vue666 (banned)Let's make Canchat better!!!
join:2007-12-07 |
vue666 (banned)
Member
2012-Sep-27 8:17 am
Re: Boy in chains appears at doorJust on the news the house is reported to be associated with a bondage website... |
|
| vue666 |
vue666 (banned)
Member
2012-Sep-27 12:39 pm
It gets worse...both the accussed Wayne Alan Cunningham and David LeBlanc have criminal records... » www.cbc.ca/news/canada/n ··· anc.htmlquote:
Both accused have criminal records.
They were convicted in Bridgewater in November 2006 of theft, breaking and entering, fraud, forgery and possession of stolen property.
Wayne Alan Cunningham was convicted of theft in 2006 along with David Leblanc. (RCMP)
David James Leblanc currently faces charges of making and distributing child pornography, sexual assault and sexual interference involving two boys aged two and five.
The allegations span several months and communities: July 5, 2010, in Dartmouth; June 1-Aug. 31, 2010, in Liverpool; Sept. 1-Dec. 1, 2010, in Lequille, Annapolis County.
The conditions of his release include that he must stay away from the internet, children and the communities of Liverpool and Lequille.
He's scheduled to be in court for those charges Nov. 26.
|
|
| |
I'm in favor of life sentences (dangerous offender status) for child kidnappers and pornographers, how about you guys? |
|
 EUSKill cancer
Premium Member
join:2002-09-10
canada |
EUS
Premium Member
2012-Sep-27 1:26 pm
I'm more of a high-velocity_cranium_piercings punishment type of guy when it come to deranged crimes like this. |
|
| |
to dragonfly5
said by dragonfly5:I'm in favor of life sentences (dangerous offender status) for child kidnappers and pornographers, how about you guys?
Anyone that sexually abuses a child or kidnaps a child with the intent to sexually abuse a child, yes, they need to be locked up and the key needs to be thrown away. I fully endorse "rot in prison". Creating pornography, falls under the first one. Viewing it without the intent to engage in the acts... I'm on the fence here as the private in-home viewing of the content may prevent a person from acting out their desires. A man beats off to regular porn, he's good for a while... can the same be said for potential exploiters of children? I don't know. Maybe it's like video games, where I can play a game like Grand Theft Auto and mow down a pile of people and shoot them to death, but I'd never do that in 'real life'. |
|
 AnavSarcastic Llama? Naw, Just Acerbic
Premium Member
join:2001-07-16
Dartmouth, NS |
Anav to EUS
Premium Member
2012-Sep-27 1:52 pm
to EUS
said by EUS:I'm more of a really really really slow high-velocity_cranium_piercings punishment type of guy when it come to deranged crimes like this.
Fixed it for ya!! |
|
|
vue666 (banned)Let's make Canchat better!!!
join:2007-12-07 |
vue666 (banned)
Member
2012-Sep-27 4:40 pm
The boy who was held captive has told police he was literally snatched off of the streets of Halifax by these punks... He woke up in a van and was taken to a house where he was sexually abused. The teenager told police his abductors had plans of "selling him".... I thought crap like this only happened in B grade horror movies... » www.news957.com/news/loc ··· ling-himOn the radio it is reported they maybe in Ontario so keep an eye out for NS plates... quote:
Leblanc says one is a grey 2003 Hyundai Elantra with a Nova Scotia licence plate of FBP 233.
He says the second is a brown 2002 Chevrolet Venture van with a Nova Scotia licence plate of EZG 581.
Lets hope and pray these creeps get apprehended before they harm someone else... Looks like the Justice system once again has failed Canadians... |
|
| |
I heard it discussed on CBC Radio, it's pretty crazy that this one guy has a court case tied up right now that involves a 2 year old and a 5 year old boy... meanwhile he can victimize a 16 year old.
According to the news, the 16 year old was too scared to talk to people or escape because they threatened to hurt his family. |
|
vue666 (banned)Let's make Canchat better!!!
join:2007-12-07 |
vue666 (banned)
Member
2012-Sep-27 4:56 pm
Yup...this is getting national coverage... Apparently even CNN and other news media are reporting on this according to our local radio...
A very sad way for Nova Scotia to get media attention.... |
|
| |
to vue666
said by vue666:Just on the news the house is reported to be associated with a bondage website...
And yet the Toronto School Board sees nothing wrong with linking to a website that tells kids to " tie someone up and pleasure them".... » Toronto school board website links to veggie sex site |
|
 A Lurkerthat's Ms Lurker btw
Premium Member
join:2007-10-27
Wellington N
1 recommendation |
to urbanriot
said by urbanriot:Viewing it without the intent to engage in the acts... I'm on the fence here as the private in-home viewing of the content may prevent a person from acting out their desires. A man beats off to regular porn, he's good for a while... can the same be said for potential exploiters of children? I don't know. Yes, but whose kids do you sign up to make the porn? I get what you're saying, but when you allow the viewing of it without consequences, you create the market demand for it. |
|
| |
said by A Lurker:Yes, but whose kids do you sign up to make the porn? I get what you're saying, but when you allow the viewing of it without consequences, you create the market demand for it.
I didn't consider the making of it, only the fact that it's 'out there'... you have a good point. |
|
| |
to A Lurker
said by A Lurker:Yes, but whose kids do you sign up to make the porn? I get what you're saying, but when you allow the viewing of it without consequences, you create the market demand for it. This is a very scary thought indeed. The entire concept makes me want to vomit. On the flip side; in theory we're getting to the point where such material will not require real actors at all. In theory the actors could be simulations. Which then changes the entire concept - since you've eliminated victims in the creation - should it be legal. Boy I'd like to close that box I just opened. |
|
A Lurkerthat's Ms Lurker btw
Premium Member
join:2007-10-27
Wellington N |
A Lurker
Premium Member
2012-Oct-2 9:15 pm
said by CanadianRip:On the flip side; in theory we're getting to the point where such material will not require real actors at all. In theory the actors could be simulations. Agreed (although the concept is creepy). I would suspect that some just wouldn't get off on simulated actors, even if lifelike and realistic. |
|
|
AnavSarcastic Llama? Naw, Just Acerbic
Premium Member
join:2001-07-16
Dartmouth, NS |
Anav
Premium Member
2012-Oct-2 10:14 pm
I think A lurker you hit the nail on Urbans head with your comment. Its the same with exploitation of women. Although there may be no result of you watching it in your home, the fact is many women are abused to feed the porn industry. Its a sick cycle. In the case of children they are exploited but not being adults puts them into a different category such that society is willing to go to greater lengths in their defence.......... such that even possessing the material is illegal. |
|
