<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Interesting&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Interesting-27360466</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 07:41:23 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 07:41:23 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Interesting</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Interesting-27360466</link>
<description><![CDATA[PapaMidnight posted : With the exception of those who wish to subject themselves to the horror of attempting to browse a website on an e-ink device, and those who have been (ab)using their Kindle's (and violating the EULA and TOS) for effectively free 3g tethering, I can't imagine who this might negatively affect.<br><br>That said, while I think 50MB is somewhat laughable, It was a service created with the intention of allowing users to download e-books. I'm guessing the e-ink compatible ones don't really go that high in size (maybe one megabyte max?). I'm also guessing that this cap only affects general browsing (as it says it doesn't affect the amazon website, wikipedia, or the kindle store), and doesn't limit the amount a user is able to download on a 3G connection.<br><br>So, considering the application, I'm oddly okay with this.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Interesting-27360466</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 19:23:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
