dslreports logo
site
 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery
spc

spacer




how-to block ads


Search Topic:
uniqs
6
share rss forum feed


djrobx
Premium
join:2000-05-31
Valencia, CA
kudos:2
Reviews:
·Time Warner Cable
·VOIPO
reply to pnh102

Re: Pointless

said by pnh102:

quote:
... the demonstration itself required the use of an Internet2 connection, and even after compression the NHK/Sharp prototype television still required 360Mbit/s to display the 8K signal.
Cable companies already compress the heck out of HD... and while I don't know if off air broadcasters do the same, there's is definitely a noticeable quality difference between the off-air signal and the cable display of the same channel.

If compression is used... what's the point?

Exactly. I wondered the same thing when HD came about. A really good double-layer DVD with anamorphic encoding still looks pretty good on a moderate (<= 42") sized TV. Why don't we work on decreasing the compression levels a bit before worrying about upping the resolution.

All of the providers who advertise their 1080p VOD as "Blu-Ray Quality" just because it's 1080p make me want to scream. Bitrate people, bitrate!

-- Rob
--
AT&T U-Hearse - RIP Unlimited Internet 1995-2011
Rethink Billable.