OS and Software > All Things Macintosh > Apple v Samsung verdict in-coming

Apple v Samsung verdict in-coming

reply to Goober
All this is really doing is setting up who the plaintiff will be in the appeal.

Yup.

reply to Goober
Looks like a Samsung beat-down regarding infringement. Interesting to see what the damages will be. The jury came back so fast, it's got to be high.
--
I've heard, and I don't know if it's true, that Harry Reid takes it up the kiester from farm animals.

reply to mromero

Taking so long?

reply to mromero
On the first claim, regarding the '301 "bounce back" patent, the jury finds Samsung guilty on all counts. Samsung infringed on Apple's patent on a wide variety of products.

On Apple's "pinch and zoom" '915 patent, the jury found that Samsung infringed on all but three products.

For the "double-tap to zoom" '163 patent, the jury found that Samsung infringed on a wide number of products, but not all.

»www.macrumors.com/2012/08/24/jur···g-trial/

reply to Goober
Willful infringement. Possible treble damages.

reply to mromero
»twitter.com/reckless

Nilay Patel Former Copyright Attorney, now works for The Verge, twitter feed comments

reply to Goober
Damages $1B+

reply to Goober
$1 billion+.

Wow!

reply to mromero
Jury awards Apple $1,051,855,000 in Samsung patent dispute ruling Holy Shit

reply to Goober
Samsung's losing all its counterclaims.

reply to Goober

Today Apple closed at $663.22, after hours high at 7:05 was $673.20.

--
August is National Eye Exam Month

reply to Goober
And AAPL is taking off in after hours.

reply to Goober
Phew, thank God for that. I was worried Apple might go under. They could sure use that $1B.

/sarcasm

Yes, I understand this about IP protection, not cash before all the Apple zealots put me in the stocks.
--
My Gallery
Formerly Nezmo

reply to Thinkdiff
How many outstanding shares does Apple have?