dslreports logo
 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery
spc
uniqs
13
nonymous (banned)
join:2003-09-08
Glendale, AZ

nonymous (banned) to 49528867

Member

to 49528867

Re: Surge Protection Residential Whole House

That is what i am thinking. The one common grounding point should not preclude additional ground rods at the other building. Just the one common point is still needed. Plus I always learned in most basic setups you need a ground rod at both ends of a cable outside. Then on top of that a common ground in most setups even if it is just say a continuous cable sheath.
49528867 (banned)
join:2010-04-16
Fort Lauderdale, FL

1 recommendation

49528867 (banned)

Member

said by nonymous:

The one common grounding point should not preclude additional ground rods at the other building.

The confusion many people have with grounding is the neutral bond to ground which the code restricts to only one, that aside there is no restriction or prohibition under the NEC which would stop a person from connecting additional earth grounds to the existing ground system as long as those additional grounds are all boned to the “existing and required by code” service ground.

Wayne
nonymous (banned)
join:2003-09-08
Glendale, AZ

nonymous (banned)

Member

said by 49528867:

said by nonymous:

The one common grounding point should not preclude additional ground rods at the other building.

The confusion many people have with grounding is the neutral bond to ground which the code restricts to only one, that aside there is no restriction or prohibition under the NEC which would stop a person from connecting additional earth grounds to the existing ground system as long as those additional grounds are all boned to the “existing and required by code” service ground.

Wayne

True.