DavesnothereNo-BHELL-ity DOES have its Advantages
join:2009-06-15
START&Cogeco
kudos:6
2 edits | reply to Davesnothere
Choosing the Primary SIP server
I feel that it is also worth mentioning, that in the above screenshot, there is an additional tab called Geo. POP.
This tab seems to be functioning to Choose the Primary SIP server at Anveo, something which I thought was only necessary to do (and had done) within my ATA »www.anveo.com/faq.asp?code=linksys-pap-2t , along with setting the DNS SRV parameters there to ENABLED.
I changed this portal setting to the Canadian server (matching my ATA settings) and saved the change.
Not sure whether/what difference it made, as things continued to work. |
|
anveoPremium
join:2010-02-08
kudos:1 | Thanks for sharing your test results.
said by Davesnothere:...Not sure whether/what difference it made, as things continued to work...
That is the beauty of Anveo infrastructure as all Anveo POPs operate as a single Eco System. So ATA device can be registered with one POP and incoming calls can be routed to another POP and everything will be working as expected 
Because of that things like DNS_SRV and failover will work seamlessly and reliably.
P.S to answer your other question we do not support outbound CNAM. |
|
DavesnothereNo-BHELL-ity DOES have its Advantages
join:2009-06-15
START&Cogeco
kudos:6
1 edit | said by anveo:Thanks for sharing your test results....
Glad to do it !
I plan to add more numbers/carriers examples into the 2nd post of the thread.
And thanks for weighing in.
While you are here (if you still are), then would you clarify please as to whether the Geo. POP server setting in the Anveo web portal (which I above described) has priority over the one in our ATA, or vice versa, or some other scenario ?
Do we need to set both of them the same server in order to be sure that default routing will be optimized to use that server ?
As for the no Outbound CNAM - not a biggie - it's less important to me that other folks see my name than whether I see theirs - though both would be nice too. |
|
 TrimlinePremium
join:2004-10-24
Windermere, FL
 ·Callcentric
| reply to anveo
said by anveo:P.S to answer your other question we do not support outbound CNAM.
That's a pretty big thing. I would suggest you work on providing this to attract more customers. Both of my providers offered this with no issue. |
|
|
|
DavesnothereNo-BHELL-ity DOES have its Advantages
join:2009-06-15
START&Cogeco
kudos:6 | said by Trimline:That's a pretty big thing [Outbound CNAM].
I would suggest you work on providing this to attract more customers.
Both of my providers offered this with no issue.
I would think that business subscribers would care more about outbound CNAM than average folks like me.
But having said that, 2 things want to enter my mind - the names of your 2 providers ?  
And are they VoIP or something else ? |
|
DavesnothereNo-BHELL-ity DOES have its Advantages
join:2009-06-15
START&Cogeco
kudos:6
1 edit | reply to anveo
said by anveo:....P.S to answer your other question - we do not support outbound CNAM.
It took me most of the afternoon to digest that comment, its consquences, and their relationship to my research.
You see, when I posted my results above, one of the callers was my CallCentric number.
I reviewed this page of their FAQ »www.callcentric.com/faq/31/222 and its says that [like Anveo], that THEY do NOT broadcast outbound CNAM either.
OK fine then, but I now have a MYSTERY on my hands.
WHERE did Anveo get my proper name from the incoming CallCentric call ?
I had drawn some conclusions in my 'early results' post above, but that was based on my previous assumption that CallCentric broadcasts outbound CNAM.
Now I have to figure out how the CNAM seems to have made it thru on that call.
Any ideas ? |
|
 UHFAll static, all day, ForeverPremium,MVM
join:2002-05-24
·Callcentric
 ·DIRECTV
 ·surpasshosting
| I would assume that SIP to SIP calls work differently and don't use CNAM. But then, if you dialed a regular 1+ number to call from CC to Anveo, did the call traverse the PSTN or go via SIP the entire way? Inquiring minds want to know |
|
| said by UHF:I would assume that SIP to SIP calls work differently and don't use CNAM. But then, if you dialed a regular 1+ number to call from CC to Anveo, did the call traverse the PSTN or go via SIP the entire way? Inquiring minds want to know
PSTN was involved at some point.
--
DPC3825 - WRT610N - SPA2102 - Asterisk 1.8.11.0 with Asterisk GUI on Virtual Server
Anveo - Voxbeam - Localphone - Numbergroup - Callcentric- VoIP.MS - UKDDI |
|
Reviews:
 ·Optimum Online
·Callcentric
 ·Verizon FiOS
| reply to Davesnothere
said by Davesnothere:said by anveo:....P.S to answer your other question - we do not support outbound CNAM.
It took me most of the afternoon to digest that comment, its consquences, and their relationship to my research. You see, when I posted my results above, one of the callers was my CallCentric number. I reviewed this page of their FAQ » www.callcentric.com/faq/31/222 and its says that [like Anveo], that THEY do NOT broadcast outbound CNAM either. OK fine then, but I now have a MYSTERY on my hands. WHERE did Anveo get my proper name from the incoming CallCentric call ? I had drawn some conclusions in my 'early results' post above, but that was based on my previous assumption that CallCentric broadcasts outbound CNAM. Now I have to figure out how the CNAM seems to have made it thru on that call. Any ideas ? Is your Callcentric number in your Anveo contact list under your name? |
|
PX EliezerPremium
join:2008-08-09
Hutt River
kudos:13 Reviews:
·callwithus
·voip.ms
·Optimum Voice
·Vitelity VOIP
·Gizmo5
| reply to Davesnothere
said by Davesnothere:You see, when I posted my results above, one of the callers was my CallCentric number.
I reviewed this page of their FAQ »www.callcentric.com/faq/31/222 and its says that [like Anveo], that THEY do NOT broadcast outbound CNAM either....
As you know, it's not so much a matter of broadcast but rather of LIDB population.
My personal and quite unofficial impression is that although CC does not officially support outbound CNAM, they do try to provide it when possible.... |
|
DavesnothereNo-BHELL-ity DOES have its Advantages
join:2009-06-15
START&Cogeco
kudos:6 | reply to UHF
said by UHF:I would assume that SIP to SIP calls work differently and don't use CNAM.
But then, if you dialed a regular 1+ number to call from CC to Anveo, did the call traverse the PSTN or go via SIP the entire way?
Inquiring minds want to know
I did not go SIP to SIP.
Gotta try that sometime.
@ GT : So it must have used PSTN at some point, in order to complete my call, yes ? |
|
DavesnothereNo-BHELL-ity DOES have its Advantages
join:2009-06-15
START&Cogeco
kudos:6 | reply to JoeSchmoe007
said by JoeSchmoe007:Is your Callcentric number in your Anveo contact list under your name?
No, I have not set up a contact list yet on my Anveo account.
However, my CallCentric external DID number prob'ly IS in my CallCentric address book, though doubt that it would matter in this particular test. |
|
DavesnothereNo-BHELL-ity DOES have its Advantages
join:2009-06-15
START&Cogeco
kudos:6
1 edit | reply to PX Eliezer
said by PX Eliezer:said by Davesnothere:You see, when I posted my results above, one of the callers was my CallCentric number.
I reviewed this page of their FAQ »www.callcentric.com/faq/31/222 and its says that [like Anveo], that THEY do NOT broadcast outbound CNAM either....
As you know, it's not so much a matter of broadcast but rather of LIDB population. My personal and quite unofficial impression is that although CC does not officially support outbound CNAM, they do try to provide it when possible....
I had a feeling that you would offer such an analysis.
So, should there be any way for me to determine for sure what is happening, possibly either from my Anveo portal call logs, or by fiddling with the NAME fields of my Callcentric portal 'address' page ? (mentioned in my 'Early Results' post)
And just to muddy the waters a bit, did somebody here recently post that VOIP.MS broadcasts outbound CNAM, and if yes, under what conditions and costs ? |
|
idbit
join:2008-12-04
Florida | reply to Trimline
said by Trimline:said by anveo:P.S to answer your other question we do not support outbound CNAM.
That's a pretty big thing. I would suggest you work on providing this to attract more customers. Both of my providers offered this with no issue. I thought I read that in the US, the CNAM that appears on a call coming in to you is determined by your provider - not anything that is set by the caller or his provider. Which would make Outbound CNAM a pointless feature for somebody in the US that only calls US people. Am I wrong about that? |
|
| reply to Davesnothere
It is possible the name information was pass from your PAP2T-NA (or whatever ATA or IP Phone that you are using) "Display Name:" field? Try playing with this field with different information to see what is displayed on incoming calls to your Anveo DID.
At one stage, I could change the "Display Name:" field to any 15-character and it would displayed on the incoming T-Mobile @Home system.
said by Davesnothere:
So, should there be any way for me to determine for sure what is happening, possibly either from my Anveo portal call logs, or by fiddling with the NAME fields of my Callcentric portal 'address' page ? (mentioned in my 'Early Results' post)
|
|
 TrevIP Telephony AddictPremium
join:2009-06-29
Victoria, BC
kudos:4 | reply to idbit
said by idbit:I thought I read that in the US, the CNAM that appears on a call coming in to you is determined by your provider - not anything that is set by the caller or his provider. Which would make Outbound CNAM a pointless feature for somebody in the US that only calls US people. Am I wrong about that?
There is an authoritative source (the Line Information Database) that all LECs (local exchange carriers -- the companies that provide DIDs to VoIP providers) are required to maintain.
In the US, "outbound CNAM" means entering a CNAM value into this LIDB.
If the call recipient's phone company is willing to pay to access the caller's LIDB, they will be able to access this CNAM value and display it to their customer.
Sometimes, the call recipient's phone company doesn't want to pay to access the caller's LIDB, so they subscribe to a third party CNAM database. This database collects caller name information from other sources, such as phone book listings, and is a guess what the caller's name is. It's also generally much more economical as a single company can provide this information, rather than a number of companies spread out through the country (one for each major telco plus a few independents).
--
Wondering what I do? Find out at »www.digitalcon.ca
Get your Obihai ATA in Canada. |
|
DavesnothereNo-BHELL-ity DOES have its Advantages
join:2009-06-15
START&Cogeco
kudos:6
2 edits | reply to DaveSin
said by Davesnothere:So, should there be any way for me to determine for sure what is happening, possibly either from my Anveo portal call logs, or by fiddling with the NAME fields of my Callcentric portal 'address' page ? (mentioned in my 'Early Results' post)
said by DaveSin:It is possible the name information was passed from your PAP2T-NA (or whatever ATA or IP Phone that you are using) "Display Name:" field? Try playing with this field with different information to see what is displayed on incoming calls to your Anveo DID.
At one stage, I could change the "Display Name:" field to any 15-character and it would displayed on the incoming T-Mobile @Home system.
I was thinking about that last night at one point (while horizontal), but had forgotten about it by today when I made the post to which you replied. (Does that mean it was a dream ?)
On other occasions, I have wondered what purpose that this ATA field served.
And I think I remember Anveo specifying to enter Anveo into that field, but I believe I left my own name there from the last provider's settings.
Later on today, I will investigate the several possibilities and provide an update.
Thanks. |
|
DavesnothereNo-BHELL-ity DOES have its Advantages
join:2009-06-15
START&Cogeco
kudos:6
1 edit | said by Davesnothere:said by Davesnothere:So, should there be any way for me to determine for sure what is happening, possibly either from my Anveo portal call logs, or by fiddling with the NAME fields of my Callcentric portal 'address' page ? (mentioned in my 'Early Results' post)
said by DaveSin:It is possible the name information was passed from your PAP2T-NA (or whatever ATA or IP Phone that you are using) "Display Name:" field? Try playing with this field with different information to see what is displayed on incoming calls to your Anveo DID.
At one stage, I could change the "Display Name:" field to any 15-character and it would displayed on the incoming T-Mobile @Home system.
....I think I remember Anveo specifying to enter Anveo into that field, but I believe I left my own name there from the last provider's settings. Later on today, I will investigate the several possibilities and provide an update. Thanks.
UPDATE :
I have just performed the following tests :
(1) Changed the 'Display Name' field in the CallCentric channel of my ATA to something unique and placed a call from my CC number to my Anveo number.
Results : NO CHANGES to what I reported in the 2nd post of this thread.
quote:
[Incoming] from my CallCentric DID :
Number - the correct 11 digits, properly delimited with dashes
Name - Surname, followed by Given name, exactly as I had entered within the CallCentric web portal under Preferences>Address (unless I just now missed a more specific place in there where I had entered it for outbound CNAM), in MiXeD case - no truncation/abbreviation, as they total less than 15 characters including spaces
(2) Changed the 'Last Name' field in the CallCentric web portal Preferences>Address page to something further unique and placed a call from my CC number to my Anveo number.
Results : Still NO CHANGEs
(3) Waited a few minutes for my ATA to re-register (in case THAT might matter to any of my newest changes being passed as data) and placed one more call.
Results : Still NO CHANGES - proper last and first name appeared
So, the big $64,000 question : Is CallCentric doing more for us than they advertise ? |
|
DavesnothereNo-BHELL-ity DOES have its Advantages
join:2009-06-15
START&Cogeco
kudos:6
4 edits | Test of *67
I figured that if I could not make a difference in my immediate above tests, then what if I tried to block CID altogether ?
CallCentric's FAQ »www.callcentric.com/faq/31/221 describes this procedure.
So I entered *67 and waited for the 2nd dial tone, like I have done like forever on POTS lines.
Then I dialed the Anveo number.
MY FULL INFO APPEARED AS BEFORE !
Weird !
I hit the Redial and then Talk button.
This time I get another number, accompanied by Glendora CA.
It turns out that this is the number mentioned in the above CC FAQ.
After that, I dialed once again as above.
MY FULL INFO AGAIN APPEARED AS BEFORE !
Hmmmm....
Looks like *67 DOES block CID (and indirectly CNAM) on an outbound CallCentric call on a per-call basis.
BUT :
It also looks like you must NOT wait for a 2nd dial tone ! (even though it gives you one)
(Redialing just spews out a continuous string and THAT time, things went as the CC FAQ predicted.)
OLD HABITS ARE HARD TO BREAK !
I wonder whether or not CallCentric is aware of this behaviour of their service, and whether they could/would consider fixing it to match industry standard ?
= = = = = = = = = =
Next, I plan to examine my Anveo web portal incoming call log to search for clues. |
|
| Is the CC DID a number you ported in to CC? |
|
