republican-creole
site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
view:
normal
Posting?
Post a:
Post a:
Links: ·TekSavvy DSL Reviews ·TekSavvy Forum FAQ ·Speedtest results
AuthorAll Replies


Mersault

join:2007-10-26
Toronto, ON

reply to TSI Gabe

Re: IPv6 beta

More from the ICSI Netalyzer: "The path between your network and our system supports an MTU of at least 1500 bytes, and the path between our system and your network has an MTU of 1486 bytes. The bottleneck is at IP address 206.248.154.101."

Looks like an MTU of 1500 is possible with MLPPP. Which should be reasonable if we're splitting and reassembling the packets at the PPP layer. Now of course, this is only true if we're actually running two full PPP tunnels, and not the "single link MLPPP" thing that some people use to defeat the Bell DPI systems.


TSI Gabe
Premium,VIP
join:2007-01-03
Chatham, ON
kudos:2

Ok so let me start this over

Single Non-MLPPP Line = MTU of 1492
Single MLPPP Line = MTU of 1486
Multiple MLPPP line (assuming you are splitting your packets properly both ways) = MTU of 1500
--
TSI Gabe - TekSavvy Solutions Inc.
Authorized TSI employee ( »TekSavvy FAQ »Official support in the forum )


ggqc007

join:2012-02-23
Canada

Any plans to give us rdns control on our block??

Ty!


Monday, 20-May 00:21:49 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 13.5 years online © 1999-2013 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics