 | Which SSD drive to get? My system is Core i7, P8Z68-V PRO mobo, 8 gigs RAM, HD 6970 2GB video card
I want a ~250 gig SSD drive as my main drive where OS will be installed, instead of my current SATA drive.
Which ~250 GB SSD would you recommend withing $300 range (at very most)? -- God is a superstition. Religion is poison. |
|
 KoRnGtL15Premium join:2007-01-04 Grants Pass, OR | Cant go wrong with the latest series from Intel or Crucial. I personally would go with Intel. |
|
|
|
 | said by KoRnGtL15:Cant go wrong with the latest series from Intel or Crucial. I personally would go with Intel. Someone told me to get a Kingston because they are well reviewed and unlike Intel, Kingston specializes in hard drives, while Intel does not -- God is a superstition. Religion is poison. |
|
 KoRnGtL15Premium join:2007-01-04 Grants Pass, OR | What? Intel is king in the ssd division for reliability. |
|
 JoelC707Premium join:2002-07-09 West Point, GA kudos:5 | reply to 59137280 Intel is actually one of the top brands as far as SSD reliability and you do pay for that too. OCZ is also a good one, especially their Vertex 3 line.
For what it's worth, Kingston doesn't specialize in drives, they specialize in memory chips. And by that same logic so does Crucial  |
|
 OctaveanPremium,MVM join:2001-03-31 New York, NY kudos:1 | reply to 59137280 There was a 512GB OCZ Vertex 4 going for ~$300 on Newegg not too long ago. I was very tempted at that price,
. |
|
 DKSDamn Kidney StonesPremium,ExMod 2002 join:2001-03-22 Owen Sound, ON kudos:2 Reviews:
·Bell Sympatico
| reply to KoRnGtL15 said by KoRnGtL15:Cant go wrong with the latest series from Intel or Crucial. I personally would go with Intel. I agree. -- Need-based health care not greed-based health care. |
|
 KrisnatharokCaveat EmptorPremium join:2009-02-11 Earth Orbit kudos:7 | reply to 59137280 said by 59137280:said by KoRnGtL15:Cant go wrong with the latest series from Intel or Crucial. I personally would go with Intel. Someone told me to get a Kingston because they are well reviewed and unlike Intel, Kingston specializes in hard drives, while Intel does not "Someone" is wrong. Intel owns reliability in SSDs... -- If we lose this freedom of ours, history will record with the greatest astonishment, those who had the most to lose, did the least to prevent its happening. |
|
 OctaveanPremium,MVM join:2001-03-31 New York, NY kudos:1 | reply to 59137280 When it comes to reliability, I think of Intel, Crucial and Samsung.
I think some early Kingston SSD models were just rebranded Intel SSD units, maybe that is where the confusion is coming from,.....
Not to say that Kingston SSD units are bad or anything,..... |
|
 | reply to 59137280
|
|
 KrisnatharokCaveat EmptorPremium join:2009-02-11 Earth Orbit kudos:7 | Instead of the Vertex 3, I'd get the Vertex 4: »www.newegg.ca/Product/Product.as···20227792
It's faster, takes less power, has a longer warranty (5 v 3 yrs), includes the 3.5" adapter, and uses OCZ's proprietary Indilinx controller instead of the third-party Sandforce in the Vertex 3. It's only $10-15 more than the Crucial/Kingston you are considering. -- If we lose this freedom of ours, history will record with the greatest astonishment, those who had the most to lose, did the least to prevent its happening. |
|
 OctaveanPremium,MVM join:2001-03-31 New York, NY kudos:1 | reply to 59137280 Ill just say that I have a number of OCZ SSD units. Not one of them has given me even a nanosecond worth problems (yet). Still there have been quite a few reports of problems which is why I hesitated on the 512GB Vertex 4 for under ~$300. Im kind of kicking myself for that as I think it was worth the risk and well worth the price.
Anyway, to the OP, I have a Crucial M4 256GB SSD. I think they are great and reliable as well. I think you can probably do better on the price though. |
|
 | reply to Krisnatharok said by Krisnatharok:Instead of the Vertex 3, I'd get the Vertex 4: »www.newegg.ca/Product/Product.as···20227792
It's faster, takes less power, has a longer warranty (5 v 3 yrs), includes the 3.5" adapter, and uses OCZ's proprietary Indilinx controller instead of the third-party Sandforce in the Vertex 3. It's only $10-15 more than the Crucial/Kingston you are considering. Good advice! Will probably do just this! -- God is a superstition. Religion is poison. |
|
 OctaveanPremium,MVM join:2001-03-31 New York, NY kudos:1 | reply to 59137280
What about this though:
»www.newegg.com/Product/Product.a···20239046
***edit***
Oh I see your link was to Newegg.ca, not sure if the coupon code will work for you there but I guess you could give it a try. |
|
 | Well, it seems cheaper... I'd rather a better quality one -- God is a superstition. Religion is poison. |
|
 | reply to Octavean Ok, the initial price is the same as Vertex 4, but the coupon doesn't work in Canada -- God is a superstition. Religion is poison. |
|
 OctaveanPremium,MVM join:2001-03-31 New York, NY kudos:1 | reply to 59137280 said by 59137280:Well, it seems cheaper... I'd rather a better quality one Then I would suggest Intel:
»www.newegg.ca/Product/Product.as···20167127
The Crucial M4 you already linked to or Samsung which I cant seem to find anywhere on Newegg.ca (plenty on Newegg.com though).
Im not saying OCZ is to be avoided since I have a number of OCZ SSD units that work fine its just the user reviews are often polarized at about ~50 : 50. I typically like to see a higher satisfaction rate then that. OCZ isnt known for reliability and that seems to be what you want. Therefore, I wouldnt even recommend the newest Vertex 4. |
|
 KoRnGtL15Premium join:2007-01-04 Grants Pass, OR | reply to 59137280 OCZ is absolutely horrible. Do not even think or consider them if you want reliability. Samsung is also excellent. |
|
 | reply to 59137280 Ordered the Vertex 4 |
|
 KrisnatharokCaveat EmptorPremium join:2009-02-11 Earth Orbit kudos:7 | reply to KoRnGtL15 said by KoRnGtL15:OCZ is absolutely horrible. My personal experience contradicts your opinion. |
|