5 recommendations |
chachazz
Premium Member
2012-Sep-6 6:57 pm
[Updated] [Free] JavaRa 2.0 Stable releasedJavaRa 2.0 is now available.by Shane Gowland - Sept 6, 2012quote:
We’re also releasing new JavaRa Definitions, which adds removal support for JRE 1.7.0.7.
Changes since last JavaRa beta:
• Improved detection of JRE native uninstallers.
• Fixed issue that caused settings to be ignored.
• Added file and directory removal support to definition file format
• Updated Brazillian translation
• Added French translation (incomplete)
• Added option to automatically check for program updates
JavaRa 1.16 will remain available and continue receiving updates until (at least) 2014.
More info & download: » singularlabs.com/softwar ··· /javara/
|
|
 Dustyn
Premium Member
join:2003-02-26
Ontario, CAN
1 recommendation |
Dustyn
Premium Member
2012-Sep-6 7:07 pm
Looks nice!  |
|
 CCatWe're all quite mad here
MVM
join:2005-12-06
Wonderland
1 recommendation |
to chachazz
Updated...Thanks |
|
 PentangleWith our thoughts we make the world.
Premium Member
join:2006-06-01
Vancouver BC
1 recommendation |
to chachazz
Thanks chazzy. |
|
 jabarnutLight Years Away
Premium Member
join:2005-01-22
Galaxy M31
1 recommendation |
to chachazz
Thank you, chazz! |
|
 BuddelIf it ain't broke, don't fix it.
Premium Member
join:2004-03-06
EU
1 recommendation |
to chachazz
Got it. Thank you. |
|
| |
to chachazz
For such a simple and great utility to need .NET Framework is truly disappointing. |
|
jabarnutLight Years Away
Premium Member
join:2005-01-22
Galaxy M31
1 recommendation |
jabarnut
Premium Member
2012-Sep-7 12:36 pm
Yeah, I noticed that too. But I really like the new interface, and I've got a few other apps that require .NET Framework. (Can't remember specifically right off the bat which ones, but I've got the required .NET none the less). Haven't tried this out yet..waiting for the Java guys to get their act together first.  |
|
 Littlem129
Premium Member
join:2007-05-13
White Pine, TN
1 recommendation |
to chachazz
Thanks chachazz  ! |
|
 MarkAWBarry White
Premium Member
join:2001-08-27
Canada
1 recommendation |
to chachazz
Thanks chazzy. |
|
 trparky
Premium Member
join:2000-05-24
Cleveland, OH ·AT&T U-Verse
|
trparky
Premium Member
2012-Sep-10 9:08 am
A lot of developers are going with .NET because of the ease of development with it. It can do a lot of the hard stuff for you while you concentrate on what you need your program to do.
It looks like the program may be written in VB.NET. Nothing wrong with VB.NET, it's not your father's BASIC. |
|
| |
It has more to do with .NET applications whether they be in VB or straight up .NET take up more memory/resources than ones without from what I've seen.
Plus .NET is one more security vulnerability to concern one's self with in the end. |
|
trparky
Premium Member
join:2000-05-24
Cleveland, OH ·AT&T U-Verse
2 recommendations |
trparky
Premium Member
2012-Sep-10 9:01 pm
said by kickass69:It has more to do with .NET applications whether they be in VB or straight up .NET take up more memory/resources than ones without from what I've seen. What do you want for RAD (Rapid Application Development)? said by kickass69:Plus .NET is one more security vulnerability to concern one's self with in the end. That could be said for anything. C++ in the wrong hands can be downright dangerous! |
|
·