<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Re: Surge Protection Residential Whole House&#x27; in forum &#x27;Home Improvement&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27394482</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 18:56:48 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 18:56:48 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Surge Protection Residential Whole House</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27418993</link>
<description><![CDATA[49528867 posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1340949" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1340949');">SmokChsr</a>:</said><p>I'm a Florida boy, What's a rock??<br> </p></div>A rock is what you bruise your foot with when younger by steeping on and when older by dropping them. ;-)<br><br>Though as another Florida boy I must admit excepting the female form, everything else down here is flat as a pancake.<br><br>Wayne<br><small>--<br>Madness takes its toll, please have exact change ready&#133;</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27418993</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2012 20:26:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Surge Protection Residential Whole House</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27418924</link>
<description><![CDATA[SmokChsr posted : I don't know about the costs, but there is also "conductive" concrete that is often poured in trenches to create a ground in rock. They use this mostly on mountain tops where it's solid rock. They say it's pretty darn good, though I've never had any experience with it myself. I'm a Florida boy, What's a rock??]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27418924</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2012 20:01:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Surge Protection Residential Whole House</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27418271</link>
<description><![CDATA[laserfan posted : Bare conductor...more GEM...hmm, that makes too much sense! Thanks!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27418271</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2012 14:58:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Surge Protection Residential Whole House</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27417778</link>
<description><![CDATA[49528867 posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1140301" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1140301');">laserfan</a>:</said><p>Just a shallow trench. </p></div>Then drop a bare conductor in there and backfill it with some GEM and there's your ground for the sub building.<br><br>Wayne<br><small>--<br>Madness takes its toll, please have exact change ready…</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27417778</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2012 10:56:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Surge Protection Residential Whole House</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27417755</link>
<description><![CDATA[laserfan posted : Just a shallow trench.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27417755</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2012 10:48:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Surge Protection Residential Whole House</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27417654</link>
<description><![CDATA[49528867 posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1140301" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1140301');">laserfan</a>:</said><p>I guess I should rent the Bobcat and plant a rod w/GEM as close as I can get it, then couple to the building service with #6 or bigger. </p></div>Do you plan to bond the sub buildings ground to the pole ground?<br><br>If so how are you going to get the wire from the sub building to the pole?<br><br>Wayne <br><small>--<br>Madness takes its toll, please have exact change ready…</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27417654</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2012 09:51:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Surge Protection Residential Whole House</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27417614</link>
<description><![CDATA[laserfan posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/205331" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=205331');">robbin</a>:</said><p>You can't drill a hole for a ground rod. They must be driven. The reason I went with GEM in a hole as opposed to a trench is than in summer the limestone dries out. I wanted to try to get contact with an area which may retain some moisture. The Bobcat was able to drill a 6" hole. Most everything and everyone else could only drill minimum of 9".</p></div>No doubt your point is: if you drill a hole thru solid rock you aren't going to get any grounding benefit. I was hoping for SOME grounding benefit in that the rock here is a mix of granite and caliche.<br><br>But it might be a whole lot of trouble for a very-little-or-no benefit so thanks for turning me off to drilling.<br><br>I guess I should rent the Bobcat and plant a rod w/GEM as close as I can get it, then couple to the building service with #6 or bigger.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27417614</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2012 09:32:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Surge Protection Residential Whole House</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27417500</link>
<description><![CDATA[49528867 posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1340949" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1340949');">SmokChsr</a>:</said><p>Close, but not exactly what it said. The rods of the single system can't be less than 6' apart, preferably they should be 8'-12' apart. You had stated earlier that the inspector made you space them 5' apart, which didn't meet code.</p></div>250.56 Resistance of Rod, Pipe, and Plate Electrodes.<br>A single electrode consisting of a rod, pipe, or plate that does not have a resistance to ground of 25 ohms or less shall be augmented by one additional electrode of any of the types specified by 250.52(A)(2) through (A)(7). <b>Where multiple rod, pipe, or plate electrodes are installed to meet the requirements of this section, they shall not be less than 1.8 m (6 ft) apart.</b><br><br>When it comes to misinterpreting the code some AHJ&#146;s are the best<br><br>Wayne<br><small>--<br>Madness takes its toll, please have exact change ready&#133;</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27417500</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2012 06:55:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Surge Protection Residential Whole House</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27417488</link>
<description><![CDATA[SmokChsr posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1506715" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1506715');">Jack_in_VA</a>:</said><p>Given the two ground rods are bonded together with #6 solid copper wire it is considered a single grounding electrode system. That single system can't be less than 6 ft from another system.<br> </p></div>Close, but not exactly what it said. The rods of the single system can't be less than 6' apart, preferably they should be 8'-12' apart.<br>You had stated earlier that the inspector made you space them 5' apart, which didn't meet code. The primary reason the rods should be spaced is that if they are too close together the additional rod is not effective because it is trying to conduct into the same earth as the first rod. Or said another way, if the rods are too close together you wasted time and money driving the second rod, and it's not much more effective than a single rod. <br><br>Forget a second system, since you should NEVER have a second system at any one structure. As for the detached building, it likely doesn't need a rod of it's own, but as long as it was bonded by a #6 back to the house system, it is a part of that one system and should meet code. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27417488</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2012 06:33:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Surge Protection Residential Whole House</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27417480</link>
<description><![CDATA[SmokChsr posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1466375" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1466375');">alkizmo</a>:</said><p>Ties everything together? You mean the multiple ground electrodes? <br>Or are you saying to ground anything that's conductive attached to the house, such as roof antenna, attic venting hoods, drain stacks and so on, to a #6 that goes to your ground rod?<br> </p></div>It can be one or more ground electrodes, but they must all be bonded together outside.  <br><br>Yes, I am saying anything conductive entering or attached to the structure should be bonded to the ground system. For an antenna mast, I would definitely want to home run it to the ground system. On the other roof items you have to use a judgement. While the best practice would be to bond everything, sometimes it's just not practical, especially in a residential setting. If you have an antenna mast it will tend to protect most other roof items in the area. <br><br>Case in point, I recently went to a $1mil+ house that burnt down after lightning struck the metal chimney cover, traveled down the flu pipe and arched over to the propane line. The arch caused a hole in the line and ignited the escaping propane. In this case it's very easy to see the lightning path from the chimney to the buried propane tank which was a very nice ground.  There was a code violation that the propane line should have been bonded to the fireplace. <div class="borderless"><TABLE WIDTH=95% align=center border=0 CELLPADDING=4"><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/27417480?c=2024904&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IyNzM5NDgzNy54bWw%3D"><IMG class="apic" BORDER=0 TITLE="554201 bytes" WIDTH=600 HEIGHT=337 SRC="/r0/download/2024904.thumb600~5dcaa14fc3f94138cec8ba7b677660f7/DSC04827.JPG/thumb.jpg" ALT="Click for full size"></A><br>The right Chimney was struck</TD></TR><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/27417480?c=2024905&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IyNzM5NDgzNy54bWw%3D"><IMG class="apic" BORDER=0 TITLE="526920 bytes" WIDTH=600 HEIGHT=337 SRC="/r0/download/2024905.thumb600~2547e0c20cc8fe69856ecb7106541cf2/DSC04843.JPG/thumb.jpg" ALT="Click for full size"></A><br>Off to the races..</TD></TABLE></div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27417480</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2012 06:16:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Surge Protection Residential Whole House</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27417469</link>
<description><![CDATA[SmokChsr posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1723898" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1723898');">49528867</a>:</said><p>http://www.rwonline.com/article/no-soldering-iron-these-xlrs-crimp-on/24805<br></p></div> :o Eeeks!!! that's in Radio World!! Why would anyone want to write for a rag like that?  ;)  theBDR.net is where all the good writers hangout  :D ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27417469</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2012 05:39:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SPD</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-SPD-27417081</link>
<description><![CDATA[garys_2k posted : I'd guess that the coils would need to be spread apart a bit to prevent flash-over from the incoming wires to those leaving for the house. Probably would be good to provide a low impedance arc path to ground in that enclosure, too.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-SPD-27417081</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2012 22:43:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SPD</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-SPD-27416863</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1140301" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1140301');">laserfan</a>:</said><p><div class="bquote"><said>said by disconnected :</said><p>One thing often overlooked in the art of protecting against lightning on the mains drop is the fact that it is a high frequency event. The use of inductors to absorb the brunt of the energy, rather than simply trying to shunt 40,000 amperes to ground, is the route I chose in the 1960s. Historically, every summer, our neighbors complain of losing TVs, well pump motors and lights during electrical storms. In 46 years of living at this address, we have had zero problems with these lightning strikes to our branch, while the neighbors are replacing their electronic every summer. The difference is likely the loop of wire, coiled up before it comes into the service panel.</p></div>If you already said, I missed it: what does this "coiled-up loop of wire" in advance of the Service Panel look like? Can it be retrofitted into a site?<br><br>I completely buy the "high frequency event" statement. At least, an acquaintance of mine, along with having many things in his house fry, did also suffer major electrical damage to his truck with an indirect lightning strike.<br><br>As for the "single point ground", the way we are set-up this is really difficult to achieve as our pole and house and garage are 175, 200, and 150 feet apart from one another. We do have a swimming pool, with of course lots of in-ground rebar, and are grounded to *it*--I dunno but maybe this has helped (we've had lots of lightning in 9 years here but no damage to other than trees).<br> </p></div>It looks like a coil, or a loop of wire. The size varies with the installation. One member here has a NEMA box with heavy guage wire coils in it, ahead of his panel. Mine's a coil about 4' diameter, and four turns. A neat installation could implement a large metal enclosure for the coil and mounted on a pedestal outside the residence.<br><br>Looking at lightning on a spectrum analyzer, one sees the whole baseline noise level jump about 30dB for distant lightning. It's easy to see how a local strike could be well over 100dB rise in voltage across the 1GHz spectrum.<br><br>For multiple buildings you might have them all tap a central earth ground nearest the center of the complex. Copper strapping, buried in concrete, is effective over moderate distances. Use of ordinary wire like Home Depot sells as "ground wire" is ineffective for anything more than static drainoff with a nearby strike. Heavy, and wide, copper strapping has an effectively low impedance at these higher frequencies. It's what we use at broadcast tower sites as ground and towers get hit several times a summer.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-SPD-27416863</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2012 21:47:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Surge Protection Residential Whole House</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27416708</link>
<description><![CDATA[robbin posted : You can't drill a hole for a ground rod. They must be driven. The reason I went with GEM in a hole as opposed to a trench is than in summer the limestone dries out. I wanted to try to get contact with an area which may retain some moisture. The Bobcat was able to drill a 6" hole. Most everything and everyone else could only drill minimum of 9".]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27416708</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2012 19:34:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Surge Protection Residential Whole House</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27416662</link>
<description><![CDATA[laserfan posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/205331" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=205331');">robbin</a>:</said><p>Used a rock drill mounted on a Bobcat Excavator to drill 6" holes 8 foot deep and installed traditional ground rods in the bored holes using the GEM product. You could also use a rock saw to cut a trench.</p></div>Ah yes, it seems in Texas a real man needs either a skid-steer or a backhoe. I'd love both but have only a lowly Tractor. I've used a little Dingo trencher (nice for laying low voltage wire) but not one of the big rock saws--our contractor broke one laying our main house conduit. Took 3 days continuous to get thru one ~35ft leg of the trench.<br><br>Anyway I like the Bobcat idea but it would be hard getting it close to where I need to put my rods. Still toying with making some sort of steel extension for use with a large masonry bit and my 1" hammer drill. Oughta be able to weld something that would work. Maybe I will just ask our rental guys about this.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27416662</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2012 19:09:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Surge Protection Residential Whole House</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27416638</link>
<description><![CDATA[robbin posted : I don't think GEM has bentonite in It. It hardens (sets up firmly according to Erico) much like cement does. It doesn't loose conductivity when it dries. When I researched it years ago, it seemed that they had done something other than adding graphite to bentonite. The GEM performance seemed to indicate that they had taken a different path.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27416638</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2012 18:49:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Surge Protection Residential Whole House</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27416611</link>
<description><![CDATA[49528867 posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/205331" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=205331');">robbin</a>:</said><p>I've used Erico GEM before. It's very interesting stuff. Seems like black tile grout with a lot of carbon (graphite) in it. </p></div>Well consider this, Eirco builds Cadweld molds out of graphite so I am sure they have a silo or two of it on hand, then take that graphite powder and mix it with oh say some bentonite, add a touch of a chemical to lower ground resistance that will not attack copper or steel and meets the EPA leeching requirements, mix well and you have GEM.<br><br>And yes it is nasty to work with, I haven&#146;t used GEM but have worked with a similar product sold by Harger.<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.harger.com/" >www.harger.com/</A><br><br>Wayne<br><small>--<br>Madness takes its toll, please have exact change ready&#133;</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27416611</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2012 18:38:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Surge Protection Residential Whole House</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27416144</link>
<description><![CDATA[robbin posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1140301" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1140301');">laserfan</a>:</said><p><div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1723898" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1723898');">49528867</a>:</said><p>If you cannot go down you might be able to trench horizontally (below the frost line if applicable) and achieve the same results by laying a bare conductor in the trench if you are limited in the length of you trench you can add a product before backfilling such as Erico GEM to enhance your grounds effectiveness.<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.erico.com/products/GEM.asp" >www.erico.com/products/GEM.asp</A></p></div>Now there is something I've never seen (nor heard of) before! Can't imagine we can get it from our local HD/Lowes though! :D<br><br>Or maybe we can--the local HD does have very-large-sheets of copper w/ground connection for this very purpose. Pricey as heck of course.<br> </p></div>I've used Erico GEM before. It's very interesting stuff. Seems like black tile grout with a lot of carbon (graphite) in it. I'm sure that's not how they make it, but that is what it seemed like. Very messy, stains your hands black, dries hard. I added extra ground rods to my system using it. Used a rock drill mounted on a Bobcat Excavator to drill 6" holes 8 foot deep and installed traditional ground rods in the bored holes using the GEM product. You could also use a rock saw to cut a trench. Best place to get Erico products in my area is Graybar. They do not stock GEM in Texas last I checked, but they do keep it in one of their warehouses somewhere up north. As I recall, the GEM product and shipping came to about $125 per hole (10 years ago).]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27416144</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2012 14:34:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Surge Protection Residential Whole House</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27416131</link>
<description><![CDATA[garys_2k posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1140301" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1140301');">laserfan</a>:</said><p>Ok after reading all this stuff, and finding also <A HREF="http://www.esgroundingsolutions.com/about-electrical-grounding/what-are-some-different-types-of-grounding-electrodes.php" >this page on ground methods</A> I am officially too smart for my own good.<br><br>The link says conventional ground rods suck, and even if I *was* able to somehow dig a 30" hole for a ground plate, it'd work poorly and last about a week.<br><br>;)<br><br>This has been fun though. Maybe I'll play amateur chemist and build-my-own electrolytic...<br><br>:p<br> </p></div>I suspect calcium chloride may be a good salt to use -- it's definitely a desiccant and would draw moisture from the atmosphere.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27416131</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2012 14:31:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Surge Protection Residential Whole House</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27415943</link>
<description><![CDATA[Jack_in_VA posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1140301" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1140301');">laserfan</a>:</said><p>Ok after reading all this stuff, and finding also <A HREF="http://www.esgroundingsolutions.com/about-electrical-grounding/what-are-some-different-types-of-grounding-electrodes.php" >this page on ground methods</A> I am officially too smart for my own good.<br><br>The link says conventional ground rods suck, and even if I *was* able to somehow dig a 30" hole for a ground plate, it'd work poorly and last about a week.<br><br>;)<br><br>This has been fun though. Maybe I'll play amateur chemist and build-my-own electrolytic...<br><br>:p<br> </p></div>It does show that there is way more considerations to effective grounding than many people realize. I especially liked finding an article on Touch Voltage. I had that in a seminar a long time ago. <br><br>You have rocks but Sandy soil is also a challenge but thankfully here I'm on the water and the water table is high enough for the ground rod to contact.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27415943</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2012 13:07:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Surge Protection Residential Whole House</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27415898</link>
<description><![CDATA[laserfan posted : Ok after reading all this stuff, and finding also <A HREF="http://www.esgroundingsolutions.com/about-electrical-grounding/what-are-some-different-types-of-grounding-electrodes.php" >this page on ground methods</A> I am officially too smart for my own good.<br><br>The link says conventional ground rods suck, and even if I *was* able to somehow dig a 30" hole for a ground plate, it'd work poorly and last about a week.<br><br>;)<br><br>This has been fun though. Maybe I'll play amateur chemist and build-my-own electrolytic...<br><br>:p]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27415898</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2012 12:49:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Surge Protection Residential Whole House</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27415841</link>
<description><![CDATA[49528867 posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1506715" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1506715');">Jack_in_VA</a>:</said><p>http://ecmweb.com/content/achieving-acceptable-ground-poor-soil<br></p></div>In that article did you happen to catch this?<br><br>Always install multiple electrodes so they are more than 6 ft apart. ;-)<br><br>Wayne<br><small>--<br>Madness takes its toll, please have exact change ready&#133;</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27415841</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2012 12:25:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Surge Protection Residential Whole House</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27415775</link>
<description><![CDATA[Jack_in_VA posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1140301" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1140301');">laserfan</a>:</said><p><div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1723898" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1723898');">49528867</a>:</said><p>If you cannot go down you might be able to trench horizontally (below the frost line if applicable) and achieve the same results by laying a bare conductor in the trench if you are limited in the length of you trench you can add a product before backfilling such as Erico GEM to enhance your grounds effectiveness.<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.erico.com/products/GEM.asp" >www.erico.com/products/GEM.asp</A></p></div>Now there is something I've never seen (nor heard of) before! Can't imagine we can get it from our local HD/Lowes though! :D<br><br>Or maybe we can--the local HD does have very-large-sheets of copper w/ground connection for this very purpose. Pricey as heck of course.<br> </p></div>Ground Plate - An electrode made to the requirements of NEC article 250-52 (d).  The material used shall be a copper alloy intended for the purpose with a minimum thickness of 0.060&#148;.  Each plate shall expose a minimum of 5 ft2 of surface area to contact the soil. Grounding conductors shall be attached to the plate using a welding process. Splices made to the grounding conductor shall be made using a welding process.  Dissimilar metals and solder connections shall not be allowed.  Usually installed in a horizontal position.<br><br><a href="http://ecmweb.com/content/achieving-acceptable-ground-poor-soil">Achieving an Acceptable Ground in Poor Soil-EC&M Article</a><br><br><a href="http://ecmweb.com/site-files/ecmweb.com/files/archive/ecmweb.com/images/archive/0501btb.pdf">Ground Rods and Touch Voltages</a><br><br>Ground rods are not enough to protect from lethal voltages.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27415775</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2012 11:59:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Surge Protection Residential Whole House</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27415688</link>
<description><![CDATA[laserfan posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1723898" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1723898');">49528867</a>:</said><p>If you cannot go down you might be able to trench horizontally (below the frost line if applicable) and achieve the same results by laying a bare conductor in the trench if you are limited in the length of you trench you can add a product before backfilling such as Erico GEM to enhance your grounds effectiveness.<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.erico.com/products/GEM.asp" >www.erico.com/products/GEM.asp</A></p></div>Now there is something I've never seen (nor heard of) before! Can't imagine we can get it from our local HD/Lowes though! :D<br><br>Or maybe we can--the local HD does have very-large-sheets of copper w/ground connection for this very purpose. Pricey as heck of course.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27415688</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2012 11:23:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Surge Protection Residential Whole House</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27415392</link>
<description><![CDATA[Jack_in_VA posted : OP I found some good equipment for lightning and surge protection. I don't think a single device will cover everything that needs protection effectively. <br><br><a href="http://www.lightningprotectioncor.com/">Lightning & Surge Protective Devices</a>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27415392</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2012 08:59:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Surge Protection Residential Whole House</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27415353</link>
<description><![CDATA[49528867 posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1506715" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1506715');">Jack_in_VA</a>:</said><p>Given the two ground rods are bonded together with #6 solid copper wire it is considered a single grounding electrode system. That single system can't be less than 6 ft from another system. </p></div>Incorrect. <br><br>250.56 Resistance of Rod, Pipe, and Plate Electrodes.<br>A single electrode consisting of a rod, pipe, or plate that does not have a resistance to ground of 25 ohms or less shall be augmented by one additional electrode of any of the types specified by 250.52(A)(2) through (A)(7). Where multiple rod, pipe, or plate electrodes are installed to meet the requirements of this section, they shall not be less than 1.8 m (6 ft) apart.<br><br>Note. <br>Where multiple rod, pipe, or plate electrodes are installed to meet the requirements of this section, they shall not be less than 1.8 m (6 ft) apart.<br><br>In the code "shall not means something."<br><br>Wayne<br><small>--<br>Madness takes its toll, please have exact change ready…</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27415353</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2012 08:37:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Surge Protection Residential Whole House</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27415343</link>
<description><![CDATA[49528867 posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1506715" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1506715');">Jack_in_VA</a>:</said><p> It blew up most of the glass tube spark gap enclosures the telco had on their incoming circuits. They spent a lot of time repairing/replacing them and getting our phone system back up. </p></div>That&#146;s old school, protectors used nowadays are hybrids providing gas tubes for the primary protection, backed by MOV for through thru protection and solid state protection facing the CPE.<br><br>Wayne<br><small>--<br>Madness takes its toll, please have exact change ready…</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27415343</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2012 08:30:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Surge Protection Residential Whole House</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27415340</link>
<description><![CDATA[Jack_in_VA posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1340949" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1340949');">SmokChsr</a>:</said><p><div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1506715" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1506715');">Jack_in_VA</a>:</said><p>You have to know Wayne in spite of  what you think, say or write your opinions mean nothing except to you. The inspector is the only one who matters and if he says to do something do it. <br> </p></div>Until he leaves, then do it right. <br>If you read the NEC, (not something I do very often) you'll see for a fact that the inspector is WRONG! That leaves the question, are you going to do a proper job or just make the inspector happy at the cost of lost equipment, and dangerous conditions? <br><br> <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>quote:</SMALL><HR>250.53(B) Electrode Spacing. Where more than one of the electrodes of the type specified in 250.52(A)(5) or (A)(7) are used, <u>each electrode of one grounding system</u> (including that used for air terminals) shall not be less than 1.83 m (6 ft) from any other electrode of another grounding system. <B>Two or more grounding electrodes that are bonded together shall be considered a single grounding electrode system</B>."<HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br> </p></div>Given the two ground rods are bonded together with #6 solid copper wire it is considered a single grounding electrode system. That single system can't be less than 6 ft from another system.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27415340</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2012 08:30:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Surge Protection Residential Whole House</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27415336</link>
<description><![CDATA[49528867 posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1140301" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1140301');">laserfan</a>:</said><p>Regarding my "single ground at pole, not at house or garage, but another at pool" I can only add that driving ground rods around here is next-to-impossible given the rock we live on. </p></div>You have a few options, depending on the thickness of the rocky layer if you can drill through the rock and get to the soil underneath you can buy ground rods which connect to each other to extend the length allowing you to get a decent amount of rod into the soil.<br><br>If you cannot go down you might be able to trench horizontally (below the frost line if applicable) and achieve the same results by laying a bare conductor in the trench if you are limited in the length of you trench you can add a product before backfilling such as Erico GEM to enhance your grounds effectiveness.<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.erico.com/products/GEM.asp" >www.erico.com/products/GEM.asp</A><br><br>Wayne<br><small>--<br>Madness takes its toll, please have exact change ready…</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27415336</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2012 08:26:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Surge Protection Residential Whole House</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27415325</link>
<description><![CDATA[49528867 posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1506715" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1506715');">Jack_in_VA</a>:</said><p>Not needed. Installation is exactly what the inspector required. </p></div>But your additional ground rod is not in compliance with the code nor is it installed in an effective manner, you see there is something known as soil resistance and placing ground rods too close together negates the effectiveness of the additional rods due to that resistance.<br><br>[att=1]<br><br>Wayne <br><small>--<br>Madness takes its toll, please have exact change ready…</small><div class="borderless"><TABLE WIDTH=95% align=center border=0 CELLPADDING=4"><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/27415325?c=2024718&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IyNzM5NDgzNy54bWw%3D"><IMG TITLE="23932 bytes" BORDER=0 WIDTH=585 HEIGHT=369 SRC="/r0/download/2024718~c38f83a241469a22239ffdd58b6cb58a/groundresistance.jpg"></A></TD></TABLE></div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27415325</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2012 08:18:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Surge Protection Residential Whole House</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27415318</link>
<description><![CDATA[laserfan posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1723898" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1723898');">49528867</a>:</said><p><div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/269768" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=269768');">nunya</a>:</said><p>I drive a rod on every pool with a sub-panel. As long as it is bonded back to the main with a #6 or greater, it's perfectly compliant. It's not required, but it's not a violation. </p></div>Yes and even though it is not required, by doing so you are providing your customer with a considerably safer electrical system.</p></div>Great, that makes me feel better, thanks.<br><br>Regarding my "single ground at pole, not at house or garage, but another at pool" I can only add that driving ground rods around here is next-to-impossible given the rock we live on.<br><br>I don't know how well a ground rod can work in (almost) solid rock, but I can't imagine it's good.<br><br>At least we don't have to worry about shifting foundations, but for everything else the rock here (I don't even want to call it "rocky soil" cuz there ain't much soil!) is a huge PIA.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27415318</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2012 08:13:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Surge Protection Residential Whole House</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27415315</link>
<description><![CDATA[Jack_in_VA posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/871781" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=871781');">nonymous</a>:</said><p><div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1506715" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1506715');">Jack_in_VA</a>:</said><p>Really? IMO I hardly think that someone who specializes in communications is fully qualified across the spectrum of industrial and residential grounding. That would be a truly a unique individual. That especially is true when your statements conflict with what some of us know and see practiced in the field and required in many areas.<br><br> </p></div>What was the old bell system five nines up time. Grounding did have tons to do with that. You have circuits all the way from a CO out many, many miles into the field. Without proper grounding besides up time the noise would be canceling any signal. <br>Bell Labs did know grounding. <br> </p></div>You should come here for an example of the perfect noise cancelling grounding. Mine was so bad and the Verizon techs unable to correct it I just gave up and went with Verizon Wireless Home Connect. Works fine and $30/mo cheaper.<br><br>Yes the old Bell System was fine when they had excellent trained knowledgeable employees. Now for the most part they have a bunch of high paid, union protected don't care workers. I had an uncle that worked for Bell Atlantic all his life and he would roll over in his grave if he saw the quality of workers now.<br><br>Kind of funny though lightning struck one of our power plant stacks one night. The only thing effected in the whole plant including generators was the phone system plant-wide. It blew up most of the glass tube spark gap enclosures the telco had on their incoming circuits. They spent a lot of time repairing/replacing them and getting our phone system back up.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27415315</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2012 08:11:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Surge Protection Residential Whole House</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27415313</link>
<description><![CDATA[49528867 posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1506715" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1506715');">Jack_in_VA</a>:</said><p>Really? IMO I hardly think that someone who specializes in communications is fully qualified across the spectrum of industrial and residential grounding. </p></div>Hate to tell ya this but if one is qualified to design a grounding system for a communications site then one is over qualified to design a residential grounding system. <br><br><div class="bquote"><p>That especially is true when your statements conflict with what some of us know and see practiced in the field and required in many areas.</p></div>Statements which have already been proven to be incorrect and not in compliance with both the NEC and published G&B standards.<br><br><div class="bquote"><p>If the bonding conductor reduces the potential difference to essentially "0", Then that would negate your belief that a ground rod would be needed.</p></div>Quite incorrect as bonding is not grounding and sadly you seem to fail to understand the difference between the two. <br><br><div class="bquote"><p>I have all my equipment grounded exactly the way they illustrate and I knew that long ago from my many courses and seminars on grounding and bonding.</p></div>Is that statement based on figure one which has multiple grounds bonded together which is the way I do things, which in turn you state is incorrect. <br><br><div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1506715" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1506715');">Jack_in_VA</a>:</said><p> &#147;Depending on the soil multiple ground rods can create potential differences between them causing problems.&#148;</p></div>Gee Jack you seem to want it both ways. <br><br><div class="bquote"><p>I don't think you really believe you can claim the article was incorrect.</p></div>Really, then please explain why when illustrating the preferred method in figure two the designer violated the PANI rule, which in my opinion further brings into question the grounding and bonding skills of the author. <br><br><div class="bquote"><p>Don't need luck Wayne. I'm covered. </p></div>Just like the head of an Ostrich. ;-)<br><br>Wayne<br><small>--<br>Madness takes its toll, please have exact change ready…</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27415313</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2012 08:10:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Surge Protection Residential Whole House</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27415308</link>
<description><![CDATA[Jack_in_VA posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1340949" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1340949');">SmokChsr</a>:</said><p><div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1506715" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1506715');">Jack_in_VA</a>:</said><p>I have a detached garage with a 100 amp panel fed by a 100 amp breaker off the meter base. The contractor/electrician installed a ground rod for the panel. The inspector made him remove the ground wire and run a #6 back to the the main ground rod for the service. He stated only one ground point is permitted.<br> </p></div>I don't doubt that.  Many times I've had to "hide" my protection systems until after the inspector is gone. Once the inspector signs off, then I can make it right.  If I left it the way the inspector wanted it the site would be blasted in days. <br><br>A few inspectors are good, and the rest only know how they think it should be. The NEC calls for 2 ground rods X feet apart at the electrical service entrance. This is a minimum requirement, and that's all some inspectors know, and they don't understand or care about what is involved in a higher level of protection. <br><br>In your particular example, what realistically would have been best was to add the second ground rod at the house entrance as required. Then to consider the out building as a separate entrance (which it really is) to that building and placing 2 rods at that location as well.    <br> </p></div>Not needed. Installation is exactly what the inspector required.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27415308</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2012 07:59:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Surge Protection Residential Whole House</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27415305</link>
<description><![CDATA[Jack_in_VA posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1340949" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1340949');">SmokChsr</a>:</said><p><div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1506715" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1506715');">Jack_in_VA</a>:</said><p>You have to know Wayne in spite of  what you think, say or write your opinions mean nothing except to you. The inspector is the only one who matters and if he says to do something do it. <br> </p></div>Until he leaves, then do it right. <br>If you read the NEC, (not something I do very often) you'll see for a fact that the inspector is WRONG! That leaves the question, are you going to do a proper job or just make the inspector happy at the cost of lost equipment, and dangerous conditions? <br> </p></div>Since it has 4 #6 conductors and is only 20 feet away from the building ground rod system, there was or is no reason to change it. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27415305</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2012 07:56:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Surge Protection Residential Whole House</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27415294</link>
<description><![CDATA[49528867 posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1340949" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1340949');">SmokChsr</a>:</said><p>I did have one of my site's blasted by lightning last summer. I thought that was a bit odd, so I started looking and quickly saw that apparently my old tower grounding straps must have been out of date, and some nice person had come by and spent great effort on their part to assist me by removing all that old bad copper. </p></div>Here's a tip (from a guy who knows grounding) to prevent that from happening in the future. ;-)<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.rwonline.com/article/no-soldering-iron-these-xlrs-crimp-on/24805" >www.rwonline.com/article/no-sold&middot;&middot;&middot;on/24805</A><br><br>Wayne<br><br> <br><small>--<br>Madness takes its toll, please have exact change ready…</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27415294</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2012 07:39:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Surge Protection Residential Whole House</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27414935</link>
<description><![CDATA[SmokChsr posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1506715" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1506715');">Jack_in_VA</a>:</said><p>You have to know Wayne in spite of  what you think, say or write your opinions mean nothing except to you. The inspector is the only one who matters and if he says to do something do it. <br> </p></div>Until he leaves, then do it right. <br>If you read the NEC, (not something I do very often) you'll see for a fact that the inspector is WRONG! That leaves the question, are you going to do a proper job or just make the inspector happy at the cost of lost equipment, and dangerous conditions? <br><br>"250.53(B) Electrode Spacing. Where more than one of the electrodes of the type specified in 250.52(A)(5) or (A)(7) are used, each electrode of one grounding system (including that used for air terminals) shall not be less than 1.83 m (6 ft) from any other electrode of another grounding system. Two or more grounding electrodes that are bonded together shall be considered a single grounding electrode system."]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27414935</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2012 00:04:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Surge Protection Residential Whole House</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27414898</link>
<description><![CDATA[SmokChsr posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1506715" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1506715');">Jack_in_VA</a>:</said><p>I have a detached garage with a 100 amp panel fed by a 100 amp breaker off the meter base. The contractor/electrician installed a ground rod for the panel. The inspector made him remove the ground wire and run a #6 back to the the main ground rod for the service. He stated only one ground point is permitted.<br> </p></div>I don't doubt that.  Many times I've had to "hide" my protection systems until after the inspector is gone. Once the inspector signs off, then I can make it right.  If I left it the way the inspector wanted it the site would be blasted in days. <br><br>A few inspectors are good, and the rest only know how they think it should be. The NEC calls for 2 ground rods X feet apart at the electrical service entrance. This is a minimum requirement, and that's all some inspectors know, and they don't understand or care about what is involved in a higher level of protection. <br><br>In your particular example, what realistically would have been best was to add the second ground rod at the house entrance as required. Then to consider the out building as a separate entrance (which it really is) to that building and placing 2 rods at that location as well.    ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27414898</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2012 23:45:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Surge Protection Residential Whole House</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27414883</link>
<description><![CDATA[nonymous posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1506715" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1506715');">Jack_in_VA</a>:</said><p>Really? IMO I hardly think that someone who specializes in communications is fully qualified across the spectrum of industrial and residential grounding. That would be a truly a unique individual. That especially is true when your statements conflict with what some of us know and see practiced in the field and required in many areas.<br><br> </p></div>What was the old bell system five nines up time. Grounding did have tons to do with that. You have circuits all the way from a CO out many, many miles into the field. Without proper grounding besides up time the noise would be canceling any signal. <br>Bell Labs did know grounding. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27414883</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2012 23:40:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Surge Protection Residential Whole House</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27414856</link>
<description><![CDATA[SmokChsr posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1506715" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1506715');">Jack_in_VA</a>:</said><p>Wayne I think I'll just stick with the recommendations of people  knowledgeable and educated in the field of grounding. I don't think you really believe you can claim the article was incorrect. <br> </p></div>I didn't read the article, but I did read Wayne's reply, and it looked dead on target to me.  If we have anything wrong in our lightning protection systems in this area, you'll tend to find out about it rather quickly. It's not uncommon for anyone of my sites to take 3-5 direct strikes a week during the summer.  <br><br>I did have one of my site's blasted by lightning last summer. I thought that was a bit odd, so I started looking and quickly saw that apparently my old tower grounding straps must have been out of date, and some nice person had come by and spent great effort on their part to assist me by removing all that old bad copper.  Unfortunately they seemed to have forgotten to come back and put in new copper to replace it. Still I guess I should be grateful that they cared enough to do half the job for me.  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27414856</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2012 23:29:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Surge Protection Residential Whole House</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27414232</link>
<description><![CDATA[Jack_in_VA posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1723898" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1723898');">49528867</a>:</said><p> <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1506715" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1506715');">Jack_in_VA</a>:</said><p>The inspector is the only one who matters and if he says to do something do it.  </p></div>Maybe in VA, but down here where we have the Board of Rules and Appeals (the BRA) and they have overruled a number of incorrect interpretations by the AHJ&#146;s<br><br>Wayne<br>    .<br> </p></div>Yes I know that but this is a small rural county and if a person wants to exist here he/she doesn't piss off the inspector. Is it right? No but a fact of life.<br><br>We've had people appeal the Wetlands Board decisions to the Circuit Court. Not a good outcome. The deck is stacked.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27414232</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2012 19:42:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Surge Protection Residential Whole House</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27414224</link>
<description><![CDATA[Jack_in_VA posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1723898" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1723898');">49528867</a>:</said><p><div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1506715" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1506715');">Jack_in_VA</a>:</said><p>Wayne I think I'll just stick with the recommendations of people  knowledgeable and educated in the field of grounding.</p></div></p></div><div class="bquote"><p>Guess what you have been communicating with one of those.</p></div>Really? IMO I hardly think that someone who specializes in communications is fully qualified across the spectrum of industrial and residential grounding. That would be a truly a unique individual. That especially is true when your statements conflict with what some of us know and see practiced in the field and required in many areas.<br><br>    <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>quote:</SMALL><HR>I don't think you really believe you can claim the article was incorrect.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br><br><div class="bquote"><p>I will admit I was incorrect in that statement but please remember it was based on your incorrect interpretation/misreading of the article and your mixing of personal opinions into the subject.<br><br>To be specific;<br><br>Your comment &#147;depending on the soil multiple ground rods can create potential differences between them causing problems.&#148;</p></div><div class="bquote"><p>Once bonded together that is false. </p></div>If the bonding conductor reduces the potential difference to essentially "0", Then that would negate your belief that  a ground rod would be needed.<br><br><div class="bquote"><p>Again your comment;<br><br>&#147;as the article states telco, catv etc should be tied together and brought to a single point ground with the building ground. Note they do not have multiple ground rods in their article.&#148;<br><br>If you carefully study the diagrams in the article you will notice there are no grounds depicted, as such I would say your point is irrelevant.<br></p></div>I have all my equipment grounded exactly the way they illustrate and I knew that long ago from my many courses and seminars on grounding and bonding.<br><br><div class="bquote"><p>Good luck there guy.</p></div>Don't need luck Wayne. I'm covered. <br><br>Wayne<br> ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27414224</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2012 19:39:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Surge Protection Residential Whole House</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27414153</link>
<description><![CDATA[49528867 posted :  <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1506715" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1506715');">Jack_in_VA</a>:</said><p>The inspector is the only one who matters and if he says to do something do it.  </p></div>Maybe in VA, but down here where we have the Board of Rules and Appeals (the BRA) and they have overruled a number of incorrect interpretations by the AHJ&#146;s<br><br>Wayne<br>    .<br><small>--<br>Madness takes its toll, please have exact change ready…</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27414153</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2012 19:18:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Surge Protection Residential Whole House</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27414125</link>
<description><![CDATA[Jack_in_VA posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1723898" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1723898');">49528867</a>:</said><p><div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1506715" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1506715');">Jack_in_VA</a>:</said><p>He did however make us install a second ground rod 5 foot from the existing rod and tie them together with #6 bare copper.<br><br>Be careful with advice and the best thing is to consult with your local electrical inspector. You can't go wrong doing that regardless of what you may see here.<br> </p></div>That depends on the inspector, for example when the AHJ required you to install an additional ground rod at five feet from the existing ground rod he had you violate NEC 250.53(B).<br><br>Rule of thumb when installing additional ground rods they should be spaced at least the length of one (10 feet).<br><br>Wayne<br><br>     <br> </p></div>You have to know Wayne in spite of  what you think, say or write your opinions mean nothing except to you. The inspector is the only one who matters and if he says to do something do it. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27414125</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2012 19:09:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Surge Protection Residential Whole House</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27414122</link>
<description><![CDATA[49528867 posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1506715" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1506715');">Jack_in_VA</a>:</said><p>We're not talking communications faciltites </p></div>None the less grounding and bonding is all the same regardless of the location, one may not to want to push it up to the level of a communications facility, but the basic principles remain the same.<br><br>And by the way, wasn't it you being critical of my ground system which was based upon the practices of the proper grounding and bonding of communications systems that began this diversion of this thread???<br><br>Wayne<br><br>Wayne    <br><small>--<br>Madness takes its toll, please have exact change ready&#133;</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27414122</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2012 19:09:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Surge Protection Residential Whole House</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27414112</link>
<description><![CDATA[Jack_in_VA posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1723898" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1723898');">49528867</a>:</said><p><div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1506715" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1506715');">Jack_in_VA</a>:</said><p>The contractor/electrician installed a ground rod for the panel. The inspector made him remove the ground wire and run a #6 back to the the main ground rod for the service. He stated only one ground point is permitted. </p></div>What a shame he didn't know better.<br><br>From my grounding manual published by RO Associates a leader in designing ground systems whose grounding and bonding for communications facilities course I attended a few years back.  <br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.protectiongroup.com/Ro-Associates" >www.protectiongroup.com/Ro-Associates</A><br><br>[att=1]<br><br>Wayne<br> </p></div>We're not talking communications faciltites]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27414112</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2012 19:06:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Surge Protection Residential Whole House</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27414085</link>
<description><![CDATA[49528867 posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1827055" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1827055');">iknow</a>:</said><p>that was for free air, assuming a .125" conductor 250 FT long. </p></div>That should be number six which is roughly .2 direct buried bare in contact with earth.<br><br>I get the feeling when you rerun the numbers you will find the impedance to be considerably lower.<br><br>Wayne <br><small>--<br>Madness takes its toll, please have exact change ready…</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27414085</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2012 18:57:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Surge Protection Residential Whole House</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27414069</link>
<description><![CDATA[49528867 posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/269768" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=269768');">nunya</a>:</said><p>That's incorrect. I drive a rod on every pool with a sub-panel. As long as it is bonded back to the main with a #6 or greater, it's perfectly compliant. It's not required, but it's not a violation. </p></div>Yes and even though it is not required, by doing so you are providing your customer with a considerably safer electrical system.<br><br>Wayne<br> <br><small>--<br>Madness takes its toll, please have exact change ready…</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27414069</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2012 18:51:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Surge Protection Residential Whole House</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27414065</link>
<description><![CDATA[nonymous posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1723898" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1723898');">49528867</a>:</said><p><div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/871781" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=871781');">nonymous</a>:</said><p>The one common grounding point should not preclude additional ground rods at the other building.  </p></div>The confusion many people have with grounding is the neutral bond to ground which the code restricts to only one, that aside there is no restriction or prohibition under the NEC which would stop a person from connecting additional earth grounds to the existing ground system as long as those additional grounds are all boned to the &#147;existing and required by code&#148; service ground.<br><br>Wayne<br> </p></div>True.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27414065</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2012 18:50:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Surge Protection Residential Whole House</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27414056</link>
<description><![CDATA[49528867 posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/871781" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=871781');">nonymous</a>:</said><p>The one common grounding point should not preclude additional ground rods at the other building.  </p></div>The confusion many people have with grounding is the neutral bond to ground which the code restricts to only one, that aside there is no restriction or prohibition under the NEC which would stop a person from connecting additional earth grounds to the existing ground system as long as those additional grounds are all boned to the &#147;existing and required by code&#148; service ground.<br><br>Wayne<br><small>--<br>Madness takes its toll, please have exact change ready…</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Surge-Protection-Residential-Whole-House-27414056</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2012 18:47:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
