site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Posting?
Post a:
Post a:
Links: ·Web page ·Network Status ·RR FORUM FAQ ·Cable Users FAQ ·Tweaks ·Broadband Modem
AuthorAll Replies


antdude
A Ninja Ant
Premium,VIP
join:2001-03-25
United State
kudos:4
Reviews:
·RoadRunner Cable

reply to Suit Up

Re: Do these results look from a new bundled $89.99 service?

said by Suit Up:

I've got the same modem with similar signal levels. It's been working fine for me for months.

TWC HD is not going to look as good as OTA HD no matter what connection you use because TWC puts 3 HD feeds on one channel so they have to re-encode the video at a lower bitrate to make them all fit.

So, it's not worth getting HDMI over composite cables then? Darn! I was hoping a slightly better picture with HDMI. I already miss OTA. :P


Suit Up

join:2003-07-21
Los Angeles, CA

HDMI will just help you see the compression better.



antdude
A Ninja Ant
Premium,VIP
join:2001-03-25
United State
kudos:4
Reviews:
·RoadRunner Cable

1 edit

said by Suit Up:

HDMI will just help you see the compression better.

LOL! :O

I wished TWC and other cable companies would do better with their HD video feeds.


mackey

join:2007-08-20
kudos:3

reply to antdude

said by antdude:

So, it's not worth getting HDMI over composite cables then?

Assuming you really do mean composite (and not component), then yes, HDMI will be MUCH better as composite cannot carry HD signals. If the source is progressive and not interlaced, using composite also interlaces the signal causing your TV to then need to deinterlace it.

While TWC does recompress the video, spend the $3 on a HDMI cable before writing the PQ off. As it's a digital signal, don't bother buying an expensive "high quality, gold/platinum/unobtanium plated" cable as it will just be a waste of money and will not work any better then a cheap cable.

/M


antdude
A Ninja Ant
Premium,VIP
join:2001-03-25
United State
kudos:4
Reviews:
·RoadRunner Cable

1 edit

said by mackey:

said by antdude:

So, it's not worth getting HDMI over composite cables then?

Assuming you really do mean composite (and not component), then yes, HDMI will be MUCH better as composite cannot carry HD signals. If the source is progressive and not interlaced, using composite also interlaces the signal causing your TV to then need to deinterlace it.

While TWC does recompress the video, spend the $3 on a HDMI cable before writing the PQ off. As it's a digital signal, don't bother buying an expensive "high quality, gold/platinum/unobtanium plated" cable as it will just be a waste of money and will not work any better then a cheap cable.

/M

TWC guy connected new cables (red, white, and yellow colors). The picture edges show some blurriness and double edges too compared to clear OTA. I did not see any interlaced horizontal lines.


Jabbu
Premium
join:2002-03-06

WTF, I thought you meant component. You'll go from a 80s pic to today's pic going from composite cables to component/hdmi.

Component = red/green/blue for pic red/white for audio.



antdude
A Ninja Ant
Premium,VIP
join:2001-03-25
United State
kudos:4
Reviews:
·RoadRunner Cable

said by Jabbu:

WTF, I thought you meant component. You'll go from a 80s pic to today's pic going from composite cables to component/hdmi.

Component = red/green/blue for pic red/white for audio.

OK, I will just go to HDMI directly for the latest, single cable (tired of having multiple cables!), and best quality (blurry videos sucks after seeing OTA HD with it!). I still can't believe TWC gave me old school cables with its leased new Motorola DCX3400 DVR and new 22" Samsung HDTV.

Tuesday, 18-Jun 17:18:11 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 13.5 years online © 1999-2013 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics