotRogers-is-not-required-to-honour-what-an-agent-saysqu-27210332</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2012 21:57:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: &#x26;quot;Rogers is not required to honour what an agent says&#x26;qu</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-quotRogers-is-not-required-to-honour-what-an-agent-saysqu-27210042</link>
<description><![CDATA[balur posted : PX Eliezer, your taking it to an extreme, I was only trying to present an example of call center mentality.<br><br>Of course its the company's responsibility to monitor and supervise agents but sometimes mistakes happen, and if it was blatantly stated yes we'd try to do everything we could to accommodate, but it doesn't always work out that way due to high costs involved. <br><br>In the past I've had a case where a free rental modem / router broke. Without calling support they went out and purchased a retail kit. The customer then called up demanding a refund for the cost of the modem... without properly understanding the situation the agent thought they were asking for a refund of a modem purchased through us and agreed. However were not going to eat a few hundred dollars cost of retail kit, when no troubleshooting was done on our kit, and sending a replacement free rental out would have been far cheaper.<br><br>Mistakes happen. Not saying the poster is wrong, just trying to give context regarding the call center environment.<br><br>rogerssmoger, That's a far better call recording system then I've ever gotten to use, best I've had is time estimate and then pull agent calls from that day and listen until I find the right one. Ugh painful.  I hadn't even considered that nor have I come across it (that I know of, maybe I was fooled lol), policy makes sense.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-quotRogers-is-not-required-to-honour-what-an-agent-saysqu-27210042</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2012 20:16:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: &#x26;quot;Rogers is not required to honour what an agent says&#x26;qu</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-quotRogers-is-not-required-to-honour-what-an-agent-saysqu-27209936</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : Customer Made Recordings: Can be faked and that is why they do not hold up and Rogers doesn't care to hear them.<br><br>2 people calling each other and reading a script could quite easy make a fake recording and then claim it was a real one to get things.<br>People have attempted to do it in the past.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-quotRogers-is-not-required-to-honour-what-an-agent-saysqu-27209936</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2012 19:39:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
