 Teddy Boomk kudos Received join:2007-01-29 Toronto, ON kudos:5 | reply to mlord
Re: Upgrading Firmware on Thompson DCM475 said by mlord:it should still take less than 10 minutes to move 4MBytes over that serial link. Some cable modems have 16MByte flash! -- electronicsguru.ca/for_sale/Cablemodems |
|
 mlord join:2006-11-05 Nepean, ON kudos:9 Reviews:
·Start Communicat..
·TekSavvy Cable
·TekSavvy DSL
| I've now broken down and ordered an Arduino Pro Micro 3.3V board for this project. It should be here on Wednesday, and ought to simplify things: faster comms, and no need for level shifting.
Still looking for a cheaper source for the clip-on connector ($12 shipping for a $12 part??).
Cheers |
|
 mlord join:2006-11-05 Nepean, ON kudos:9 Reviews:
·Start Communicat..
·TekSavvy Cable
·TekSavvy DSL
| Update: things are moving along.
Got the 3.3V Arduino board today -- have to get it running soon. Also have all of the code written and tested (with logic analyzer) for dumping / programming flash on the Arduino.
Haven't found a more affordable source for the (excellent) recommended test clips, but just noticed that the EZ-Hook clips from the analyzer work very well on the in-circuit flash chip. So I'll just use those, since I've got lots of them on hand.
So I'm pretty close to hook-up time. Once I get the new 'duino going, the first task is to rip the 02.08 firmware a few times via different sequences, and do binary compares to judge the reliability of the communications. Then try erasing and reprogramming just the 02.08 firmware, and do readback/verify again.
If that all works, I'll get hold of the 02.16 modem and snatch a copy of the latest firmware from it.
Cheers |
|
|
|
 Teddy Boomk kudos Received join:2007-01-29 Toronto, ON kudos:5 | said by mlord:So I'm pretty close to hook-up time. Once I get the new 'duino going, the first task is to rip the 02.08 firmware a few times via different sequences, and do binary compares to judge the reliability of the communications. Then try erasing and reprogramming just the 02.08 firmware, and do readback/verify again.
If that all works, I'll get hold of the 02.16 modem and snatch a copy of the latest firmware from it. Install the USBJTAG software and take a look at how cable modem flash is organized on other modems, it will help a lot. If you need a flash dump from a modem, I can pass that along..
In particular, what you'll find is that some of the firmware will be human readable. Try searching for "DCM" and "docsis" in a hex editor. If you've read the firmware properly you should find strings like that. When my friend read a DCM425 chip for me, the bytes always came out flipped:If I load 425-1.bin into USBJTAG and then inspect image0 I see the string as follows: CD4M525-.2803.-1118032S-.Sib.n
Flip the bits and I get: DCM425-52.08.31-110823-SS.bin.
So maybe it is all just pairwise swapped?!?!  So I googled around a bit and found HEX Workshop, which conveniently has a byte swap feature. Not long after that I had a working ST52.08.31 image. »www.hexworkshop.com/
Unfortunately no Sayal in Ottawa: »www.sayal.com/zinc/zinc_contactus.asp But there must be an electronics supply place.. Not sure about test clips, but they aren't that obscure, so the odds can't be too bad. -- electronicsguru.ca/for_sale/Cablemodems |
|
 TSI GabePremium,VIP join:2007-01-03 Chatham, ON kudos:2 | That's called Endianness
»en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Endianness
x86 are little endian
While in this case is likely MIPS based which is usually big endian. -- TSI Gabe - TekSavvy Solutions Inc. Authorized TSI employee ( »TekSavvy FAQ »Official support in the forum )
|
|
 Teddy Boomk kudos Received join:2007-01-29 Toronto, ON kudos:5 | said by TSI Gabe:That's called Endianness Thanks! I've heard of little endian and big endian before, and I probably even dealt with the ideas a little 15 years ago, but I sure didn't make the connection.
I mentioned that I'm an analog guy right?  -- electronicsguru.ca/for_sale/Cablemodems |
|
 mlord join:2006-11-05 Nepean, ON kudos:9 Reviews:
·Start Communicat..
·TekSavvy Cable
·TekSavvy DSL
1 edit | reply to mlord
 The test setup.. forgot to disconnect the Logic Analyzer |
Unfortunately the new 3.3V Arduino w/USB died after just a minute or so of use. So for now, I'm back to the serial port version at 5V. Turns out level shifting is a non=issue. I was all set to do it, but just hooked things up without it for a trial, and it all works!
Dumping 32mbits of flash now.  ... 00009f50 00 6a 00 69 00 0a 50 70 61 6e 00 01 00 01 00 08 |.j.i..Ppan......| 00009f60 6d 46 57 4c 00 01 00 08 52 53 54 4c 00 01 00 19 |mFWL....RSTL....| 00009f70 54 48 4f 4d 00 01 00 00 07 44 43 4d 34 37 35 00 |THOM.....DCM475.| 00009f80 00 04 31 2e 30 00 00 00 4c 52 43 41 20 00 03 00 |..1.0...LRCA ...| 00009f90 00 00 00 44 43 4d 34 37 35 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 |...DCM475.......| 00009fa0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 |................| ...
More later, whenever it finishes (hours, likely). |
|
 Teddy Boomk kudos Received join:2007-01-29 Toronto, ON kudos:5 | said by mlord:Unfortunately the new 3.3V Arduino w/USB died after just a minute or so of use.
So for now, I'm back to the serial port version at 5V. Turns out level shifting is a non=issue. Interesting... I think maybe the 3.3V got over loaded because of other loads on the modem board. Maybe the 5V Arduino is more robust--outputs more current. It takes around 0.5A from my bench supply when I apply power direct to the chip in circuit, some modems close to 1A.
5V is on the edge really.. If it is really 4.8V, then I'm sure it is pretty safe (though I'd like to keep it 4V and lower normally). If it is really 5.5V I think you are risking the modem..
said by mlord:... 00009f50 00 6a 00 69 00 0a 50 70 61 6e 00 01 00 01 00 08 |.j.i..Ppan......| 00009f60 6d 46 57 4c 00 01 00 08 52 53 54 4c 00 01 00 19 |mFWL....RSTL....| 00009f70 54 48 4f 4d 00 01 00 00 07 44 43 4d 34 37 35 00 |THOM.....DCM475.| 00009f80 00 04 31 2e 30 00 00 00 4c 52 43 41 20 00 03 00 |..1.0...LRCA ...| 00009f90 00 00 00 44 43 4d 34 37 35 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 |...DCM475.......| 00009fa0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 |................| ...
More later, whenever it finishes (hours, likely). Looking good  -- electronicsguru.ca/for_sale/Cablemodems |
|
 mlord join:2006-11-05 Nepean, ON kudos:9 Reviews:
·Start Communicat..
·TekSavvy Cable
·TekSavvy DSL
| reply to mlord
 SPI activity |
Well, that wasn't so bad. I've now got an exactly 4 MByte file with a binary dump of the entire flash chip inside. Oddly enough, none of the flash is write-protected either, according to the chip status register.
I'm going to dump it a few more times and check for bit errors between the various dumps. Meanwhile, here's a look at the logic analyzer display during the dumping.. |
|
 mlord join:2006-11-05 Nepean, ON kudos:9 Reviews:
·Start Communicat..
·TekSavvy Cable
·TekSavvy DSL
3 edits | reply to Teddy Boom said by Teddy Boom:said by mlord:Unfortunately the new 3.3V Arduino w/USB died after just a minute or so of use. So for now, I'm back to the serial port version at 5V. Turns out level shifting is a non=issue. Interesting... I think maybe the 3.3V got over loaded because of other loads on the modem board. No, it died before ever being connected to anything other than my PC's USB port. A not uncommon issue, apparently. I'm checking to see if I can get it replaced under warranty.
quote: 5V is on the edge really.. If it is really 4.8V, then I'm sure it is pretty safe (though I'd like to keep it 4V and lower normally). If it is really 5.5V I think you are risking the modem..
I'm powering the flash chip with 3V, but feeding it TTL signal levels for the SPI lines. A paper I read earlier suggests this is kosher, and thus far it seems to be. The only real concern was whether the MISO data line from the flash chip would have a high enough logic "1" voltage to work with the Arduino. Correction: I did keep the level conversion for MSIO after all. So just that one line (data-out from the flash chip) gets up-shifted to 5V logic.
Cheers |
|
 mlord join:2006-11-05 Nepean, ON kudos:9 Reviews:
·Start Communicat..
·TekSavvy Cable
·TekSavvy DSL
| Mmm.. interesting. You know how these modems always chop off the log messages displayed in the web interface? Well.. the full log messages (not chopped) are stored near the end of flash.  |
|
 TSI GabePremium,VIP join:2007-01-03 Chatham, ON kudos:2 | I've been meaning to get one of these for a while.
»www.adafruit.com/products/757
Conversion from 3.3 to 5v or the other way around is way too common. -- TSI Gabe - TekSavvy Solutions Inc. Authorized TSI employee ( »TekSavvy FAQ »Official support in the forum )
|
|
 mlord join:2006-11-05 Nepean, ON kudos:9 Reviews:
·Start Communicat..
·TekSavvy Cable
·TekSavvy DSL
1 edit | Yeah, that's the same type of gizmo I'm using here, except mine is from SparkFun: »www.sparkfun.com/products/8745 Edit: But I like the one you posted the link for even better. Gotta get some!
Handy little sucker. I'm actually using the "LV" (Low Voltage) side to POWER the flash chip in-circuit inside the modem. Works rather well!
After disconnecting the logic analyzer, the loading on the pins is now low enough that I'm getting very consistent error-free dumps every time. Takes just under 19 minutes to dump all of flash in ASCII-hex (with spaces) over the serial link. I can speed that up by eliminating the spaces between byte values, which ought reduce the time by 1/3 or so.
At this point, I'm just about ready to borrow a modem with 02.16 firmware to read the image out of.
Cheers |
|
 mlord join:2006-11-05 Nepean, ON kudos:9 Reviews:
·Start Communicat..
·TekSavvy Cable
·TekSavvy DSL
| reply to mlord said by mlord:Unfortunately the new 3.3V Arduino w/USB died after just a minute or so of use. After some research, it turns out it wasn't dead after all -- just getting stuck somewhere. I've revived it now, and the setup is much simpler using it, with built-in USB and 3V logic. Just six(6) wires from it to clips on the flash chip, and nothing else required. 
After I re-rip the flash a few times, I'll start playing with the scarier business of erasing/programming the flash and see how that turns out.
Very, very, close now! |
|
 mlord join:2006-11-05 Nepean, ON kudos:9 Reviews:
·Start Communicat..
·TekSavvy Cable
·TekSavvy DSL
| Six minutes and thirty-seven seconds to rip and transfer the 4MBytes of flash, using a 1Mhz SPI clock. That's good, I suppose. Programming will be slower.
Speaking of which, I can't just shove the entire image from another modem into this one, or can I? Surely there's an area in flash that records the MAC addresses for the modem? I do see the MAC address in several places, in both binary and formatted ASCII.
Teddy Boom? |
|
 mlord join:2006-11-05 Nepean, ON kudos:9 Reviews:
·Start Communicat..
·TekSavvy Cable
·TekSavvy DSL
1 edit | Okay, there are several distinct regions within the 4MBytes of flash.
The first 64KB appears to be a fixed "bootloader" area, including MAC address and various crypto certificates.
The area from 0x010000 to 0x1fffff (2MB less 64KB in size) is likely the "factory image" area. This consists of a firmware code image, plus padding. The odd thing is, there's a bunch of "junk" in the first few 64KB blocks following the "used portion" of the image here, possibly leftovers from an earlier/larger "manufacturing/test image" at the factory. The "regular" image padding appears to be 16KB blocks of 0xffffffff, except with the first 32-bits of each 16KB block zeroed out 0x00000000.
The area from 0x200000 to 0x3effff (same size as above) looks like the "secondary image" area, used for new firmware downloads in the field. The suspicion is that if a valid image is found here, then the booloader uses it rather than the "factory" image. Currently on my modem, it's a duplicate of the factory image, minus the "junk", with "regular" padding as described above.
It's not clear if field upgrades alternate between the two images, or always go only to the second image. I can probably find out with some experimentation once I have the 02.16 image to play with alongside the 02.08 image.
The final 64KB of flash is mainly used as a set (two sets?) of log buffers.
Since none of the flash has been write-protected, it's easy to do all kinds of experimentation without having to lift the WE (Write Enable) pin. 
Time to start erasing/programming things now. |
|
 | Is Rogers the only company refusing to upgrade firmware? How about Videotron? Are they holding the same deplorable attitude and practice? |
|
 mlord join:2006-11-05 Nepean, ON kudos:9 | Dunno. But for most modems, we can now do it ourselves, or take/send it to Toronto to have it done. I'll be offering updates to DCM-475 modems here in Ottawa shortly.
Cheers |
|
 GonePremium join:2011-01-24 Fort Erie, ON kudos:3 Reviews:
·Start Communicat..
| reply to vientito1 said by vientito1:Is Rogers the only company refusing to upgrade firmware? How about Videotron? Are they holding the same deplorable attitude and practice? For what it's worth, Cogeco will update the firmware of any supported modem connected to its network, regardless of who owns it. |
|
 | Please give out sites where we could find info about DIY flashing of most brands we find on market. I have googled but failed to get any useful info so far. |
|