<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Reality, again!&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Reality-again-27362574</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 12:52:35 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 12:52:35 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Reality, again!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Reality-again-27376979</link>
<description><![CDATA[elray posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1176791" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1176791');">buddahbless</a>:</said><p>Rural customers are not more fickle just more cautious on how they spend there cash.. If you gave rural customers the option of comcast at $40 per month for 3-6 mbps HSI @ or ATT DSL 1.5-3.0 mbps for $15 they would chose the ATT DSL and be happy with it, with not even a care in the world that there are pricier options for 20-100 mbps. A lot of people seem to forget there only option in rural areas is dial up for $9.95 + per month. Why would anyone pay $10 for 56k dial up if for just a few bucks more they could get at least DSL speeds.<br><br>Really what would you chose if you at least had the option but were on a budget. <br> </p></div>Fickle, cautious, frugal, conservative - you can call it what you like, the fact is simple, rural customers are less willing to part with their hard-earned dollars for broadband, at any speed.<br><br>Urban DSL isn't $15.  You have to buy dialtone, which takes even a $15 teaser rate to about $40, typically $50-60.   Basic DSL rates run $25-40 before fees.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Reality-again-27376979</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2012 12:27:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Reality, again!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Reality-again-27362885</link>
<description><![CDATA[buddahbless posted : Rural customers are not more fickle just more cautious on how they spend there cash.. If you gave rural customers the option of comcast at $40 per month for 3-6 mbps HSI @ or ATT DSL 1.5-3.0 mbps for $15 they would chose the ATT DSL and be happy with it, with not even a care in the world that there are pricier options for 20-100 mbps. A lot of people seem to forget there only option in rural areas is dial up for $9.95 + per month. Why would anyone pay $10 for 56k dial up if for just a few bucks more they could get at least DSL speeds.<br><br>Really what would you chose if you at least had the option but were on a budget. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Reality-again-27362885</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 14:36:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Reality, again!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Reality-again-27362574</link>
<description><![CDATA[elray posted : The carriers are refusing the subsidy, because they know they'll still lose money.<br><br>Verizon can't get more than 1/3rd of their customers to buy Fios; Rural customers are more fickle - simply not interested in buying broadband at even urban market rates.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Reality-again-27362574</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 13:23:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
