Fort Erie, ON
reply to dillyhammer
Re: [Niagara] 40gb of "usage" while the modem is unplu
said by dillyhammer:I believe it only becomes an issue if those two macs are on the same node.
Frankly, I don't think it was a cloned MAC address. Two interfaces with the same MAC on the same network? All hell would break loose. Cogeco would know about that in a heartbeat.
dillyhammerA. Good. Start.Premium,MVMReviews:
said by Gone:Yes apparently so.
I believe it only becomes an issue if those two macs are on the same node.
And according to Cogeco a CMTS polls cable modems for usage information.
I'm trying to understand how a CMTS polls a modem with a MAC address, and then polls a different modem with the same MAC address on a different node, then reconciles those 2 distinct usage reports to one user's bill.
Or conversely, a CMTS polls a modem with a MAC address, a different CMTS polls a different modem on a different node with the same MAC address, how would those two usage reports from two different CMTS's, two different nodes, two different modems with the same MAC address be reconciled to one user's bill.
Cogeco - The New UBB Devil -»[Burloak] Usage Based Billing Nightmare
Make The Switch - »openmedia.ca/switch
Fort Erie, ON
The data is most likely combined. A MAC is a MAC. There's no way to identify the modem beyond that.