| reply to Metatron2008
Re: [iPhone] Post your iPhone 5 speed tests Well then, I stand corrected. Regardless of who started it in the 'States, the Canadian carriers caught on eventually. |
|
Reviews:
 ·SureWest Internet
| reply to Metatron2008
AT&T LTE |
said by Metatron2008:These at&t lte speeds kinda suck. For about a year of verizons lte you could get 40+ mbit download, and in some cases 60.
It all depends where you live, I've seen Verizon LTE speeds here in KC no higher than 25-30Mbps.
--
My Internetz: Surewest 50/5, CenturyLink 10/896, AT&T U-verse 18/1.5, Sprint 4G Hotspot
Computer: i7 2600k@4.5GHz, GA-P67a-UD7-B3, 16GB DDR3, GTX 580 and GTX 260, Corsair 750W, Antec 1200 |
|
| reply to kcttocs
Sprint LTE in Ellicott City Maryland.
I measure mine in kB/s but everyone else is using the default Mbps. Here's the conversion:
2298 kilo BYTES per second = 17.9 mega BITS per second
--
less talk, more music |
|
| reply to Black_Mage
said by Black_Mage:I'm not impressed. I hope Sprint plans to activate 4G here soon so it's at least as fast as ATT's 3G. I tried uploading the picture directly from the phone. Didn't work.
Sprint's LTE is pretty good (see my post right above this).
--
less talk, more music |
|
Reviews:
 ·Cox HSI
1 edit | reply to kcttocs
AT&T LTE Las Vegas. Not bad ...
PS: Forgot to take a screen shot so, this is a picture retrieved via link from results/email |
|
 MajestikWorld TravelerPremium
join:2001-05-11
Tulsa, OK | reply to powerspec88
said by powerspec88:said by Metatron2008:These at&t lte speeds kinda suck. For about a year of verizons lte you could get 40+ mbit download, and in some cases 60.
It all depends where you live, I've seen Verizon LTE speeds here in KC no higher than 25-30Mbps. Indeed.
I don't think people know this if they never leave their billing area.
--
The adventure continues...Sanctuary.... |
|
Reviews:
·Charter
| I have left my 'billing area' many times.
Verizon has lte for pretty much all of the big cities in GA, and quite a few beyond. 3g everywhere else. At&t has better north ga coverage with 3g, but verizon is pretty much even IN LTE COVERAGE when taking in account the other areas that at&t doesn't cover. And that's at&ts 3g, at&ts lte is even lower in coverage and will probably stay that way.
Go out of the cities and you get edge crap with at&t. And edge crap for at&t is usually 600 ping 100 kbit d/50 u crap. |
|
MajestikWorld TravelerPremium
join:2001-05-11
Tulsa, OK | Gotcha! |
|
Reviews:
·Charter
| As of the moment, Verizon and at&t both have good speeds, but I doubt it will stay that way for At&t.
Look at how at&t handles upgrades versus verizon, look at uverse versus Fios. I would bet anything at&t has cut corners somewhere when building out lte. |
|
 MicPremium
join:2003-01-27
Minneapolis, MN
·Comcast
| reply to kcttocs
AT&T LTE Minneapolis
|
|
 ZacPremium
join:2001-09-12
Hanna, AB
·TELUS
| reply to kcttocs
Here's my recent batch of Telus LTE tests in Calgary, Alberta. Well first set of tests since I haven't been to the city since I got my phone. Tested in 2 local areas while a friend was driving around.
--
~There is no Normal or Abnormal... Just Diversity.
Member of Team Helix - Join Us? |
|
 RobIn Deo speramus.Premium
join:2001-08-25
Kendall, FL
kudos:3 | reply to Rob
Here's one while doing 60mph down the road..not bad.. not bad @ all! |
|
Reviews:
·Cox HSI
| reply to powerspec88
Fine with me ... |
|
|
|
| reply to kcttocs
»www.speedtest.net/iphone/355797094.png |
|
 darciliciousCyber LibrarianPremium
join:2001-01-02
Forest Grove, OR
kudos:2
 ·Frontier FiOS
| reply to kcttocs
on the edge of lte service |
--
♬ Music is life ♬ |
|
 not quite rightI'm not cool enough to be a Mac person
join:2001-06-23
Puyallup, WA
kudos:1
 ·Vonage
·Comcast
| reply to Metatron2008
said by Metatron2008:These at&t lte speeds kinda suck. For about a year of verizons lte you could get 40+ mbit download, and in some cases 60.
I consistently hit mid 40's to low 50's on at&t LTE in Seattle. I even got 63 once, left on my phone for weeks just to show off. 
--
Not many people know this, but I happen to be quite famous... |
|
 Elite
join:2002-10-03
Orange, CT | reply to kcttocs
Do I hold the downstream record with 65.88Mbit?
Edit: And the upstream record of 24.25Mbit?
Edit 2: UNLIMITED DATA LOLOLOLOL!
P.S. AT&T sure is slow!
--
QUAD!!!! |
|
| reply to kcttocs
LTE Columbus |
|
|
not quite rightI'm not cool enough to be a Mac person
join:2001-06-23
Puyallup, WA
kudos:1 Reviews:
·Vonage
·Comcast
| reply to kcttocs
I noticed that Puyallup, WA (Seattle-Tacoma Suburb) got at&t LTE on Tuesday! Could have been sooner that's just when I noticed.
--
Not many people know this, but I happen to be quite famous... |
|
darciliciousCyber LibrarianPremium
join:2001-01-02
Forest Grove, OR
kudos:2 Reviews:
·Frontier FiOS
| Nice! AT&T LTE was deployed in Corvallis and Eugene this week; I'm still waiting for Salem, then I will be quite happy with my coverage. (Salem really sucks, can barely stream audio in the afternoon  )
--
♬ Music is life ♬ |
|
