<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;4 Bonded Upstream&#x27; in forum &#x27;Time Warner Internet Services&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/4-Bonded-Upstream-27436889</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 01:35:43 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 01:35:43 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: 4 Bonded Upstream</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-4-Bonded-Upstream-27439018</link>
<description><![CDATA[horseshoe posted : Stop:  I want your Upstream here in So Cal.  Stop:  I have the Doc 3 modem.  Stop:  Wait more time.  Stop:  TWC, want more $?  <br>Upstream Bonded Channels<br>Channel	Lock Status	US Channel Type	Channel ID	Symbol Rate	Frequency	Power<br>1	Locked	ATDMA	5	5120 Ksym/sec	30700000 Hz	36.9 dBmV<br>2	Not Locked	Unknown	0	0 Ksym/sec	0 Hz	0.0 dBmV<br>3	Not Locked	Unknown	0	0 Ksym/sec	0 Hz	0.0 dBmV<br>4	Not Locked	Unknown	0	0 Ksym/sec	0 Hz	0.0 dBmV]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-4-Bonded-Upstream-27439018</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2012 21:23:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 4 Bonded Upstream</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-4-Bonded-Upstream-27438931</link>
<description><![CDATA[Suit Up posted : Oh I understand all that, I just think it's amusing you used the term "legacy" when my modem (which I've had probably about 6 months now) is still using it.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-4-Bonded-Upstream-27438931</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2012 20:38:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 4 Bonded Upstream</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-4-Bonded-Upstream-27438913</link>
<description><![CDATA[DrDrew posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/843986" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=843986');">Suit Up</a>:</said><p>Ah.  Thanks for the info DrDrew.  Funny you say DOCSIS 1 is for legacy devices, my DOCSIS 2.0 modem still uses a DOCSIS 1 upstream (although it did have DOCSIS 2.0 for a couple of days a week or 2 ago).<br> </p></div>DOCSIS 3 and 2 can still use DOCSIS 1 channels... why shouldn't they? It's all usable bandwidth.<br><br>It's just DOCSIS 1 devices can't use DOCSIS 2 channels. They're not able to tune to 6.4 Mhz wide channels or decode ABOVE 16QAM modulation.<br><br>If no DOCSIS 1 channels are available, a DOCSIS 1 device can't get online.<br><small>--<br>If it's important, back it up... twice. <A HREF="http://stopthecap.com/2010/12/27/hawaiian-telcom-phone-lines-and-dsl-broadband-go-dead-for-days-because-it-rained/">Even 99.999% availability isn't enough sometimes.</a></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-4-Bonded-Upstream-27438913</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2012 20:31:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 4 Bonded Upstream</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-4-Bonded-Upstream-27438784</link>
<description><![CDATA[Suit Up posted : Ah.  Thanks for the info DrDrew.  Funny you say DOCSIS 1 is for legacy devices, my DOCSIS 2.0 modem still uses a DOCSIS 1 upstream (although it did have DOCSIS 2.0 for a couple of days a week or 2 ago).]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-4-Bonded-Upstream-27438784</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2012 19:34:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 4 Bonded Upstream</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-4-Bonded-Upstream-27438747</link>
<description><![CDATA[DrDrew posted : 16QAM is used for better noise handling... it can get away with SNR being 6dB (4x) lower than QAM64. The trade off is it has 2/3s the bandwidth per hz.<br><br>DOCSIS 1 channels are used for legacy devices... like some older ADSG cable boxes and power supply status monitoring.<br><small>--<br>If it's important, back it up... twice. <A HREF="http://stopthecap.com/2010/12/27/hawaiian-telcom-phone-lines-and-dsl-broadband-go-dead-for-days-because-it-rained/">Even 99.999% availability isn't enough sometimes.</a></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-4-Bonded-Upstream-27438747</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2012 19:15:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 4 Bonded Upstream</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-4-Bonded-Upstream-27438176</link>
<description><![CDATA[CptGemini posted : My guess would be that its a way to help distribute the bandwidth across the channels better so it don't hog up all bandwidth on those channels for D2/D1 modem users.<br><small>--<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.akaskriller.com" >www.akaskriller.com</A> - Your ultimate source for all android needs.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-4-Bonded-Upstream-27438176</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2012 14:58:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 4 Bonded Upstream</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-4-Bonded-Upstream-27438112</link>
<description><![CDATA[bluepoint posted : Wow  kilrathi <A HREF="/useremail/u/1193466"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>, it looks like you have wiring problem somewhere.  I've seen around you've been on top of your problem and TWC hasn't solve the mystery?<br>AFAIC, we have a steady/stable connections, in fact, since I acquired the docsis 3 modem, the upstream power got better.  When I had the docsis 2 modem(single channel), my upstream power would go from 46 to 55dBmV depending on the freq.  The lower the frequency the higher the power.  But now with the docsis 3 all 4 channels are about in low power ranges, and sometimes the lowest frequency registers with a better reading.  I was told lower frequency uses higher power but now it seems not to support that theory.  What do I know anyway? ;) <br>As to why we use 16QAM for the upstream, I want to know also.  Maybe  DrDrew <A HREF="/useremail/u/1616010"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> can give some idea on these things.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-4-Bonded-Upstream-27438112</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2012 14:26:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 4 Bonded Upstream</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-4-Bonded-Upstream-27438091</link>
<description><![CDATA[bluepoint posted :  Suit Up <A HREF="/useremail/u/843986"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> I'm not knowledgeable enough to answer your question as to why TWC chooses those modulations but if you have time read some from &raquo;<A HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quadrature_amplitude_modulation" >en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quadrature&middot;&middot;&middot;dulation</A> I tried to understand what's written at wikipedia but it still doesn't register on this pea brain. :(<br>Or  DrDrew <A HREF="/useremail/u/1616010"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> or hobs can explain better.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-4-Bonded-Upstream-27438091</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2012 14:10:13 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 4 Bonded Upstream</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-4-Bonded-Upstream-27437068</link>
<description><![CDATA[kilrathi posted : not sure but i have same combination and i am forced to use splitters so that the atdma channels t4 timeout and as soon as that happens i remove splitters and keeps connection working but this way i have no packet loss because in my area the atdma experience interference, the lines here are not ready for it and there is packet loss when I use them. I hope they all running good for you. Although in your case I noticed even atdma running at 16QAM, in my case they try to run 64QAM and it simply too much noise for it.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-4-Bonded-Upstream-27437068</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2012 23:52:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 4 Bonded Upstream</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-4-Bonded-Upstream-27437054</link>
<description><![CDATA[Suit Up posted : Why is there a mixture of DOCSIS 1/TDMA and DOCSIS 2/ATDMA?  Is there a technological advantage to that, or is it because the channels are shared with people who only have DOCSIS 1 modems?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-4-Bonded-Upstream-27437054</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2012 23:46:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 4 Bonded Upstream</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-4-Bonded-Upstream-27436977</link>
<description><![CDATA[hobgoblin posted : Welcome to the party!<br><br>Hob]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-4-Bonded-Upstream-27436977</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2012 23:00:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>4 Bonded Upstream</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/4-Bonded-Upstream-27436889</link>
<description><![CDATA[bluepoint posted : Looks like our division is ready to boogie. :D<div class="borderless"><TABLE WIDTH=95% align=center border=0 CELLPADDING=4"><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/27436889?c=2026415&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IyNzQzNjg4OS54bWw%3D"><IMG TITLE="16009 bytes" BORDER=0 WIDTH=500 HEIGHT=95 SRC="/r0/download/2026415~5c5b8e160d264d51441e3f04e0ab213f/upstream.jpg"></A><br>Upstream</TD></TABLE></div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/4-Bonded-Upstream-27436889</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2012 22:12:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
