Reviews:
 ·Bell Sympatico
·VIF Internet
 ·Videotron
| Un chanceux avec Bell Internet Fibe 250/150...
Bell Internet Fibe 250/150 |
Il paie l'équivalent pour le Fibe 50/50 en FTTH, mais sa maison serait dans un « palier de Bell non commercialisé » ce qui aurait une grosse influence sur sa connexion qui est (selon ce qu'il a écrit) de 250/150, voyez par vous même...
Impressionnant, il est chanceux. J'aurais aimé avoir cette surprise quand que le technicien est venu m'installer mon Fibe 50/50...
On peut toujours rêver! HAHA! Ça augure bien pour un futur forfait de Bell, peut-être?  |
|
|
|
Seb851
join:2010-07-12
Sainte-Marthe-Sur-Le-Lac, QC | said by Jack_Bauer:J'ai lu sur un autre forum qu'il y a quelqu'un de Trois-Rivières qui a réussi à avoir une connexion plus haute que le Fibe traditionnel.
Il paie l'équivalent pour le Fibe 50/50 en FTTH, mais sa maison serait dans un « palier de Bell non commercialisé » ce qui aurait une grosse influence sur sa connexion qui est (selon ce qu'il a écrit) de 250/150, voyez par vous même...
Impressionnant, il est chanceux. J'aurais aimé avoir cette surprise quand que le technicien est venu m'installer mon Fibe 50/50...
On peut toujours rêver! HAHA! Ça augure bien pour un futur forfait de Bell, peut-être?
J'espere que bell va offrir le 50 sur le VDSL 2 ... |
|
 MarshalPremium
join:2003-11-01
Montreal | reply to Jack_Bauer
Quand on m'a installe, jai eu 295/200 pendant environ 1 semaine avant que le robot passe et que j'aie mon vrai profil..
donc, faut pas trop esperer!
--
Rogers - iPhone 4s 32gb |
|
 MartinPremium
join:2005-05-05
@bell.ca
kudos:2 | reply to Jack_Bauer
Exact! Les profiles sont mis à jour dans les jours qui suivent l'installation et il va avoir la vitesse pour laquelle il paie. |
|
| D'accord! |
|
| reply to Jack_Bauer
c'est quoi les futur profil qui existe, mais que bell n'ont pas encore mit pour le publique ? question de bien rever ce soir. |
|
MartinPremium
join:2005-05-05
@bell.ca
kudos:2 | reply to Jack_Bauer
Fibe300 |
|
 HiVoltPremium
join:2000-12-28
Toronto, ON
kudos:17 | reply to Jack_Bauer
What's the cap? 75GB? LOL. |
|
| said by HiVolt:What's the cap? 75GB? LOL. 300GB, $200/month. |
|
| reply to Jack_Bauer
Why isn't it symmetrical? should be 250/250.... They really should put a 1000/1000 10TB package out. These others are like fake epeen. |
|
| said by BliZZardX:Why isn't it symmetrical? should be 250/250.... Bell is doing GPON, the fiber feed itself is asymmetrical: 2.488Gbps down, 1.244Gbps up. |
|
HiVoltPremium
join:2000-12-28
Toronto, ON
kudos:17 Reviews:
·TekSavvy Cable
·TekSavvy DSL
| reply to InvalidError
Hahah @ both the price & cap.
You can sneeze and the cap be blown at those speeds...
--
GO BLUE JAYS!
|
|
 TigerLordResident pentaxianPremium,Mod
join:2002-06-09
Canada
kudos:6
·ELECTRONICBOX
Host:
International Broa..
Videotron
| said by HiVolt:You can sneeze and the cap be blown at those speeds...
Or rub a quicky in HD |
|
Reviews:
 ·WIND Mobile
·Bell Sympatico
| reply to InvalidError
said by InvalidError:said by BliZZardX:Why isn't it symmetrical? should be 250/250.... Bell is doing GPON, the fiber feed itself is asymmetrical: 2.488Gbps down, 1.244Gbps up. That would be a good explanation if they had 2500/1280 instead of 2500/2500.. but they're using 10% of that. 250/250 500/500 1000/100 are no less possible than 175/175.
--
Fiber Optics are the future of high-speed internet access. Stop by the BBR »Fiber Optic Forum. |
|
| said by BliZZardX:That would be a good explanation if they had 2500/1280 instead of 2500/2500.. but they're using 10% of that. 250/250 500/500 1000/100 are no less possible than 175/175. You also have to keep in mind that GPON is split 8/16/32-ways between subscribers. There is 64b66b encoding, DOCSIS-style framing and other overheads that reduce actual usable bandwidth as well.
So 300/150 would be about as high as it can go without having to worry about potentially having to shuffle subscribers at the fiber JWI to balance load between feed fibers/ports should such high-speed service ever become popular.
Right now though, even FiOS speed junkies are asking themselves why they bothered upgrading to 300Mbps since nearly no internet servers can feed data anywhere near that fast and almost no internet-based service yield any benefit from it either. |
|
Reviews:
·WIND Mobile
·Bell Sympatico
1 edit | That's not completely true -- the best experience will come from high throughput geolocal/low latency links. Good CDNs support 10Gbit per client. If you are a biz more and more hosts are offering 10Gbit ports for dedicated/colocation. OVH are selling 10Gbit dedicated servers for C$284/month. |
|
| said by BliZZardX:If you are a biz more and more hosts are offering 10Gbit ports for dedicated/colocation. OVH are selling 10Gbit dedicated servers for C$284/month. Having a 10Gbps connection and actually being able to deliver data that fast are two completely different stories.
You can have a 10Gbps connection but this is not going to help you if you are feeding data to 1000 concurrent users off a storage array that can only sustain 5Gbps. Only clients who request cached data will be able to burst at 100+Mbps, the rest get ~5Mbps. |
|
| At least its up to the end user to decide, if you need more speed you can just build more arrays |
|
kovy
join:2009-03-26
kudos:8 | reply to InvalidError
said by InvalidError:said by BliZZardX:Why isn't it symmetrical? should be 250/250.... Bell is doing GPON, the fiber feed itself is asymmetrical: 2.488Gbps down, 1.244Gbps up. Yeah but upload is a lot less utilized then download. |
|
