<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Why not do this instead?&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Why-not-do-this-instead-27347465</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 14:18:36 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 14:18:36 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Why not do this instead?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Why-not-do-this-instead-27348277</link>
<description><![CDATA[mackey posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1430224" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1430224');">AZ_OGM</a>:</said><p>I agree, if they can use "suburban camouflage" to hide cell phone towers, why not VRADS? </p></div>For starters, that "suburban camouflage" is either mandated by the government (local or state law) or agreed to as a condition to put up the tower; the companies don't do it because they <i>want</i> to.<br><br>Besides, it's free advertising when people start asking why those big honkin' boxes are getting planted all over the place.<br><br>/M]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Why-not-do-this-instead-27348277</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 13:17:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Why not do this instead?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Why-not-do-this-instead-27347847</link>
<description><![CDATA[AZ_OGM posted : I agree, if they can use "suburban camouflage" to hide cell phone towers, why not VRADS?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Why-not-do-this-instead-27347847</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 11:19:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Why not do this instead?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Why-not-do-this-instead-27347683</link>
<description><![CDATA[sam64 posted : Pretty neat!<br>They should be able to do something with the stationary cabinets but then you would have to deal with all the lawsuits stemming from the idiots who run into them because they were so "invisible".<br><br>There is no easy solution. I have seen it countless number of times when people complain about poor cell signals but will fight tooth and nail to the new tower that is being put up in their community. There has to be some give and take.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Why-not-do-this-instead-27347683</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 10:38:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Why not do this instead?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Why-not-do-this-instead-27347465</link>
<description><![CDATA[mob posted : &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.wimp.com/invisiblemercedes/" >www.wimp.com/invisiblemercedes/</A><br><br>If they can do it on a moving car, I'm pretty sure they could do it on a stationary box.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Why-not-do-this-instead-27347465</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 09:38:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
