dslreports logo
 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery
spc
uniqs
23
« I can confirm this story
This is a sub-selection from Oooooooh!

Oh_No
Trogglus normalus
join:2011-05-21
Chicago, IL

Oh_No to techguyga

Member

to techguyga

Re: Oooooooh!

said by techguyga:

said by Oh_No :
It is based on the speed of electricity vs the speed of light vs the speed of radio waves. Now fiber based on the speed of light would be faster. Coax is around 70% the speed of light. Fixed wireless would be close to the speed of light and faster than coax.
Sorry, but this made me laugh. I hope you're not being serious. :-/

Why would you laugh with facts?
The speed of particles passing through a certain media varies.
You can even slow down light through certain media if you want to, I think I just blew your mind.

Here is a quick wiki for those that need to open their eyes to reality: »en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sp ··· ctricity

I was pointing out that LTE is not having higher ping times due to being wireless vs. a wired landline.
Just looking at the conductor, wireless will have lower ping times than any coax connection.

If someone is having higher latency on LTE wireless over coax line then it is purely from crappy equipment not because it is wireless.

You=pwned

techguyga
Premium Member
join:2003-12-31
00000
ARRIS BGW210-700

techguyga

Premium Member

The speed of light/electricity/radio is all the same in a vacuum. Air is a neutral medium and does not significantly affect radio or light energy as it passes through.

In your example, you said that "coax is around 70% the speed of light." Simply not true. The Wikipedia article you referenced sites an article between 2 hacks that are discussing attenuation and signal loss. It has nothing to do with how fast the signal passes across the medium. Energy passing across the medium will only be slowed by the other equipment that it passes through, such as transmitters, repeaters, receivers, etc. The same holds true for radio waves.

Light, however, passing through optical media travels about 35% slower than the speed of light, depending on the refractive index of the media. Again, this is not significant, but it renders your statement incorrect, hence my chuckle.

Check your facts.
techguyga

techguyga

Premium Member

Oh, and I missed the you=pwned bit the first time I read your reply.

Thanks for another laugh. That's so 2000's. Hahaha!

Oh_No
Trogglus normalus
join:2011-05-21
Chicago, IL

Oh_No

Member

You are such a sad person.
You even said I was right by saying how light is slowed in fiber medium.
So sad.
I guess you pwned yourself?

techguyga
Premium Member
join:2003-12-31
00000
ARRIS BGW210-700

techguyga

Premium Member

I'm not sad at all. If you check my bio, you'll see that I am in the business of getting data from one place to the next, and I've been doing it for a LONG time. I just think it laughable that in your previous statement that you think that fiber is the fastest, followed by wireless, followed by coax.

I'm also not in the business of name calling, but in the spirit of your posts...

You=immature and childish

Oh_No
Trogglus normalus
join:2011-05-21
Chicago, IL

Oh_No

Member

Electricity flows at different speeds through different media, like I said.
Oh_No

Oh_No to techguyga

Member

to techguyga
Aside from your negativity and unwillingness to go by reality.

I guess in all your years of wisdom you never ordered cable before and have no idea what a velocity factor is.

»www.nr6ca.org/vf.html
Some can be as low as 66% of the speed of light and some as high as 88%

pwned again.
Check your facts please.
Oh_No

Oh_No to techguyga

Member

to techguyga
Got nothing to say now when I through the facts at you?
« I can confirm this story
This is a sub-selection from Oooooooh!