dslreports logo
site
 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery
spc

spacer




how-to block ads


Search Topic:
uniqs
18830
share rss forum feed


grohgreg
Dunno. Ask The Chief

join:2001-07-05
Dawson Springs, KY
reply to Just For U

Re: HughesNet Old HN9000 System

said by Just For U :

Your a Satellite Salesman ..... Need I say more.

Probably would have been better to have said less. Anonymous cheap shots don't show much class. But you're clearly misinformed. Never sold a satellite in my life, I'm a retired telecommunications troubleshooter and satcom engineer. I've probably forgotten more about this stuff than you'll ever learn

//greg//
--
HN7000S - 98cm Prodelin/2w "pure" Osiris - ProPlus - G16/1001H - NOC:GTN - NAT 67.142.115.130 - Gateway 66.82.25.10 - DNS 66.82.4.12 and 66.82.4.8 - Firefox 15/MSIE9 - AV/Firewalled by NIS2012

peregrineman

join:2000-10-08
Wolf Creek, OR
reply to ricky_005

Re: Exede - Official Speed Posting Test Lounge -

Exede 12



Should be better


DrStrangLov

join:2012-03-28

said by peregrineman:

Exede 12
Should be better

Exede 5 around 11 PM CDT

Win7 verus Linux Mint 13 Maya

Note - Two different computers, but both computers have quad core CPUs.

Win7

:::.. Download Test Results ..:::
Download Connection:: 10253 Kbps or 10.3 Mbps
Download Test Size:: 12 MB or 12288 kB or 12582912 bytes
Download Speed:: 1282 kB/s or 1.3 MB/s
Tested At:: »TestMy.net version:12
Validation Link:: »testmy.net/db/XmdRpBL
Test Time:: 2012-09-05 23:06:15 Local Time

Linux Mint 13 Maya

:::.. Download Test Results ..:::
Download Connection:: 15080 Kbps or 15.1 Mbps
Download Test Size:: 13.6 MB or 13968 kB or 14303232 bytes
Download Speed:: 1885 kB/s or 1.9 MB/s
Tested At:: »TestMy.net version:12
Validation Link:: »testmy.net/db/FNaY5Rg
Test Time:: 2012-09-05 23:03:36 Local Time


Just For U

@direcway.com

Why do you always purposely delete all data below the time stamp from your download results?

Something maybe you don't want to revile to readers?

Based on your results you must only post results from your linux box as your Exede 5 windows results suck worse than my HughesNet HN9000 setup .... Most readers assume users are using a windows box unless you state otherwise.

MY TEST RESULTS ON A WINDOWS BOX

:::.. Download Test Results ..:::
Download Connection:: 17190 Kbps or 17.2 Mbps
Download Test Size:: 12 MB or 12288 kB or 12582912 bytes
Download Speed:: 2149 kB/s or 2.1 MB/s
Tested At:: »TestMy.net version:12
Validation Link:: »testmy.net/db/NP1mfQ7
Test Time:: 2012-09-01 01:01:58 Local Time
1MB Download in 0.48 Seconds - 1GB Download in ~8 Minutes - 307X faster than 56K
This test of exactly 12288 kB took 5.856 seconds to complete
Running at 567% of hosts average (Hughes Network Systems)
User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537

You notice I don't attempt to hide anything on my download results?



wm4bama

join:2012-05-10
Goodwater, AL
reply to Hard Truth

Re: HughesNet Old HN9000 System

I interrupted the wife on the desktop this morning long enough to run an upload test just to demonstrate that a wired connection is a little faster than a wireless...especially, like me, when the wireless laptop is near the edge of the wireless signal...probably looses some packets and has to re-transmit because of the weaker wireless signal..anyway, this is just a little above my upload speed average from the desktop...usually 2.4-2.6mbs, but illustrates my point:

:::.. Upload Test Results ..:::
Upload Connection:: 2823 Kbps or 2.8 Mbps
Upload Test Size:: 5.8 MB or 5983 kB or 6126840 bytes
Upload Speed:: 353 kB/s
Tested At:: »TestMy.net version:12
Validation Link:: »testmy.net/db/VQY3yXh
Test Time:: 2012-09-06 08:48:01 Local Time
1MB Upload in 2.9 Seconds - 1GB Upload in ~49 Minutes - 50X faster than 56K
This test of exactly 5983 kB took 17.363 seconds to complete
Running at 416% of hosts average (Wildblue Communications)
User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1) AppleWebKit/537.1 (KHTML,
--
Exede12, ViaSat-1, beam 342, Albuquerque Gateway, Denver AcceleNet servers


DrStrangLov

join:2012-03-28
reply to Just For U

Re: Exede - Official Speed Posting Test Lounge -

MY TEST RESULTS ON A WINDOWS BOX

:::.. Download Test Results ..:::

You notice I don't attempt to hide anything on my download results?

Actually, one is deceiving users when they don't understand that when Hughes server is playing "ping-pong" with Testmy's server; its not a realistic test.

The above photo, taken the other day, shows a "ping-pong" illusion, but I've never claimed Exede 5 can run this fast during DLs. There can be momentary spikes in speeds that exceed the value above, but these speeds can not be sustained for long.

Hence, an unrealistic test result

said by Just For U :

Why do you always purposely delete all data below the time stamp from your download results?

Removing clutter that has no relevance. What people should be looking at is the Validation Link. For instance, when users look at this Hughes Validation Link, »testmy.net/db/NP1mfQ7 , and then click on user's Connection ID, »testmy.net/compID/6157224633542 , they can see this Hughes user has taken all tests todate in the wee hours of the morning. And his test scores range from about 5 mbps to 17 mbps.

Something maybe you don't want to revile to readers?

When my Connection ID is clicked on, one can see testing has been done at many different time spots. Compared to your wee-hour testing, mine shows the readers a realistic overview of one user on a specific beam, WB-1: 163, using Exede 5 service; whereas yours is rather biased (wee hours only), and is not a realistic assessment of Hughes when a test represents a "ping-pong" score between Hughes server and Testmy's server.

silbaco
Premium
join:2009-08-03
USA
reply to ricky_005

Compression can also play a role in creating unrealistic speedtest results if speedtests use data that can be compressed. I know from experience that Opera Turbo can exaggerate download results by as much as 20% on testmy.net using slower DSL/cable connections compared to having Opera Turbo turned off.


DrStrangLov

join:2012-03-28

1 edit

Click for full size
said by silbaco:

I know from experience that Opera Turbo can exaggerate download results by as much as 20% on testmy.net using slower DSL/cable connections compared to having Opera Turbo turned off.

My tests have been via FireFox or WaterFox recently.

But, I do have Opera installed, with Turbo mode turned on. Notice that Opera "flat-lines" around 10 mbps via other users; hence, Turbo mode tops out around 10 mbps.

:::.. Download Test Results ..:::
Download Connection:: 9918 Kbps or 9.9 Mbps
Download Test Size:: 12 MB or 12288 kB or 12582912 bytes
Download Speed:: 1240 kB/s or 1.2 MB/s
Tested At:: »TestMy.net version:12
Validation Link:: »testmy.net/db/0eOaGRr
Test Time:: 2012-09-06 13:28:10 Local Time
1MB Download in 0.83 Seconds - 1GB Download in ~14 Minutes - 177X faster than 56K
This test of exactly 12288 kB took 10.15 seconds to complete
Running at 120% of hosts average (Opera Software ASA)
User Agent:: Opera/9.80 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; U; en) Presto/2.10.289 Version/

Footnote - Look at Connection ID, »testmy.net/compID/129390883

Off hand, it looks like my score was the highest there.


Just For U

@direcway.com
reply to DrStrangLov

We are all playing Ping Pong using the same test, and the fact of the matter is I beat your Exede 5 at playing Ping Pong on HughesNet HN9000 system at 1.5Mbps! I can keep up with most all Exede 12 Systems also.

Spin it all you want ...... Facts are Facts ...... it has been written on the wall.

So to sum all of this up for everyone. If all test are performed on the same test site ...... we are all playing ping pong together its just a matter of which browser your using!

So many irreverent/spin answers.


DrStrangLov

join:2012-03-28

said by Just For U :

We are all playing Ping Pong using the same test, and the fact of the matter is

Ricky has posted here under the name of "Just For U"

"Just For U's" Testmy post above has the same Testmy Connection ID (6157224633542) as Ricky's post over at DSL's Hughes forum: »[HN9000] Comparison Test - HughesNet 1.5/256 | Versus | Exede 12

»testmy.net/compID/6157224633542

As noted already in a previous post in this thread:

PS: Ricky, your post may be off topic here, as you indicated in first post:

"The purpose of this speed test lounge is to log and consolidate Exede 5 and 12 user Speed Test. By posting your speed test here, users will have a better idea of how well Exede's network is performing and what to Expect from Exede Satellite Internet Service."


grohgreg
Dunno. Ask The Chief

join:2001-07-05
Dawson Springs, KY

said by DrStrangLov:

Ricky has posted here under the name of "Just For U"

Probably more. Over in the Hughes forum he's using (at least) "Ricky_005" and "King". Don't think the boy thinks we've seen that trick before.

//greg//
--
HN7000S - 98cm Prodelin/2w "pure" Osiris - ProPlus - G16/1001H - NOC:GTN - NAT 67.142.115.130 - Gateway 66.82.25.10 - DNS 66.82.4.12 and 66.82.4.8 - Firefox 15/MSIE9 - AV/Firewalled by NIS2012

zeddlar

join:2007-04-09
Jay, OK
Reviews:
·exede by ViaSat
·McDonald County ..
reply to Just For U

Notice there is nothing there but garbage?? Not any usefull info unless maybe you are thinking he wasn't testing his exede service but some other ISP which really doesn't make a whole lot of sense. Maybe he was just cutting back on the clutter. I cut all that off as well for that very reason unless someone has a question as to my ISP.
--
HughesNet elite plan/.74 dish w/1watt trans. / 9000 modem / 3 computers on a linksy's wired network


phillipmc

join:2011-03-11
Knoxville, IA
reply to ricky_005

---------------------
Exede Plan: " 12Mbit 25GB/monthly "
State: " IA "
Beam No: " 309 "
---------------------

:::.. Download Test Results ..:::
Download Connection:: 18652 Kbps or 18.7 Mbps
Download Test Size:: 12 MB or 12288 kB or 12582912 bytes
Download Speed:: 2331 kB/s or 2.3 MB/s
Tested At:: »TestMy.net version:13
Validation Link:: »testmy.net/db/WCKjXr1
Test Time:: 2012-09-17 10:28:42 Local Time
1MB Download in 0.44 Seconds - 1GB Download in ~8 Minutes - 333X faster than 56K
This test of exactly 12288 kB took 5.397 seconds to complete
Running at 154% of hosts average (Wildblue Communications)

:::.. Upload Test Results ..:::
Upload Connection:: 3815 Kbps or 3.8 Mbps
Upload Test Size:: 5.8 MB or 5983 kB or 6126840 bytes
Upload Speed:: 477 kB/s
Tested At:: »TestMy.net version:13
Validation Link:: »testmy.net/db/EHIzsqh
Test Time:: 2012-09-17 10:30:40 Local Time
1MB Upload in 2.15 Seconds - 1GB Upload in ~37 Minutes - 68X faster than 56K
This test of exactly 5983 kB took 12.847 seconds to complete
Running at 399% of hosts average (Wildblue Communications)


Name141

join:2006-09-02
reply to ricky_005

Looks like it IS time to upgrade..

HN7000S

:::.. Download Speed Test Results ..:::
Download Connection Speed:: 418 Kbps or 0.4 Mbps
Download Speed Test Size:: 1.5 MB or 1536 kB or 1572864 bytes
Download Binary File Transfer Speed:: 52 kB/s
Tested At:: »TestMy.net Version 13
Validation:: »testmy.net/db/yp7xZTj
More Stats:: »testmy.net/compID/615722116397
Test Time:: 2012-10-01 18:06:12 Local Time
1MB Download in 19.69 Seconds - 1GB Download in ~6 Hours - 7X faster than 56K
This test of exactly 1536 kB took 30.078 seconds to complete
Running at 8% of hosts average (Hughes Network Systems)
User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:15.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/15.0.1 [!]

Just not sure about the 7.5 GB.. I mean 12-5 AM being open would be awesome on a connection 12 Mbps connection. It took me 8 days to download LA Noire Full (13.3 GBs) from 1-6 AM on hughesnet.