 vrm3 join:2012-08-04 Trenton, NJ | [OOL] Email from Optonline tagged as spam. Anyone else?? More and more of the email I send from my optonline.net account is getting tagged as spam. Is anyone else experiencing this? This is a fairly recent development. Some, but not all, of these friends have received email from me using bcc, but these examples are from emails I send to them individually using to. Here are some examples of the tags various service providers are attaching to emails to friends:
From a friend with an MSN account: CM SPAM detection: spam User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0
From a State of New Jersey government server: CM SPAM detection: spam References: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0
From the servers of a college in Virginia: CM SPAM detection: spam References: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0
From an AOL account: CM SPAM detection: spam User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0
From Hotmail: CM SPAM detection: spam User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0
From a private business: CM SPAM detection: spam References: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 |
|
 JackarinoPremium join:2006-12-28 Allendale, NJ kudos:1 | I get this too, but what is marked as spam is actually spam |
|
 vrm3 join:2012-08-04 Trenton, NJ | But what I am sending is not spam. When my friends at those accounts get an email from me, my email is marked as spam. |
|
 JackarinoPremium join:2006-12-28 Allendale, NJ kudos:1 | Do some of these messages contain links? |
|
 NormanSPremium,MVM join:2001-02-14 San Jose, CA kudos:9 Reviews:
·SONIC.NET
·Pacific Bell - SBC
| reply to vrm3
said by vrm3:But what I am sending is not spam. When my friends at those accounts get an email from me, my email is marked as spam. Are you sending Bcc: with an email address in To:?
I just tried it two ways. First is with no email address in To:, and three in Bcc:. What I received:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1
To: undisclosed-recipients:;
Subject: [TEST] Proper use of Bcc:, I
Note the, "undisclosed-recipients:;" in the To: line. Mozilla Thunderbird adds that when To: is left blank. Most clients do similar.
Now, without a blank To: line:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: **********@aim.com
Subject: [TEST] Proper use of Bcc:, II
Many spammers send "Bcc:" with a blank "To:" line; and many spam-checkers flag that as likely spam.
Create a 'throwaway' email address, one which you won't use for anything else, and start with, "To: 'throwaway@example.com'", then build your Bcc: list.
-- Norman ~Oh Lord, why have you come ~To Konnyu, with the Lion and the Drum |
|
 Reviews:
·Optimum Online
| reply to vrm3 If you change what is in the to field and it's not marked as spam, then you found the problem.
Also, it can't hurt to disable any signature to see if something in the signature is causing the spam flag to be thrown.
Lastly, try sending from webmail instead of an email client and see if it happens too. |
|
 vrm3 join:2012-08-04 Trenton, NJ | To: Jackarino, NormanS, and frdrizzt Some of the emails to individuals using "To" do have links in them. They have been tagged as Spam by some friends email providers. Any idea on a work around? I do not attach a signature to my emails. Whenever I use BCC I leave the "To" line blank. I've been doing this for quite a number of years without my messages being flagged as Spam. Do you think if I added an address in the "To" line when I am mailing to several dozen friends using BCC it may address the Spam labeling problem? Thanks for your advice, insight and questions! |
|
 Reviews:
·Optimum Online
| Is the issue that some individuals have all messages marked as spam, or that some have some marked as spam?
If the messages are being marked as spam, and including an address (possibly even your own email if otherwise empty) in To doesn't change it, then you'll need a recipient to contact their provider, or to contact the provider on their behalf about messages being marked as spam. |
|
 tmpchaosRequiescat in pacePremium,Mod join:2000-04-28 Hoboken, NJ | reply to vrm3 Go here: »www.spamhaus.org/lookup/ and enter in your IP. Post the results, after removing your IP. |
|
 NormanSPremium,MVM join:2001-02-14 San Jose, CA kudos:9 Reviews:
·SONIC.NET
·Pacific Bell - SBC
| Unless OP is sending "direct-to-MX" from a residential IP address, that should not matter. I have sent thousands (over several years!) of email from a Spamhaus PBL listed IP address with no trouble; but I've always gone through my ISP SMTP server, even when running my own mail server. -- Norman ~Oh Lord, why have you come ~To Konnyu, with the Lion and the Drum |
|
 NormanSPremium,MVM join:2001-02-14 San Jose, CA kudos:9 Reviews:
·SONIC.NET
·Pacific Bell - SBC
| reply to vrm3 said by vrm3:Do you think if I added an address in the "To" line when I am mailing to several dozen friends using BCC it may address the Spam labeling problem? It might. "Undisclosed recipients" is often associated with spam. Even if it doesn't, it is still a good practice.
Yahoo! Mail Plus (pay service) allows to create up to 500 "throwaway" email addresses. MSN's new "Outlook.com" service allows the user to create aliases. -- Norman ~Oh Lord, why have you come ~To Konnyu, with the Lion and the Drum |
|
 vrm3 join:2012-08-04 Trenton, NJ | reply to NormanS I don't run a mail server. I just send lots of email from my Optonline.net account using Thunderbird.
This is what happened when I entered my IP address
Blocklist Lookup Results
69.125.205.65 is not listed in the SBL 69.125.205.65 is listed in the PBL, in the following records: PBL112429 69.125.205.65 is not listed in the XBL
When I clicked on PBL112429 this is what came up
Ref: PBL112429
69.112.0.0/12 is listed on the Policy Block List (PBL) ________________________________________
Outbound Email Policy of Cablevision/OptimumOnline for this IP range:
(Jan 2007) Email sent from this IP block via port 25 (SMTP) or port 587 (SMTP-Submit) should be sent only via the designated outbound mail server for OptimumOnline customers: mail.optonline.net
See OOL's support site at »optimum.custhelp.com/cgi-bin/opt···faqid=39
Standard-tier OOL customers are blocked from sending/receiving mail via port 25 (SMTP) to any other servers since 2004. See OOL support site: »optimum.custhelp.com/cgi-bin/opt···aqid=876
You may send mail via another ISP by using SMTP-Submit (port 587) service, if your ISP's mail server supports this service.
mail.optonline.net appears to support sending mail via port 587 as well, but we can't find any reference to this service on their support website - we presume it's a "non-supported feature".
Many ISPs seem to block directly-received mail from OOL dynamic space by hostname (E.g.: *.dyn.optonline.net hosts) or by numeric IP block independent from DNSBL listings. Removing an IP from PBL will NOT get you unblocked with such an ISP!
Unless you run your own mail server, you SHOULD NOT remove your IP from PBL - there's simply nothing to gain from it. Even if you have your own mail server, it's probably better to relay your mail through mail.optonline.net.
All PBL-listed endusers (not just OOL) who find themselves blocked from sending mail via port 587 to third parties due to PBL listings MUST CONTACT THEIR THIRD-PARTY ISP OR MAIL PROVIDER TO RESOLVE THIS. Please point your ISP to This FAQ entry about this very topic. This 2nd FAQ entry may also apply. Please contact Spamhaus here if this is verifiably occurring, and your ISP insists that "nothing is wrong".
________________________________________
Removal Procedure
If you are not using normal email software but instead are running a mail server and you are the owner of a Static IP address in the range 69.112.0.0/12 and you have a legitimate reason for operating a mail server on this IP, you can automatically remove (suppress) your static IP address from the PBL database.
________________________________________
About The PBL
The Spamhaus Policy Block List ("PBL") is an international anti-spam system maintained by The Spamhaus Project in conjunction with Internet Service Providers and is used by Internet networks to enforce inbound email policies. The PBL database lists end-user IP address ranges which should not be delivering unauthenticated email to any mail server except those provided for specifically for that customer's use. The PBL lists only IP addresses (not domains or email addresses).
For full information on how the PBL operates please see the PBL Home page and the PBL Frequently Asked Questions. ________________________________________ Associated Documents
PBL Home PBL FAQs How Blocklists Work |
|
 NormanSPremium,MVM join:2001-02-14 San Jose, CA kudos:9 Reviews:
·SONIC.NET
·Pacific Bell - SBC
| The Spamhaus PBL is based on ISP submissions. If your IP address is in the Spamhaus PBL, OOL submitted it, and only OOL can unlist it. In any case, if you send email through the OOL SMTP Message Submission servers a PBL listing should not affect your email. -- Norman ~Oh Lord, why have you come ~To Konnyu, with the Lion and the Drum |
|
 | reply to vrm3 I didn't think about it before, but you can try swapping the SMPT mail server to port 587 & enable authentication. Maybe the authentication would "take points off" from their spam calculation. |
|
 NormanSPremium,MVM join:2001-02-14 San Jose, CA kudos:9 Reviews:
·SONIC.NET
·Pacific Bell - SBC
| said by frdrizzt:I didn't think about it before, but you can try swapping the SMPT mail server to port 587 & enable authentication. Maybe the authentication would "take points off" from their spam calculation. It does not work that way. Receiving server does not see the message submission port, or the sender's IP address. Receiving only sees the IP address of the sender's Email Service Provider's servers; which servers, by definition, always use port 25. -- Norman ~Oh Lord, why have you come ~To Konnyu, with the Lion and the Drum |
|
 vrm3 join:2012-08-04 Trenton, NJ | reply to NormanS Earlier this year I got a call from OOL security who told me that my account had been hacked by an oversea spammer and was being used to send out spam. I had to change my password and all of my security questions. I wonder if that is how I got on that list. |
|
|
|
 NormanSPremium,MVM join:2001-02-14 San Jose, CA kudos:9 Reviews:
·SONIC.NET
·Pacific Bell - SBC
| said by vrm3:Earlier this year I got a call from OOL security who told me that my account had been hacked by an oversea spammer and was being used to send out spam. I had to change my password and all of my security questions. I wonder if that is how I got on that list. Probably not the Spamhaus PBL; your neighbors at .64 and .66 are also listed. PBL is a list of IP addresses submitted by the owners as prohibited from acting as mail servers. OOL submitted the IP addresses because they should not be connecting directly to Mail eXchangers (MXes). -- Norman ~Oh Lord, why have you come ~To Konnyu, with the Lion and the Drum |
|
 Parth join:2010-08-16 Poughkeepsie, NY | And yet we're allowed to host our own mail server on Boost Plus and higher? |
|