dslreports logo
 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery
spc
Search similar:


uniqs
170

jay608
Going Nucking Futs
join:2007-01-22
Homewood, IL
(Software) pfSense
Netgear CM1000
Zoom 5341J

jay608

Member

My $.02

First off anyone that owned a Samsung or Apple product on the jury should have not been on it. Second, a judge should be smart enough to see thru the line of bullshit, and dismiss it. (this would go the same way if it were visa versa)

As for "a rational and fair effort to address Samsung's willful misconduct that has and will impose lasting harm on Apple."

I want some of the stuff they are smoking cause it seems pretty damn good..

Thaler
Premium Member
join:2004-02-02
Los Angeles, CA

Thaler

Premium Member

said by jay608:

First off anyone that owned a Samsung or Apple product on the jury should have not been on it.

...so we're looking for a patent jury pool consisting of the Amish.

jay608
Going Nucking Futs
join:2007-01-22
Homewood, IL
(Software) pfSense
Netgear CM1000
Zoom 5341J

jay608

Member

Nope.. I've seen Amish with iphones..

I guess I should have worded that better..

Anyone with an Apple Iphone, Ipod touch, Ipad.. Samsung Smartphone, or tablet. should not have been on the jury.

So yeah HTC people could be on the jury..

Thaler
Premium Member
join:2004-02-02
Los Angeles, CA

Thaler

Premium Member

Was about to say...getting someone who's never used any Samsung product period would be asking for some really weird cave-dwelling people. They'd need to have not been out in society for the last, what, 10 years or so?