CXM_SplicerLooking at the bigger picturePremium
|reply to Desertisp |
Re: Nothing strange about this objective.
Is it your opinion then that the backbones could also be replaced with wireless?
Sure, if you can put all the waves in a vacuum.
|reply to CXM_Splicer |
In my opinion? No. You can't reach the throughput of fiber over the air, however for places that's its physically impossible to run fiber I feel microwave is viable as a backbone, yes. Concerning wired connections such as cable, DSL, FTTH then there really is no replacement for a fiber backbone to the distribution point whether its a node, DSLAM or (obviously for FTTH) the optical splitter in the neighborhood. Seeing how AT&T and others refuse to go this route (upgrading backbones, removing caps due to increased capacity) I think they have no business doing wired connections and their wired customers should be handed over for pennies on the dollar to companies who will upgrade and maintain these networks since they won't.
I have family that is pretty damn country and you will drive for a long time before seeing a single house or evidence of another home somewhere and yet they all still have phone service over copper wires and they all have electricity. Even in very mountainous places they have these services. So it is possible and it was economically feasible then, just as it is now.
Can you name one city/town/community that does not have copper ran to it in one form or another?
I would agree with you about them handing over their assets as part of imminent domain, being they are unwilling to serve the people themselves.