<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Re: Review&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Review-27568493</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 05:52:10 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 05:52:10 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Review</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Review-27573132</link>
<description><![CDATA[hottboiinnc posted : When I first read the topic it was on page 2 and headed to page 3.  Now its much much shorter.   And now it doesn't say anything was removed by a Mod. - at least that I can see.   And they won't tell me anything.  The Mods on here do NOT like me for the most part.  They LOVE censoring me and the truth.  Only a few of them are nice and will tell you things. others are um yah.  we'll leave it at that.    The person that puts up the Morning/evening links may help you on what else was removed. He seems pretty nice when I contacted me in regards to an error on the site.  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Review-27573132</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2012 11:27:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Review</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Review-27570752</link>
<description><![CDATA[OneWorld9 posted : I'm not aware of what else was removed?  I know that TSI Andre's response to me, and all replies (6 of them, as indicated by a mod) were removed.  There was more?  Perhaps you can check with a mod about that.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Review-27570752</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 13:32:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Review</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Review-27570135</link>
<description><![CDATA[hottboiinnc posted : I find it funny that most of the topic has been removed.  And only part says a mod did it.  I wanna know what happened to the rest.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Review-27570135</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 11:08:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Review</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Review-27569363</link>
<description><![CDATA[OneWorld9 posted : Yeah, unfortunately, the blackholed post was a result of my replying to the same post from TSI Andre (above) in the original thread:<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="/forum/r27568154-TekSavvy-glorified-reseller-not-ISP">TekSavvy - glorified reseller, not ISP</A><br><br>[you'll notice his post above was edited to remove that quote - in the thread, his post and all replies (including mine) were blackholed]<br><br>In it, he felt it was necessary to quote me from the private TekSavvy Direct forum - apparently, that was against the terms here.  It was also a backhanded way of handling customer service.  That just goes to show how awesome an "ISP" TekSavvy is - ready to slap a customer in the face whenever the truth is told.<br><br>Good thing I have a text copy of that particular post, as it was a lengthy reply to his misrepresented facts of what actually happened.  I'm just not sure what part of my reply is considered "OK" to post on this site, so I'll have to clarify before I add anything to that thread.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Review-27569363</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 03:20:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Review</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Review-27568721</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : Tried to click on your link for the background on your issues but it was "black holed".<br><br>I do seem to notice that TekSavvy works hard on DSLReports regarding damage control. LOL Of course it doesn't mean they actually resolve customer issues. I find it a bit revolting that they would try and dump on the customer though. Seems a low blow.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Review-27568721</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 21:50:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Review</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Review-27568533</link>
<description><![CDATA[OneWorld9 posted : I've already answered this here:<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="/forum/r27568504-">Re: TekSavvy - glorified reseller, not ISP</A><br><br>For anyone who wants to see the full story, and not rely on TekSavvy's attempts to take things way out of context and cast doubt on the integrity of a long-standing customer.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Review-27568533</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 20:00:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Review</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Review-27568493</link>
<description><![CDATA[TSI Andre posted : Hi OneWorld9,<br><br>I think its a little out there to be stating that we are the worst ISP. I can understand that you are having issues and based on the comment below you posted in our direct forum, that you want to share your experience but the reality is that we have sent Techs out to your house, and with the exceptions of a few times where there were outages, your issues are most likely caused by either Maintenance or Local Node Congestion.<br><br>You had asked that we send a tech during the timeframes of your issue, but we can't send a tech between 12am - 7am. We can ask all we want but Rogers is not going to dispatch at this time. Martin provided you with timeframes when we can send another tech to take a look and we can even request a senior tech but you decided to reach out here.<br><br>We are here to help you but if your not willing to accept a tech during the times we can send one, there isn't much we can do.<br><br>Please let me know how you want to proceed.<br><br>Thanks,<br><br>Andre<br><small>--<br>TSI Andre<br>Director of Service Delivery<br>Authorized TSI Employee ( &raquo;<A HREF="/faq/teksavvy">TekSavvy FAQ</A> &raquo;<A HREF="/faq/14672#14672">Official support in the forum</A> ) <br>@AndreCleroux - Follow me on Twitter</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Review-27568493</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 19:46:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
