| reply to thecybernerd
Re: IDIOT Also, most services have very low uplink speed or charge a lot for more uplink. There will be a lot of future apps that take advantage of faster uplink. |
|
|
|
| said by xenophon:Also, most services have very low uplink speed or charge a lot for more uplink. There will be a lot of future apps that take advantage of faster uplink.
big time, I think we may even soon see a web os (litterly on the cloud idea) in such a idea the upload is needed to speed up to 20-40mbps to really use it..
storage is getting cheap and companies are competing on the cloud storage areas I would not be surprised if we don't see some one come along and beat Google 1tb.. that being said we need more speed |
|
| Many users already have a need for that kind of upload.
Lets not forget what small to mid-size business needs. |
|
| Google is not targeting small/medium biz but I imagine after a year of eval, if they decide to stay in ISP biz, they'll allow SMBs. They've given some indication it's a future thing. |
|
Reviews:
 ·T-Mobile US
·Sprint Mobile Br..
| reply to Cobra11M
said by Cobra11M:said by xenophon:Also, most services have very low uplink speed or charge a lot for more uplink. There will be a lot of future apps that take advantage of faster uplink.
big time, I think we may even soon see a web os (litterly on the cloud idea) in such a idea the upload is needed to speed up to 20-40mbps to really use it.. Something like Chrome OS maybe?
--
|
|
| said by bobjohnson:said by Cobra11M:said by xenophon:Also, most services have very low uplink speed or charge a lot for more uplink. There will be a lot of future apps that take advantage of faster uplink.
big time, I think we may even soon see a web os (litterly on the cloud idea) in such a idea the upload is needed to speed up to 20-40mbps to really use it.. Something like Chrome OS maybe? yup forgot about that haha |
|
