| Retirement It's time for more people to start paying into their own retirement. Don't wanna pay in, then keep working all your life. It's not the company's job to make sure you keep having income after you leave and retire.
And as far as killing off the wireline side of the company, will still take years to happen, but should have happened a LONG time ago. Spin VZ's assets off on its own and change the name, allow the CellCo company to retain the VZ brand and be done with it. |
|
Reviews:
 ·Verizon FiOS
2 edits | Wow, youre back with your all-mighty wisdom, AGAIN. If you were at a job that had a pension, you wouldnt have such ridiculous opinions. When youre coming out of college, and you weigh your options, the benefits are analyzed. If a company offers a pension, and vacation, and sicktime, and a good wage, you GO FOR THAT JOB.
Just because you dont have something, doesnt mean nobody else should. I thought you retired this screen name?
And by the way, it will really ruffle your feathers to know that VZ Union employees not only get a pension, but have a 401K as well. Yea, maybe you shouldve filled out a NYNEX, Bell Atlantic, GTE, or Verizon application years ago.
I'll never understand why people are so concerned with dragging down everyone else instead of raising themselves up, its really sad. |
|
 RobIn Deo speramus.Premium
join:2001-08-25
Kendall, FL
kudos:3 | reply to hottboiinnc
said by hottboiinnc:It's time for more people to start paying into their own retirement. Don't wanna pay in, then keep working all your life. It's not the company's job to make sure you keep having income after you leave and retire.
And people would have no problem paying into their own retirement if they would receive raises and other adjustments to cost of living on a regular basis, especially when these companies are bringing in billions of dollars.
--
CheckSite.us | YourIP.us | Reverseip.us |
|
 r81984Fair and BalancedPremium
join:2001-11-14
Katy, TX
 ·row44
·AT&T U-Verse
 ·AT&T DSL Service
| reply to ITALIAN926
said by ITALIAN926:Wow, youre back with your all-mighty wisdom, AGAIN. If you were at a job that had a pension, you wouldnt have such ridiculous opinions. When youre coming out of college, and you weigh your options, the benefits are analyzed. If a company offers a pension, and vacation, and sicktime, and a good wage, you GO FOR THAT JOB.
Just because you dont have something, doesnt mean nobody else should. I thought you retired this screen name?
And by the way, it will really ruffle your feathers to know that VZ Union employees not only get a pension, but have a 401K as well. Yea, maybe you shouldve filled out a NYNEX, Bell Atlantic, GTE, or Verizon application years ago.
I'll never understand why people are so concerned with dragging down everyone else instead of raising themselves up, its really sad.
All I could find was 2007 data.
80% government workers get pensions
21% private workers get pensions
Pensions are rare in the private industry as they are not sustainable. A company cannot afford to have pensions unless they are a monopoly on something we all need so they can keep increasing their prices.
Capitalism prevents pensions from working as a new company can come along and under cut the prices of a company that have 20,000 people retired on their pensions plan.
The private sector pensions will not last. The landline phone business will be over in the next 10 years, so anyone not retired by then and those still on retirement before then will lose their pensions. They are stupid if they actually think they will get one.
How can you expect a company to afford to pay for workers who no longer work for them? Workers who make them no money at all?
--
...brought to you by Carl's Jr. |
|
| reply to ITALIAN926
Because that's what America is now. Enjoy the decline as the rich get richer!
We all must sacrifice for them. It's so hard being rich these days.
Did you ever read in your history book about the roaring 20's? We're going to soon take a trip back, and live it for ourselves. |
|
Reviews:
·Verizon FiOS
| reply to r81984
You dont LOSE pensions working for a company that makes 10 BILLION dollars a year in profit.
Even if the union employees "lost" their current pensions, as you constantly seem to hope for, they are NOT LOST, they are FROZEN. Dont you think theres some kind of laws to protect workers in that situation?.
I work for a company 30 years, expecting a pension to retire, then the company says " nah we changed our minds, you have nothing" Wake up bud. |
|
| reply to r81984
That assumes that prior Verizon management(Baby Bell side and GTE side) made no future plans when they were a monopoly. I would be curious to see how much they currently have for assets in their pension plan. |
|
| reply to ITALIAN926
you do! Look at GM. They paid ALL of those people's retirment for YEARS and still do only to go bankrupt with no money. the USPS is the same- a public/private company yet going bankrput thanks to the retirement BS. these people should be REQUIRED to pay into their retirement and save just like everyone else. Just because you're union does NOT give you the right to demand this. They should strike again and VZ should LOCK them ALL OUT. VZ needs to attend BCI's Class of Union Mgt. |
|
| reply to Rob
Regardless it is NOT the company's problem to pay into it. I worked for a multi-billion dollar toy company. They NEVER paid into retirement and do NOT pay into retirement for ANY employee. I was expected to pay into it and did without bitching. except that's not the way people like it. They want paid, plus keep getting paid WELL AFTER THEY LEAVE. It's time for them to grow up and learn to take responsiblity for living on their own. |
|
| reply to ITALIAN926
Very well said. |
|
 ropeguruPremium
join:2001-01-25
Mechanicsville, VA | reply to Rob
said by Rob:said by hottboiinnc:It's time for more people to start paying into their own retirement. Don't wanna pay in, then keep working all your life. It's not the company's job to make sure you keep having income after you leave and retire.
And people would have no problem paying into their own retirement if they would receive raises and other adjustments to cost of living on a regular basis, especially when these companies are bringing in billions of dollars. They are finally getting a taste of what most workers have been having to do for years!!! That should be happy that they have had ALL their benefits paid for that not only includes the employee but their entire family as well. How many companies dod you know of that will pay the full amount for benefits not only for the employee but the whole family? |
|
bemis
join:2008-07-18
Reading, MA Reviews:
 ·Comcast
·Verizon FiOS
| reply to r81984
said by r81984:How can you expect a company to afford to pay for workers who no longer work for them? Workers who make them no money at all?
Let me just say that I am with you--I am against continued pensions now that it's plainly clear they are an unsustainable future nightmare for employers.
But the thing is that these companies did promise pensions to these workers and it would not be right to take them away. I think however that the unions need to accept this situation and work out some sort of a deal.
Any active employee with over 5 years of service keeps their arrangement. Active employee with less than 5 years gets a lump sum put into a 401K or other retirement account. Those same under-5 employees and new employees get an employer provided contribution either as a base contribution or a match.
For reference my employer will put 2% as long as a "match" if I put in 6%...
My health case "option" (is it really an option if your choice is that or nothing?) is a high deductible plan. In essence what I have is a catastrophic-coverage plan because I am responsible for 100% of the first $2,000 of my health costs per year, then 20% of them up to a max yearly out of pocket of $10,000.
My job required a technical college degree (electronics). I receive no bonus. My salary would be considered at the very low end of average given the number of years of experience I have.
So it seems like Verizon union workers probably have quite a lot of things to "give up" before they are down to what I believe is a relatively common private sector job. |
|
| reply to hottboiinnc
There's only one problem. That means they have to work until they die.
Of course, the company doesn't want old people working for them either.
I guess they'll just have to live on Social Security. Oh wait, they're going after that too.
The shills seem to just hate old people, or people in general. |
|
RobIn Deo speramus.Premium
join:2001-08-25
Kendall, FL
kudos:3 | reply to ropeguru
Aren't you a union member? |
|
| reply to hottboiinnc
I think I have finally reached the point of using my IGNORE button again, as this person has absolutly nothing constructive to contribute, but anti-employee, anti-consumer crap! |
|
 DataDocMy avatar looks like me, if I was 2D.Premium
join:2000-05-14
Greenville, NC | reply to osravens
The rich don't put their money in a bin, like Scrooge McDuck. It gets spent or invested.
Wise up. |
|
| reply to ropeguru
Yeah, its excellent that the money they have been spending locally buying stuff from, maybe, your place of work ropeguru will now go to an insurance company. Awesome!!
I am sure it is a great win for you and you can finally sleep at night knowing they have lost that. |
|
|
|
| reply to DataDoc
Yes, it gets spent on yachts and vacation homes while the people who actually do the work continue to lose more and more. |
|
| reply to r81984
(I'm not trying to stir up the pot...just an observation) 
Another point that should be added against pension failure is:
-When the government (state or federal) borrows against the pension funds.
-When the borrowed pension funds are not replaced.
-When pensions are invested in risk.
What good are pensions when the very controller is, well, stealing from the workers?
Pensions do work but not with the scale of inflation, the failed investments let alone no checksums or regulation (SEC failed with all the previous scandals...can we even trust investment bodies?) , inclusion of OT, and don't forget, longevity.
*My father has a pension, he's over 80 and took early out when 64. My Bro-n-law has a pension (IBM) and he's 65 (he was given early out at 59...). Friend's father was 55 when he left Verizon, plus was vet. His wife worked at Government installation and her pension, with his, is more than they made together when working.
I'm just against those collecting pensions*, plus SS plus taking jobs to afford their fishing boat, that vacation home and other hobbies (not cost of living...). 
(Let's say a NJ state director moves from one department to another. When he retired, he was not only eligible for pension (based on last 3 years salary averaged--now updated to 5 years) but also of the previous department pension work (double pensions).
Or how pensions can be based on last 3 years of salary, but include...get this...overtime).
Say a law officer works last three years at $62K, $65K, and $67K. Averaged @ $64.6K, a pension on 80% of worked salary should be $52K/annually + medical. Now, include OT in those three years (say $30K annually), the 3yr average is now $94.6K ...making the 80% rule $76K !!! The pension is MORE than the salary was.
This example shows the increased salary with based OT. That has to stop, right?
PS. I know when I retire, SS will be negative... WTF! Yet annually that SS letter shows how much I am to collect at age 65... lol...
--
Splat |
|
DataDocMy avatar looks like me, if I was 2D.Premium
join:2000-05-14
Greenville, NC | reply to osravens
And someone built those didn't they? Sounds like job creation to me. |
|
