First off anyone that owned a Samsung or Apple product on the jury should have not been on it. Second, a judge should be smart enough to see thru the line of bullshit, and dismiss it. (this would go the same way if it were visa versa)
As for "a rational and fair effort to address Samsung's willful misconduct that has and will impose lasting harm on Apple."
I want some of the stuff they are smoking cause it seems pretty damn good..
Was about to say...getting someone who's never used any Samsung product period would be asking for some really weird cave-dwelling people. They'd need to have not been out in society for the last, what, 10 years or so?